Shared security patch analysis results
AI Used: DEEPSEEK deepseek-chat--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/js/vendor/sprintf.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/js/vendor/sprintf.js@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /**- * Copyright (c) 2007-2016 Kevin van Zonneveld (https://kvz.io)+ * Copyright (c) 2007-2024 Kevin van Zonneveld (https://kvz.io) * and Contributors (https://locutus.io/authors) * * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ if (!chr) { chr = ' ' }- var padding = (str.length >= len) ? '' : new Array(1 + len - str.length >>> 0).join(chr)+ const padding = str.length >= len ? '' : new Array((1 + len - str.length) >>> 0).join(chr) return leftJustify ? str + padding : padding + str }@@ -72,11 +72,7 @@ // on the left side // keep sign (+ or -) in front if (!leftJustify && padChar === '0') {- value = [- value.slice(0, prefix.length),- _pad('', diff, '0', true),- value.slice(prefix.length)- ].join('')+ value = [value.slice(0, prefix.length), _pad('', diff, '0', true), value.slice(prefix.length)].join('') } else { value = _pad(value, minWidth, padChar, leftJustify) }@@ -145,7 +141,7 @@ } if (!precision) {- precision = (specifier === 'd') ? 0 : 'fFeE'.indexOf(specifier) > -1 ? 6 : undefined+ precision = specifier === 'd' ? 0 : 'fFeE'.indexOf(specifier) > -1 ? 6 : undefined } else { precision = +precision }@@ -174,15 +170,14 @@ case 'x': return _formatBaseX(value, 16, leftJustify, minWidth, precision, padChar) case 'X':- return _formatBaseX(value, 16, leftJustify, minWidth, precision, padChar)- .toUpperCase()+ return _formatBaseX(value, 16, leftJustify, minWidth, precision, padChar).toUpperCase() case 'u': return _formatBaseX(value, 10, leftJustify, minWidth, precision, padChar) case 'i': case 'd': number = +value || 0 // Plain Math.round doesn't just truncate- number = Math.round(number - number % 1)+ number = Math.round(number - (number % 1)) prefix = number < 0 ? '-' : positiveNumberPrefix value = prefix + _pad(String(Math.abs(number)), precision, '0', false)
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff for security fixes: 1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential Integer Overflow/Precision Issue] [js/vendor/sprintf.js] [Lines 61] [Old Code] `var padding = (str.length >= len) ? '' : new Array(1 + len - str.length >>> 0).join(chr)` [Fixed Code] `const padding = str.length >= len ? '' : new Array((1 + len - str.length) >>> 0).join(chr)` Additional Details: The change adds parentheses around the bitwise operation, which might prevent potential integer overflow or precision issues, but this isn't clearly a security fix. 2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential String Formatting Issue] [js/vendor/sprintf.js] [Lines 72-76] [Old Code] Multi-line array join with separate slices [Fixed Code] Simplified to a single line array join Additional Details: The change simplifies string formatting logic but doesn't clearly fix a security vulnerability. 3. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential Numeric Precision Issue] [js/vendor/sprintf.js] [Lines 174-175] [Old Code] `number = Math.round(number - number % 1)` [Fixed Code] `number = Math.round(number - (number % 1))` Additional Details: The added parentheses might prevent numeric precision issues in certain edge cases, but this isn't clearly a security fix. Note: The diff primarily shows code style improvements and minor logic adjustments rather than clear security fixes. The copyright year update suggests this might be part of routine maintenance rather than security patching. No obvious vulnerabilities (like XSS, injection, etc.) were fixed in this diff.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/VersionInformationTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/VersionInformationTest.php@@ -61,11 +61,12 @@ { $this->setProxySettings(); $GLOBALS['cfg']['VersionCheck'] = true;+ unset($_SESSION['cache']['version_check']); $versionInformation = new VersionInformation(); $version = $versionInformation->getLatestVersion();- $this->assertIsObject($version);- $this->assertNotEmpty($version->version);- $this->assertNotEmpty($version->date);+ self::assertIsObject($version);+ self::assertNotEmpty($version->version);+ self::assertNotEmpty($version->date); } /**@@ -79,16 +80,13 @@ public function testVersionToInt(string $version, int $numeric): void { $versionInformation = new VersionInformation();- $this->assertEquals(- $numeric,- $versionInformation->versionToInt($version)- );+ self::assertSame($numeric, $versionInformation->versionToInt($version)); } /** * Data provider for version parsing */- public function dataVersions(): array+ public static function dataVersions(): array { return [ [@@ -172,6 +170,8 @@ /** * Tests getLatestCompatibleVersion() when there is only one server configured+ *+ * @requires PHPUnit < 10 */ public function testGetLatestCompatibleVersionWithSingleServer(): void {@@ -199,12 +199,14 @@ ->willReturnOnConsecutiveCalls(true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true); $compatible = $mockVersionInfo->getLatestCompatibleVersion($this->releases);- $this->assertIsArray($compatible);- $this->assertEquals('4.4.14.1', $compatible['version']);+ self::assertIsArray($compatible);+ self::assertSame('4.4.14.1', $compatible['version']); } /** * Tests getLatestCompatibleVersion() when there are multiple servers configured+ *+ * @requires PHPUnit < 10 */ public function testGetLatestCompatibleVersionWithMultipleServers(): void {@@ -226,12 +228,14 @@ ->willReturnOnConsecutiveCalls(true, true); $compatible = $mockVersionInfo->getLatestCompatibleVersion($this->releases);- $this->assertIsArray($compatible);- $this->assertEquals('4.4.14.1', $compatible['version']);+ self::assertIsArray($compatible);+ self::assertSame('4.4.14.1', $compatible['version']); } /** * Tests getLatestCompatibleVersion() with an old PHP version+ *+ * @requires PHPUnit < 10 */ public function testGetLatestCompatibleVersionWithOldPHPVersion(): void {@@ -255,8 +259,8 @@ ->willReturnOnConsecutiveCalls(false, false, true, true); $compatible = $mockVersionInfo->getLatestCompatibleVersion($this->releases);- $this->assertIsArray($compatible);- $this->assertEquals('4.0.10.10', $compatible['version']);+ self::assertIsArray($compatible);+ self::assertSame('4.0.10.10', $compatible['version']); } /**@@ -267,6 +271,7 @@ * @param string|null $matchedLastVersion The version that will be matched * * @dataProvider dataProviderVersionConditions+ * @requires PHPUnit < 10 */ public function testGetLatestCompatibleVersionWithNewPHPVersion( array $versions,@@ -296,7 +301,7 @@ ->willReturnOnConsecutiveCalls(...$returnValues); $compatible = $mockVersionInfo->getLatestCompatibleVersion($versions);- $this->assertEquals($matchedLastVersion, $compatible['version'] ?? null);+ self::assertSame($matchedLastVersion, $compatible['version'] ?? null); } /**@@ -305,7 +310,7 @@ * * @return array[] */- public function dataProviderVersionConditions(): array+ public static function dataProviderVersionConditions(): array { return [ [@@ -553,16 +558,16 @@ ->method('getPHPVersion') ->will($this->returnValue('5.2.4'));- $this->assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '<=5.3'));- $this->assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '<5.3'));- $this->assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '>=5.2'));- $this->assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '>5.2'));- $this->assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '!=5.3'));-- $this->assertFalse($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '<=5.2'));- $this->assertFalse($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '<5.2'));- $this->assertFalse($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '>=7.0'));- $this->assertFalse($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '>7.0'));- $this->assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '!=5.2'));+ self::assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '<=5.3'));+ self::assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '<5.3'));+ self::assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '>=5.2'));+ self::assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '>5.2'));+ self::assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '!=5.3'));++ self::assertFalse($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '<=5.2'));+ self::assertFalse($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '<5.2'));+ self::assertFalse($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '>=7.0'));+ self::assertFalse($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '>7.0'));+ self::assertTrue($mockVersionInfo->evaluateVersionCondition('PHP', '!=5.2')); } }
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any clear security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be primarily test improvements and code quality enhancements. Here's the analysis: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no No security vulnerability found in the diff. The changes are test-related improvements including: - Adding session cache clearing (`unset($_SESSION['cache']['version_check'])`) - Changing assertion methods from `$this->assert...` to `self::assert...` - Adding `@requires PHPUnit < 10` annotations - Making data provider methods static - Using `assertSame()` instead of `assertEquals()` 2. Vulnerability Existed: no No security vulnerability found in the diff. The changes include: - Test method improvements - Better version comparison assertions - Code style improvements The diff shows test suite improvements rather than security fixes. The main changes are: - Better test isolation by clearing session cache - Modernizing test assertions - Adding PHPUnit version requirements - Making data providers static (best practice) - Using stricter comparison methods No CVE or known vulnerability patterns were identified in these changes.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/Controllers/Server/Status/Monitor/QueryAnalyzerControllerTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/Controllers/Server/Status/Monitor/QueryAnalyzerControllerTest.php@@ -70,14 +70,8 @@ $this->assertAllSelectsConsumed(); $ret = $response->getJSONResult();- $this->assertEquals('cached_affected_rows', $ret['message']['affectedRows']);- $this->assertEquals(- [],- $ret['message']['profiling']- );- $this->assertEquals(- [$value],- $ret['message']['explain']- );+ self::assertSame('cached_affected_rows', $ret['message']['affectedRows']);+ self::assertSame([], $ret['message']['profiling']);+ self::assertSame([$value], $ret['message']['explain']); } }
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be test code improvements, specifically changing `assertEquals` to `assertSame` for more strict comparisons in the test assertions.
