Analysis Report

Shared security patch analysis results

AI Used: DEEPSEEK deepseek-chat
Share this analysis
8 filtered / 8 total files
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/utils/user-helpers.ts AI: Not sure
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.0/Rocket.Chat-7.8.0/apps/meteor/tests/e2e/utils/user-helpers.ts+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.1/Rocket.Chat-7.8.1/apps/meteor/tests/e2e/utils/user-helpers.ts@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ 	name?: string; 	password?: string; 	roles?: string[];+	data?: Record<string, any>; } export interface ITestUser {@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ 		password: options.password || DEFAULT_USER_CREDENTIALS.password, 		username: options.username || `test-user-${faker.string.uuid()}`, 		roles: options.roles || ['user'],+		...options.data, 	}; 	const response = await api.post('/users.create', userData);
AI Analysis
Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
   [Potential Information Disclosure] [File: apps/meteor/tests/e2e/utils/user-helpers.ts] [Lines: 11, 32]
   [Old Code]
   interface IUserParams {
       name?: string;
       password?: string;
       roles?: string[];
   }
   
   const userData = {
       name: options.name || `test-user-${faker.string.uuid()}`,
       password: options.password || DEFAULT_USER_CREDENTIALS.password,
       username: options.username || `test-user-${faker.string.uuid()}`,
       roles: options.roles || ['user'],
   };
   [Fixed Code]
   interface IUserParams {
       name?: string;
       password?: string;
       roles?: string[];
       data?: Record<string, any>;
   }
   
   const userData = {
       name: options.name || `test-user-${faker.string.uuid()}`,
       password: options.password || DEFAULT_USER_CREDENTIALS.password,
       username: options.username || `test-user-${faker.string.uuid()}`,
       roles: options.roles || ['user'],
       ...options.data,
   };

   Additional Details: The change adds a flexible 'data' field that can accept any additional user properties. While this might be intentional for testing purposes, it could potentially lead to information disclosure if sensitive data is accidentally included in this field. However, since this is in test code, the risk is lower.
apps/meteor/CHANGELOG.md AI: Not sure
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.0/Rocket.Chat-7.8.0/apps/meteor/CHANGELOG.md+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.1/Rocket.Chat-7.8.1/apps/meteor/CHANGELOG.md@@ -1,4 +1,46 @@ # @rocket.chat/meteor++## 7.8.1++### Patch Changes++- ([#36430](https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/pull/36430) by [@dionisio-bot](https://github.com/dionisio-bot)) fixes: v1/updateOwnBasicInfo does not trigger user stream++- fixes an issue where depending on some race conditions the subscription stream was not being updated++- Bump @rocket.chat/meteor version.++- ([#36432](https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/pull/36432) by [@dionisio-bot](https://github.com/dionisio-bot)) Fixes redirection not being triggered after a required password change++- <details><summary>Updated dependencies []:</summary>++  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]
AI Analysis
Based on the provided CHANGELOG.md diff, I don't see any actual code changes - only version updates and changelog entries. The changelog mentions fixes for two issues, but doesn't provide code context to analyze security vulnerabilities.

Here's the analysis following your format:

1. For the first mentioned fix:
    Vulnerability Existed: not sure
    [No vulnerability name] [No file] [No lines]
    [No old code]
    [No fixed code]
    Note: The changelog mentions "fixes: v1/updateOwnBasicInfo does not trigger user stream" but without code context, we can't determine if this was a security issue.

2. For the second mentioned fix:
    Vulnerability Existed: not sure  
    [No vulnerability name] [No file] [No lines]
    [No old code]
    [No fixed code]
    Note: The changelog mentions "Fixes redirection not being triggered after a required password change" which could potentially have security implications, but without code context we can't confirm.

The diff only shows version updates in the changelog file, not any actual code changes that would allow for security vulnerability analysis. To properly assess security fixes, we would need to see the actual code changes in the relevant source files.
apps/meteor/server/methods/setUserPassword.ts AI: Not sure
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.0/Rocket.Chat-7.8.0/apps/meteor/server/methods/setUserPassword.ts+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.1/Rocket.Chat-7.8.1/apps/meteor/server/methods/setUserPassword.ts@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import type { UpdateResult } from 'mongodb'; import { passwordPolicy } from '../../app/lib/server';+import { notifyOnUserChange } from '../../app/lib/server/lib/notifyListener'; import { compareUserPassword } from '../lib/compareUserPassword'; declare module '@rocket.chat/ddp-client' {@@ -52,6 +53,14 @@ 			logout: false, 		});-		return Users.unsetRequirePasswordChange(userId);+		const update = await Users.unsetRequirePasswordChange(userId);++		void notifyOnUserChange({+			clientAction: 'updated',+			id: userId,+			diff: { requirePasswordChange: false, requirePasswordChangeReason: false },
AI Analysis
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
   [Potential Missing Event Notification] [apps/meteor/server/methods/setUserPassword.ts] [Lines 52-60]
   [Old Code]
   return Users.unsetRequirePasswordChange(userId);
   [Fixed Code]
   const update = await Users.unsetRequirePasswordChange(userId);

   void notifyOnUserChange({
       clientAction: 'updated',
       id: userId,
       diff: { requirePasswordChange: false, requirePasswordChangeReason: false },
   });

   return update;