Here's the structured response:
Vulnerability Existed: no
[No security vulnerability found] [test/classes/Controllers/Server/Status/Monitor/QueryAnalyzerControllerTest.php] [Lines 70-78]
[Old Code]
$this->assertEquals('cached_affected_rows', $ret['message']['affectedRows']);
$this->assertEquals(
[],
$ret['message']['profiling']
);
$this->assertEquals(
[$value],
$ret['message']['explain']
);
[Fixed Code]
self::assertSame('cached_affected_rows', $ret['message']['affectedRows']);
self::assertSame([], $ret['message']['profiling']);
self::assertSame([$value], $ret['message']['explain']);
The changes are purely related to test assertions and don't impact the security of the application. The modification from `assertEquals` to `assertSame` makes the test more strict by also checking the type of the values being compared, but this is a testing improvement rather than a security fix.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/Controllers/Server/Privileges/AccountLockControllerTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/Controllers/Server/Privileges/AccountLockControllerTest.php@@ -64,10 +64,10 @@ ($this->controller)($this->requestStub); $message = Message::success('The account [email protected] has been successfully locked.');- $this->assertTrue($this->responseRendererStub->isAjax());- $this->assertEquals(200, $this->responseRendererStub->getHttpResponseCode());- $this->assertTrue($this->responseRendererStub->hasSuccessState());- $this->assertEquals(['message' => $message->getDisplay()], $this->responseRendererStub->getJSONResult());+ self::assertTrue($this->responseRendererStub->isAjax());+ self::assertSame(200, $this->responseRendererStub->getHttpResponseCode());+ self::assertTrue($this->responseRendererStub->hasSuccessState());+ self::assertSame(['message' => $message->getDisplay()], $this->responseRendererStub->getJSONResult()); } public function testWithInvalidAccount(): void@@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ ($this->controller)($this->requestStub); $message = Message::error('Invalid account.');- $this->assertTrue($this->responseRendererStub->isAjax());- $this->assertEquals(400, $this->responseRendererStub->getHttpResponseCode());- $this->assertFalse($this->responseRendererStub->hasSuccessState());- $this->assertEquals(['message' => $message->getDisplay()], $this->responseRendererStub->getJSONResult());+ self::assertTrue($this->responseRendererStub->isAjax());+ self::assertSame(400, $this->responseRendererStub->getHttpResponseCode());+ self::assertFalse($this->responseRendererStub->hasSuccessState());+ self::assertSame(['message' => $message->getDisplay()], $this->responseRendererStub->getJSONResult()); } public function testWithUnsupportedServer(): void@@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ ($this->controller)($this->requestStub); $message = Message::error('Account locking is not supported.');- $this->assertTrue($this->responseRendererStub->isAjax());- $this->assertEquals(400, $this->responseRendererStub->getHttpResponseCode());- $this->assertFalse($this->responseRendererStub->hasSuccessState());- $this->assertEquals(['message' => $message->getDisplay()], $this->responseRendererStub->getJSONResult());+ self::assertTrue($this->responseRendererStub->isAjax());+ self::assertSame(400, $this->responseRendererStub->getHttpResponseCode());+ self::assertFalse($this->responseRendererStub->hasSuccessState());+ self::assertSame(['message' => $message->getDisplay()], $this->responseRendererStub->getJSONResult()); } }
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't find any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be test code improvements, specifically changing `assertEquals` to `assertSame` and updating the assertion method calls to use `self::` instead of `$this->`. These are test quality improvements rather than security fixes. Here's the structured response: Vulnerability Existed: no [No security vulnerability found] [test/classes/Controllers/Server/Privileges/AccountLockControllerTest.php] [Lines 64-92] [Old test assertions using $this->assertEquals()] [Fixed test assertions using self::assertSame()] The changes are related to test code quality and consistency, not security fixes. The modifications: 1. Changed assertion method calls from instance ($this->) to static (self::) calls 2. Replaced assertEquals with assertSame for more strict comparisons 3. Maintained the same test logic and assertions
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/js/src/console.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/js/src/console.js@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ * @return {void} */ mouseUp: function () {- Console.setConfig('Height', ConsoleResizer.resultHeight);+ Console.setConfig('Height', Math.round(ConsoleResizer.resultHeight)); Console.show(); $(document).off('mousemove'); $(document).off('mouseup');@@ -1466,8 +1466,9 @@ ) ); if (url) {+ var decodedUrl = new URLSearchParams(url.split('?')[1]); $('#debug_console').find('.debug>.welcome').append(- $('<span class="script_name">').text(url.split('?')[0])+ $('<span class="script_name">').text(decodedUrl.has('route') ? decodedUrl.get('route') : url) ); }
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff for security fixes:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential XSS Vulnerability] [js/src/console.js] [Lines 1466-1469]
[Old Code]
```javascript
$('#debug_console').find('.debug>.welcome').append(
$('<span class="script_name">').text(url.split('?')[0])
);
```
[Fixed Code]
```javascript
var decodedUrl = new URLSearchParams(url.split('?')[1]);
$('#debug_console').find('.debug>.welcome').append(
$('<span class="script_name">').text(decodedUrl.has('route') ? decodedUrl.get('route') : url)
);
```
Additional Details: The change introduces URL parameter parsing and checks for a 'route' parameter. While this might be a security improvement against XSS by properly handling URL parameters, we can't be certain without seeing the full context of how the URL is generated and used.
2. Vulnerability Existed: no
[Non-security bug fix] [js/src/console.js] [Lines 487]
[Old Code]
```javascript
Console.setConfig('Height', ConsoleResizer.resultHeight);
```
[Fixed Code]
```javascript
Console.setConfig('Height', Math.round(ConsoleResizer.resultHeight));
```
Additional Details: This appears to be a simple precision fix for height calculation, not related to security.
Note: The first change might be addressing a potential XSS vulnerability by properly parsing and handling URL parameters, but without more context about how the URL is generated and used, we can't be certain if this was actually fixing a security issue or just improving code quality. The second change is clearly a non-security related bug fix.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/Plugins/TwoFactor/WebAuthnTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/Plugins/TwoFactor/WebAuthnTest.php@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ { public function testIdNameAndDescription(): void {- $this->assertSame('WebAuthn', WebAuthn::$id);- $this->assertSame('Hardware Security Key (WebAuthn/FIDO2)', WebAuthn::getName());- $this->assertSame(+ self::assertSame('WebAuthn', WebAuthn::$id);+ self::assertSame('Hardware Security Key (WebAuthn/FIDO2)', WebAuthn::getName());+ self::assertSame( 'Provides authentication using hardware security tokens supporting the WebAuthn/FIDO2 protocol,' . ' such as a YubiKey.', WebAuthn::getDescription()@@ -83,18 +83,18 @@ $actual = $webAuthn->render(); $optionsFromSession = $_SESSION['WebAuthnCredentialRequestOptions'] ?? null;- $this->assertIsString($optionsFromSession);- $this->assertJson($optionsFromSession);- $this->assertEquals($expectedRequestOptions, json_decode($optionsFromSession, true));-- $this->assertStringContainsString('id="webauthn_request_response"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="webauthn_request_response"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('value=""', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('data-request-options="', $actual);- $this->assertSame('', $webAuthn->getError());+ self::assertIsString($optionsFromSession);+ self::assertJson($optionsFromSession);+ self::assertSame($expectedRequestOptions, json_decode($optionsFromSession, true));++ self::assertStringContainsString('id="webauthn_request_response"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="webauthn_request_response"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('value=""', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('data-request-options="', $actual);+ self::assertSame('', $webAuthn->getError()); $files = ResponseRenderer::getInstance()->getHeader()->getScripts()->getFiles();- $this->assertContains('webauthn.js', array_column($files, 'name'));+ self::assertContains('webauthn.js', array_column($files, 'name')); } public function testSetup(): void@@ -134,18 +134,18 @@ $actual = $webAuthn->setup(); $optionsFromSession = $_SESSION['WebAuthnCredentialCreationOptions'] ?? null;- $this->assertIsString($optionsFromSession);- $this->assertJson($optionsFromSession);- $this->assertEquals($expectedCreationOptions, json_decode($optionsFromSession, true));-- $this->assertStringContainsString('id="webauthn_creation_response"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="webauthn_creation_response"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('value=""', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('data-creation-options="', $actual);- $this->assertSame('', $webAuthn->getError());+ self::assertIsString($optionsFromSession);+ self::assertJson($optionsFromSession);+ self::assertSame($expectedCreationOptions, json_decode($optionsFromSession, true));++ self::assertStringContainsString('id="webauthn_creation_response"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="webauthn_creation_response"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('value=""', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('data-creation-options="', $actual);+ self::assertSame('', $webAuthn->getError()); $files = ResponseRenderer::getInstance()->getHeader()->getScripts()->getFiles();- $this->assertContains('webauthn.js', array_column($files, 'name'));+ self::assertContains('webauthn.js', array_column($files, 'name')); } public function testConfigure(): void@@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ $request->method('getParsedBodyParam')->willReturnMap([['webauthn_creation_response', '', '']]); $GLOBALS['request'] = $request; $webAuthn = new WebAuthn($this->createStub(TwoFactor::class));- $this->assertFalse($webAuthn->configure());- $this->assertSame('', $webAuthn->getError());+ self::assertFalse($webAuthn->configure());+ self::assertSame('', $webAuthn->getError()); } public function testConfigure2(): void@@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ $request->method('getParsedBodyParam')->willReturnMap([['webauthn_creation_response', '', '{}']]); $GLOBALS['request'] = $request; $webAuthn = new WebAuthn($this->createStub(TwoFactor::class));- $this->assertFalse($webAuthn->configure());- $this->assertStringContainsString('Two-factor authentication failed:', $webAuthn->getError());+ self::assertFalse($webAuthn->configure());+ self::assertStringContainsString('Two-factor authentication failed:', $webAuthn->getError()); } public function testConfigure3(): void@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ $webAuthn = new WebAuthn($this->createStub(TwoFactor::class)); $webAuthn->setServer($server);- $this->assertFalse($webAuthn->configure());- $this->assertStringContainsString('Two-factor authentication failed.', $webAuthn->getError());+ self::assertFalse($webAuthn->configure());+ self::assertStringContainsString('Two-factor authentication failed.', $webAuthn->getError()); } public function testConfigure4(): void@@ -208,19 +208,16 @@ $webAuthn = new WebAuthn($twoFactor); $webAuthn->setServer($server);- $this->assertTrue($webAuthn->configure());+ self::assertTrue($webAuthn->configure()); /** @psalm-var array{backend: string, settings: mixed[]} $config */ $config = $twoFactor->config;- $this->assertSame(- [- 'backend' => '',- 'settings' => [- 'userHandle' => 'userHandle',- 'credentials' => ['cHVibGljS2V5Q3JlZGVudGlhbElkMQ==' => $credential],- ],+ self::assertSame([+ 'backend' => '',+ 'settings' => [+ 'userHandle' => 'userHandle',+ 'credentials' => ['cHVibGljS2V5Q3JlZGVudGlhbElkMQ==' => $credential], ],- $config- );+ ], $config); } public function testCheck(): void@@ -230,8 +227,8 @@ $request->method('getParsedBodyParam')->willReturnMap([['webauthn_request_response', '', '']]); $GLOBALS['request'] = $request; $webAuthn = new WebAuthn($this->createStub(TwoFactor::class));- $this->assertFalse($webAuthn->check());- $this->assertSame('', $webAuthn->getError());+ self::assertFalse($webAuthn->check());+ self::assertSame('', $webAuthn->getError()); } public function testCheck2(): void@@ -241,8 +238,8 @@ $request->method('getParsedBodyParam')->willReturnMap([['webauthn_request_response', '', '{}']]); $GLOBALS['request'] = $request; $webAuthn = new WebAuthn($this->createStub(TwoFactor::class));- $this->assertFalse($webAuthn->check());- $this->assertStringContainsString('Two-factor authentication failed:', $webAuthn->getError());+ self::assertFalse($webAuthn->check());+ self::assertStringContainsString('Two-factor authentication failed:', $webAuthn->getError()); } public function testCheck3(): void@@ -258,8 +255,8 @@ $webAuthn = new WebAuthn($this->createStub(TwoFactor::class)); $webAuthn->setServer($server);- $this->assertFalse($webAuthn->check());- $this->assertStringContainsString('Two-factor authentication failed.', $webAuthn->getError());+ self::assertFalse($webAuthn->check());+ self::assertStringContainsString('Two-factor authentication failed.', $webAuthn->getError()); } public function testCheck4(): void@@ -294,6 +291,6 @@ $webAuthn = new WebAuthn($twoFactor); $webAuthn->setServer($server);- $this->assertTrue($webAuthn->check());+ self::assertTrue($webAuthn->check()); } }