Additional Details:
The main change is the addition of a notification system when a user's password is changed. While this doesn't directly indicate a security vulnerability, it could be related to fixing an issue where other systems weren't being properly notified of password changes. The notification ensures that all systems are aware of the password change event, which could prevent synchronization issues or stale data problems. However, without more context about the specific security implications, I can't definitively identify a vulnerability.
apps/meteor/server/methods/saveUserProfile.ts AI: Not sure
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.0/Rocket.Chat-7.8.0/apps/meteor/server/methods/saveUserProfile.ts+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.1/Rocket.Chat-7.8.1/apps/meteor/server/methods/saveUserProfile.ts@@ -7,9 +7,11 @@ import { Meteor } from 'meteor/meteor'; import { twoFactorRequired } from '../../app/2fa/server/twoFactorRequired';+import { getUserInfo } from '../../app/api/server/helpers/getUserInfo'; import { saveCustomFields } from '../../app/lib/server/functions/saveCustomFields'; import { validateUserEditing } from '../../app/lib/server/functions/saveUser'; import { saveUserIdentity } from '../../app/lib/server/functions/saveUserIdentity';+import { notifyOnUserChange } from '../../app/lib/server/lib/notifyListener'; import { passwordPolicy } from '../../app/lib/server/lib/passwordPolicy'; import { setEmailFunction } from '../../app/lib/server/methods/setEmail'; import { settings as rcSettings } from '../../app/settings/server';@@ -158,6 +160,14 @@ 	// App IPostUserUpdated event hook 	const updatedUser = await Users.findOneById(this.userId);++	// This should never happen, but since `Users.findOneById` might return null, we'll handle it just in case+	if (!updatedUser) {+		throw new Error('Unexpected error after saving user profile: user not found');+	}++	void notifyOnUserChange({ clientAction: 'updated', id: updatedUser._id, diff: await getUserInfo(updatedUser) });+ 	await Apps.self?.triggerEvent(AppEvents.IPostUserUpdated, { user: updatedUser, previousUser: user });
AI Analysis
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure  
   [Potential Null Pointer Dereference] [apps/meteor/server/methods/saveUserProfile.ts] [Lines 158-160]  
   [Old Code]  
   ```typescript
   const updatedUser = await Users.findOneById(this.userId);
   await Apps.self?.triggerEvent(AppEvents.IPostUserUpdated, { user: updatedUser, previousUser: user });
   ```  
   [Fixed Code]  
   ```typescript
   const updatedUser = await Users.findOneById(this.userId);
   if (!updatedUser) {
       throw new Error('Unexpected error after saving user profile: user not found');
   }
   await Apps.self?.triggerEvent(AppEvents.IPostUserUpdated, { user: updatedUser, previousUser: user });
   ```  
   Additional Details: The fix adds a null check for the `updatedUser` variable, preventing potential null pointer dereference. While this improves code robustness, it's not clear if this was actually exploitable as a security vulnerability.

2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure  
   [Potential Information Disclosure] [apps/meteor/server/methods/saveUserProfile.ts] [Lines 160+]  
   [Old Code]  
   (No notification mechanism present)  
   [Fixed Code]  
   ```typescript
   void notifyOnUserChange({ clientAction: 'updated', id: updatedUser._id, diff: await getUserInfo(updatedUser) });
   ```  
   Additional Details: The addition of `notifyOnUserChange` with `getUserInfo` suggests better tracking of user profile changes, but it's unclear if this fixes an actual information disclosure issue or just adds monitoring capability.

Note: While the changes improve the code's robustness and add monitoring capabilities, I couldn't identify any clear security vulnerabilities that were fixed. The changes appear to be more about defensive programming and adding new features rather than patching specific security holes.
apps/meteor/package.json AI: No vulnerabilities
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.0/Rocket.Chat-7.8.0/apps/meteor/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.1/Rocket.Chat-7.8.1/apps/meteor/package.json@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/meteor", 	"description": "The Ultimate Open Source WebChat Platform",-	"version": "7.8.0",+	"version": "7.8.1", 	"private": true, 	"type": "commonjs", 	"author": {
AI Analysis
Based on the provided diff, I can analyze the changes in the package.json file:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   Version Update [File] apps/meteor/package.json [Lines] 1-7
   Old Code: "version": "7.8.0",
   Fixed Code: "version": "7.8.1",
   
   Additional Details: This appears to be a simple version number update with no security implications. The change from 7.8.0 to 7.8.1 suggests a minor version bump, typically used for bug fixes or minor improvements rather than security patches.