After analyzing the provided code diff, I can identify the following potential security-related changes: 1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Assertion Method Change] [test/classes/Plugins/TwoFactor/WebAuthnTest.php] [Multiple lines] [Old Code using $this->assert...()] [Fixed Code using self::assert...()] 2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [JSON Comparison Strictness] [test/classes/Plugins/TwoFactor/WebAuthnTest.php] [Lines 86, 137] [Old Code using assertEquals()] [Fixed Code using assertSame()] The changes appear to be primarily test-related improvements rather than direct security fixes. The main modifications are: 1. Changing assertion methods from instance-based ($this->assert) to static (self::assert) 2. Making JSON comparisons more strict by using assertSame() instead of assertEquals() While these changes improve test reliability and strictness, they don't appear to address any specific known vulnerabilities. The modifications could potentially help catch more subtle bugs in the WebAuthn implementation, but there's no clear evidence they fix any existing security issues.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/IpAllowDenyTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/IpAllowDenyTest.php@@ -62,10 +62,7 @@ $_SERVER['TEST_FORWARDED_HEADER'] = $header; }- $this->assertEquals(- $expected,- Core::getIp()- );+ self::assertSame($expected, Core::getIp()); unset($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']); unset($_SERVER['TEST_FORWARDED_HEADER']);@@ -77,7 +74,7 @@ * * @return array */- public function proxyIPs(): array+ public static function proxyIPs(): array { return [ // Nothing set@@ -128,62 +125,42 @@ //IPV4 testing $testRange = '255.255.0.0/8'; $ipToTest = '10.0.0.0';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); $testRange = '255.255.0.0/4'; $ipToTest = '255.3.0.0';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); $testRange = '255.255.0.[0-10]'; $ipToTest = '255.3.0.3';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); $ipToTest = '255.3.0.12';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); //IPV6 testing //not range $ipToTest = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1020'; $testRange = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1020';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); $ipToTest = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1020'; $testRange = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:2020';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); //range $ipToTest = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1020'; $testRange = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:[1001-2010]';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); $ipToTest = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:3020'; $testRange = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:[1001-2010]';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); //CDIR $ipToTest = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1020'; $testRange = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:[1001-2010]';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); $ipToTest = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1000'; $testRange = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:3020/24';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->ipMaskTest($testRange, $ipToTest)); } /**@@ -192,44 +169,26 @@ public function testAllowDeny(): void { $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->allow()- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->allow()); $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '255.0.1.0';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->allow()- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->allow()); $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '10.0.0.0';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->allow()- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->allow()); $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '255.255.0.1';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->deny()- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->deny()); $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '255.124.0.5';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->deny()- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->deny()); $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '122.124.0.5';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->deny()- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->deny()); //IPV6 $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1020';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->allow()- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->allow()); $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1000';- $this->assertFalse(- $this->ipAllowDeny->allow()- );+ self::assertFalse($this->ipAllowDeny->allow()); $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] = '2001:4998:c:a0d:0000:0000:4998:1020';- $this->assertTrue(- $this->ipAllowDeny->allow()- );+ self::assertTrue($this->ipAllowDeny->allow()); } }
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't find any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be primarily test code improvements and style changes. Here's the analysis: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no Test Code Improvement [File] [Lines 62-64, 125-169, etc.] Old Code: Various assertions using `$this->assertEquals()` and multi-line assertion formats Fixed Code: Changed to use `self::assertSame()` and more concise assertion formats 2. Vulnerability Existed: no Method Visibility Change [File] [Lines 77-80] Old Code: `public function proxyIPs(): array` Fixed Code: `public static function proxyIPs(): array` The changes are focused on: - Using more appropriate assertion methods (`assertSame` instead of `assertEquals`) - Making test methods static where appropriate - Improving code readability by making assertions more concise - No changes to actual security-related logic or IP handling functionality These appear to be test quality improvements rather than security fixes. The IP allow/deny test cases remain functionally the same, just with different assertion styles.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/libraries/classes/Version.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/libraries/classes/Version.php@@ -14,12 +14,12 @@ final class Version { // The VERSION_SUFFIX constant is defined at libraries/constants.php- public const VERSION = '5.2.1' . VERSION_SUFFIX;+ public const VERSION = '5.2.2' . VERSION_SUFFIX; public const SERIES = '5.2'; public const MAJOR = 5; public const MINOR = 2;- public const PATCH = 1;- public const ID = 50201;+ public const PATCH = 2;+ public const ID = 50202; public const PRE_RELEASE_NAME = ''; public const IS_DEV = false; }
Based on the provided diff, this appears to be a standard version update rather than a security fix. Here's the analysis following your requested format:
Vulnerability Existed: no
Version Update [File] [Lines 14-19]
[Old Code]
public const VERSION = '5.2.1' . VERSION_SUFFIX;
public const SERIES = '5.2';
public const MAJOR = 5;
public const MINOR = 2;
public const PATCH = 1;
public const ID = 50201;
[Fixed Code]
public const VERSION = '5.2.2' . VERSION_SUFFIX;
public const SERIES = '5.2';
public const MAJOR = 5;
public const MINOR = 2;
public const PATCH = 2;
public const ID = 50202;
Additional Details:
- This is simply a version number update from 5.2.1 to 5.2.2
- No security vulnerabilities are apparent in this diff
- The changes are consistent with a minor version bump (patch number increment)
- No code logic or security-related functionality was modified
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/Utils/FormatConverterTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/Utils/FormatConverterTest.php@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ public function testBinaryToIp(string $expected, string $input, bool $isBinary): void { $result = FormatConverter::binaryToIp($input, $isBinary);- $this->assertEquals($expected, $result);+ self::assertSame($expected, $result); } /**@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ * * @return array */- public function providerBinaryToIp(): array+ public static function providerBinaryToIp(): array { // expected // input@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ public function testIpToBinary(string $expected, string $input): void { $result = FormatConverter::ipToBinary($input);- $this->assertEquals($expected, $result);+ self::assertSame($expected, $result); } /**@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ * * @return array */- public function providerIpToBinary(): array+ public static function providerIpToBinary(): array { return [ [@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ public function testIpToLong(string $expected, string $input): void { $result = FormatConverter::ipToLong($input);- $this->assertEquals($expected, $result);+ self::assertEquals($expected, $result); } /**@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ * * @return array */- public function providerIpToLong(): array+ public static function providerIpToLong(): array { return [ [@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ public function testLongToIp(string $expected, string $input): void { $result = FormatConverter::longToIp($input);- $this->assertEquals($expected, $result);+ self::assertSame($expected, $result); } /**@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ * * @return array */- public function providerLongToIp(): array+ public static function providerLongToIp(): array { return [ [
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't find any security-related fixes. The changes appear to be test improvements and code style updates. Here's the analysis: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no Test Assertion Improvement [File] [Lines 26, 94, 127, 160] Old Code: `$this->assertEquals($expected, $result);` Fixed Code: `self::assertSame($expected, $result);` (Note: This is not a security fix but rather a test improvement to use strict comparison) 2. Vulnerability Existed: no Method Visibility Change [File] [Lines 34, 102, 135, 168] Old Code: `public function providerBinaryToIp(): array` Fixed Code: `public static function providerBinaryToIp(): array` (Note: This is not a security fix but rather a change to make test data providers static) The changes are focused on test quality improvements rather than security fixes. The main changes are: 1. Using `assertSame()` instead of `assertEquals()` for more precise testing 2. Making test data provider methods static for better practice No security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/libraries/classes/Mime.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/libraries/classes/Mime.php@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ return 'image/gif'; }- if ($len >= 4 && mb_substr($test, 0, 4) == "\x89PNG") {+ if ($len >= 4 && mb_substr($test, 0, 4, '8bit') === "\x89PNG") { return 'image/png'; }
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff: Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential Binary Data Handling Issue] [libraries/classes/Mime.php] [Lines 37] [Old Code] `if ($len >= 4 && mb_substr($test, 0, 4) == "\x89PNG")` [Fixed Code] `if ($len >= 4 && mb_substr($test, 0, 4, '8bit') === "\x89PNG")` Additional Details: 1. The change adds explicit '8bit' encoding parameter to mb_substr() when checking PNG file signatures 2. The comparison operator was changed from == to === for strict comparison 3. While not clearly a security fix, this could potentially prevent issues with binary data interpretation 4. The change improves reliability of PNG file type detection but doesn't clearly fix a known vulnerability
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/js/src/home.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/js/src/home.js@@ -105,13 +105,15 @@ 'server': CommonParams.get('server'), 'ajax_request': true, 'no_debug': true- },- function (data) {- if (typeof data !== 'undefined' && data.success === true) {- $(data.message).insertAfter('#li_pma_version');- } }- );+ ).done(function (data) {+ if (typeof data !== 'undefined' && data.success === true) {+ $(data.message).insertAfter('#li_pma_version');+ }+ }).fail(function () {+ const gitHashInfoLi = '<li id="li_pma_version_git" class="list-group-item">' + window.Messages.errorLoadingGitInformation + '</li>';+ $(gitHashInfoLi).insertAfter('#li_pma_version');+ }); } };@@ -121,9 +123,15 @@ AJAX.registerOnload('home.js', function () { $('#themesModal').on('show.bs.modal', function () {- $.get('index.php?route=/themes', function (data) {- $('#themesModal .modal-body').html(data.themes);- });+ $.get(+ 'index.php?route=/themes',+ {+ 'server': CommonParams.get('server'),+ },+ function (data) {+ $('#themesModal .modal-body').html(data.themes);+ }+ ); }); /**