No other changes were detected in the provided diff that would indicate security vulnerabilities. The diff only shows a version number update without any dependency changes or other modifications that might relate to security.
ee/apps/authorization-service/package.json AI: Not sure
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.0/Rocket.Chat-7.8.0/ee/apps/authorization-service/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.1/Rocket.Chat-7.8.1/ee/apps/authorization-service/package.json@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/authorization-service", 	"private": true,-	"version": "0.4.29",+	"version": "0.4.30", 	"description": "Rocket.Chat Authorization service", 	"scripts": { 		"build": "tsc -p tsconfig.json",
AI Analysis
Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security fixes:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Dependency Update] [ee/apps/authorization-service/package.json] [Lines 4]
[Old Code]
"version": "0.4.29",
[Fixed Code]
"version": "0.4.30",

Additional Details:
- The diff only shows a version bump in package.json
- No direct security vulnerability is visible in this change
- Version bumps often include security fixes, but we can't confirm without changelog
- No dependency versions were modified in this diff
- The change could be related to security fixes in the service itself, but we can't determine that from this limited information

Note: To properly assess security implications, we would need:
1. The changelog for version 0.4.30
2. Any updated dependencies (though none are shown in this diff)
3. The actual code changes between these versions
apps/meteor/app/lib/server/functions/setUsername.ts AI: 1 vulnerabilities
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.0/Rocket.Chat-7.8.0/apps/meteor/app/lib/server/functions/setUsername.ts+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.1/Rocket.Chat-7.8.1/apps/meteor/app/lib/server/functions/setUsername.ts@@ -7,9 +7,6 @@ import type { ClientSession } from 'mongodb'; import _ from 'underscore';-import { hasPermissionAsync } from '../../../authorization/server/functions/hasPermission';-import { settings } from '../../../settings/server';-import { RateLimiter } from '../lib'; import { addUserToRoom } from './addUserToRoom'; import { checkUsernameAvailability } from './checkUsernameAvailability'; import { getAvatarSuggestionForUser } from './getAvatarSuggestionForUser';@@ -20,6 +17,7 @@ import { callbacks } from '../../../../lib/callbacks'; import { onceTransactionCommitedSuccessfully } from '../../../../server/database/utils'; import { SystemLogger } from '../../../../server/lib/logger/system';+import { settings } from '../../../settings/server'; import { notifyOnUserChange } from '../lib/notifyListener'; export const setUsernameWithValidation = async (userId: string, username: string, joinDefaultChannelsSilenced?: boolean): Promise<void> => {@@ -151,10 +149,3 @@
AI Analysis
Analyzing the provided code diff for security fixes:

1. Vulnerability Existed: yes
   Rate Limiting Bypass [File] apps/meteor/app/lib/server/functions/setUsername.ts [Lines] 151-157 (removed)
   [Old Code]
   export const setUsername = RateLimiter.limitFunction(_setUsername, 1, 60000, {
       async 0() {
           const userId = Meteor.userId();
           return !userId || !(await hasPermissionAsync(userId, 'edit-other-user-info'));
       },
   });
   [Fixed Code]
   (Removed entirely)

   Additional Details: The removal of the rate limiting function could potentially allow brute force attacks or excessive requests to the username setting functionality. The rate limiter was previously protecting the _setUsername function with a limit of 1 request per minute (60000ms) and included permission checks.

2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
   Authorization Check Removal [File] apps/meteor/app/lib/server/functions/setUsername.ts [Lines] 7-9 (removed)
   [Old Code]
   import { hasPermissionAsync } from '../../../authorization/server/functions/hasPermission';
   [Fixed Code]
   (Removed import)

   Additional Details: The removal of the hasPermissionAsync import suggests possible changes to authorization checks, but without seeing the full context of how this is used elsewhere in the file, we can't be certain if this introduces a vulnerability. The permission check was previously used in the rate limiter that was removed.

Note: The diff also shows some reorganization of imports (moving settings import), but this doesn't appear to have security implications. The main security-relevant changes are the removal of the rate limiter and permission-related imports.
ee/apps/authorization-service/CHANGELOG.md AI: No vulnerabilities
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.0/Rocket.Chat-7.8.0/ee/apps/authorization-service/CHANGELOG.md+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/rocketchat_downloads/7.8.1/Rocket.Chat-7.8.1/ee/apps/authorization-service/CHANGELOG.md@@ -1,4 +1,18 @@ # @rocket.chat/authorization-service++## 0.4.30++### Patch Changes++- <details><summary>Updated dependencies []:</summary>++  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  </details>
AI Analysis
Based on the provided diff content, which only shows changes to a CHANGELOG.md file (a documentation file), I can analyze this for potential security implications:

Vulnerability Existed: no
[No vulnerability found] [ee/apps/authorization-service/CHANGELOG.md] [Lines 1-18]
[Old changelog content]
[Updated changelog with dependency information]

Additional details:
- The diff only shows version updates in documentation
- No actual code changes are present in this diff
- Dependency updates are listed but without version diffs or security context
- CHANGELOG.md files typically don't contain vulnerabilities themselves

Since this is purely a documentation update showing dependency changes without any context about security fixes in those dependencies, I cannot identify any specific vulnerabilities from this diff alone.