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff for security fixes:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential XSS Vulnerability] [js/src/home.js] [Lines 105-115]
[Old Code]
function (data) {
if (typeof data !== 'undefined' && data.success === true) {
$(data.message).insertAfter('#li_pma_version');
}
}
[Fixed Code]
).done(function (data) {
if (typeof data !== 'undefined' && data.success === true) {
$(data.message).insertAfter('#li_pma_version');
}
}).fail(function () {
const gitHashInfoLi = '<li id="li_pma_version_git" class="list-group-item">' + window.Messages.errorLoadingGitInformation + '</li>';
$(gitHashInfoLi).insertAfter('#li_pma_version');
});
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Missing Server Parameter in AJAX Request] [js/src/home.js] [Lines 121-129]
[Old Code]
$.get('index.php?route=/themes', function (data) {
$('#themesModal .modal-body').html(data.themes);
});
[Fixed Code]
$.get(
'index.php?route=/themes',
{
'server': CommonParams.get('server'),
},
function (data) {
$('#themesModal .modal-body').html(data.themes);
}
);
The changes appear to be:
1. Adding error handling for AJAX requests and potentially making the code more robust against failed requests
2. Adding server parameter to AJAX requests which might be related to session handling or security context
While these changes improve the code's robustness, I can't definitively identify specific vulnerabilities being fixed without more context about the application's security model. The changes could be related to:
- Preventing potential XSS if error messages aren't properly escaped
- Ensuring proper session handling by including server parameters
- Making AJAX requests more reliable and secure
However, without seeing the complete security context or knowing about specific vulnerabilities in the previous version, I can't be certain these were security fixes versus general code improvements.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/libraries/classes/Core.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/libraries/classes/Core.php@@ -683,6 +683,8 @@ 'www.github.com', /* Percona domains */ 'www.percona.com',+ /* CVE domain */+ 'www.cve.org', /* Following are doubtful ones. */ 'mysqldatabaseadministration.blogspot.com', ];
Based on the provided code diff, here's the analysis:
Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Unspecified CVE-related domain addition] [libraries/classes/Core.php] [Lines 683-686]
[Old Code]
```php
'www.percona.com',
/* Following are doubtful ones. */
```
[Fixed Code]
```php
'www.percona.com',
/* CVE domain */
'www.cve.org',
/* Following are doubtful ones. */
```
Additional Details:
1. The change adds 'www.cve.org' to a list of allowed/recognized domains
2. The comment suggests this is related to CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures)
3. Without more context about how this list is used, we can't determine if this fixes a specific vulnerability or is just adding a reference domain
4. The change appears to be adding a trusted domain rather than fixing a security flaw directly
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/libraries/classes/Controllers/Table/ZoomSearchController.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/libraries/classes/Controllers/Table/ZoomSearchController.php@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ use PhpMyAdmin\Util; use PhpMyAdmin\Utils\Gis;+use function array_map; use function array_search; use function array_values; use function count;@@ -115,7 +116,9 @@ 'vendor/jqplot/plugins/jqplot.highlighter.js', 'vendor/jqplot/plugins/jqplot.cursor.js', 'table/zoom_plot_jqplot.js',+ 'table/select.js', 'table/change.js',+ 'gis_data_editor.js', ]); /**@@ -375,6 +378,10 @@ $column_names_hashes[$columnName] = md5($columnName); }+ $columnDataTypes = array_map(static function (string $type): string {+ return strtoupper((string) preg_replace('@\(.*@s', '', $type));+ }, $this->columnTypes);+ $this->render('table/zoom_search/result_form', [ 'db' => $this->db, 'table' => $this->table,@@ -383,6 +390,7 @@ 'foreigners' => $this->foreigners, 'column_null_flags' => $this->columnNullFlags, 'column_types' => $this->columnTypes,+ 'column_data_types' => $columnDataTypes, 'goto' => $goto, 'data' => $data, 'data_json' => json_encode($data),
Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze the changes for potential security fixes:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) or Data Validation] [libraries/classes/Controllers/Table/ZoomSearchController.php] [Lines 375-383]
[Old Code]
No explicit data type processing for column types before passing to view
[Fixed Code]
Added column data type processing with array_map and regex sanitization:
$columnDataTypes = array_map(static function (string $type): string {
return strtoupper((string) preg_replace('@\(.*@s', '', $type));
}, $this->columnTypes);
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Missing Resource Loading] [libraries/classes/Controllers/Table/ZoomSearchController.php] [Lines 115-118]
[Old Code]
Only loading basic jqplot and change.js files
[Fixed Code]
Added additional required resources:
'table/select.js',
'gis_data_editor.js',
The first change appears to add sanitization/processing of column data types before they're used in the view, which could help prevent XSS or other injection attacks if these values were user-controlled. The second change adds additional JavaScript files that might include security-related functionality, though without seeing their contents, I can't be certain.
Both changes appear to be security-related improvements, but without more context about how these values are used or what vulnerabilities were being addressed, I can't definitively identify specific vulnerabilities.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/js/src/server/privileges.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/js/src/server/privileges.js@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ * @return {bool} whether the form is validated or not */ function checkAddUser (theForm) {- if (theForm.elements.hostname.value === '') {+ if (theForm.elements.hostname && theForm.elements.hostname.value === '') { alert(Messages.strHostEmpty); theForm.elements.hostname.focus(); return false;
Let me analyze the code diff for security fixes.
Vulnerability Existed: yes
Null Pointer Dereference [File] js/src/server/privileges.js [Lines] 16
[Old Code]
if (theForm.elements.hostname.value === '') {
[Fixed Code]
if (theForm.elements.hostname && theForm.elements.hostname.value === '') {
Additional Details:
The vulnerability was a potential null pointer dereference where the code could crash if theForm.elements.hostname was undefined or null. The fix adds a check for the existence of hostname before accessing its value property. This prevents JavaScript errors that could potentially be exploited to disrupt application functionality. While not a direct security vulnerability in terms of data compromise, it does fix a robustness issue that could lead to denial of service scenarios.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/Controllers/Server/DatabasesControllerTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/Controllers/Server/DatabasesControllerTest.php@@ -66,21 +66,21 @@ $this->assertAllSelectsConsumed(); $actual = $response->getHTMLResult();- $this->assertStringContainsString('data-filter-row="SAKILA"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('sakila', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('utf8_general_ci', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('title="Unicode, case-insensitive"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('data-filter-row="SAKILA"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('employees', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('latin1_swedish_ci', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('title="Swedish, case-insensitive"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('<span id="filter-rows-count">2</span>', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="pos" value="0"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="sort_by" value="SCHEMA_NAME"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="sort_order" value="asc"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString(__('Enable statistics'), $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString(__('No privileges to create databases'), $actual);- $this->assertStringNotContainsString(__('Indexes'), $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('data-filter-row="SAKILA"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('sakila', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('utf8_general_ci', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('title="Unicode, case-insensitive"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('data-filter-row="SAKILA"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('employees', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('latin1_swedish_ci', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('title="Swedish, case-insensitive"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('<span id="filter-rows-count">2</span>', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="pos" value="0"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="sort_by" value="SCHEMA_NAME"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="sort_order" value="asc"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString(__('Enable statistics'), $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString(__('No privileges to create databases'), $actual);+ self::assertStringNotContainsString(__('Indexes'), $actual); $response = new ResponseRenderer();@@ -103,16 +103,16 @@ $this->assertAllSelectsConsumed(); $actual = $response->getHTMLResult();- $this->assertStringNotContainsString(__('Enable statistics'), $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString(__('Indexes'), $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="sort_by" value="SCHEMA_TABLES"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="sort_order" value="desc"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="statistics" value="1"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('title="3912174"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('3,912,174', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('title="4358144"', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('4.2', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('MiB', $actual);- $this->assertStringContainsString('name="db_collation"', $actual);+ self::assertStringNotContainsString(__('Enable statistics'), $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString(__('Indexes'), $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="sort_by" value="SCHEMA_TABLES"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="sort_order" value="desc"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="statistics" value="1"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('title="3912174"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('3,912,174', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('title="4358144"', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('4.2', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('MiB', $actual);+ self::assertStringContainsString('name="db_collation"', $actual); } }
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't find any security-related changes. The changes are purely test-related modifications where assertion methods were updated from `$this->assert...` to `self::assert...` style. Here's the analysis:
Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [File] test/classes/Controllers/Server/DatabasesControllerTest.php [Lines] 66-103
[Old Code]
$this->assertStringContainsString('data-filter-row="SAKILA"', $actual);
[Fixed Code]
self::assertStringContainsString('data-filter-row="SAKILA"', $actual);
The changes are stylistic/refactoring changes to the test assertions and don't indicate any security fixes. The test assertions remain functionally identical, just using a different calling style. No security vulnerabilities were addressed in this diff.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/js/src/database/triggers.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/js/src/database/triggers.js@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ classes: { 'ui-dialog-titlebar-close': 'btn-close' },- width: 700,+ width: '70%', minWidth: 500, buttons: buttonOptions, // Issue #15810 - use button titles for modals (eg: new procedure)@@ -339,8 +339,7 @@ * the Definition textarea. */ var $elm = $('textarea[name=item_definition]').last();- var linterOptions = {};- linterOptions.triggerEditor = true;+ var linterOptions = { editorType: 'trigger' }; that.syntaxHiglighter = Functions.getSqlEditor($elm, {}, 'both', linterOptions); } else { Functions.ajaxShowMessage(data.error, false);
I'll analyze the provided code diff for security fixes following the specified format.
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential XSS Vulnerability] [js/src/database/triggers.js] [Lines 300-339]
[Old Code]
classes: {
'ui-dialog-titlebar-close': 'btn-close'
},
width: 700,
minWidth: 500,
buttons: buttonOptions,
// Issue #15810 - use button titles for modals (eg: new procedure)
[...]
var $elm = $('textarea[name=item_definition]').last();
var linterOptions = {};
linterOptions.triggerEditor = true;
that.syntaxHiglighter = Functions.getSqlEditor($elm, {}, 'both', linterOptions);
[Fixed Code]
classes: {
'ui-dialog-titlebar-close': 'btn-close'
},
width: '70%',
minWidth: 500,
buttons: buttonOptions,
// Issue #15810 - use button titles for modals (eg: new procedure)
[...]
var $elm = $('textarea[name=item_definition]').last();
var linterOptions = { editorType: 'trigger' };
that.syntaxHiglighter = Functions.getSqlEditor($elm, {}, 'both', linterOptions);
Additional Details:
- The changes appear to be more about UI/editor configuration than direct security fixes
- The modification from fixed width (700) to percentage width ('70%') seems like a UI improvement
- The change in linter options configuration (from triggerEditor: true to editorType: 'trigger') might be related to better input validation in the SQL editor, but this is not clearly a security fix
- No obvious security vulnerabilities are being fixed in this diff
- The changes don't show any clear mitigation of known vulnerabilities like XSS, SQLi, etc.
Note: Without more context about the Functions.getSqlEditor implementation, it's hard to determine if the linterOptions change has security implications. The changes seem primarily focused on functionality and UI improvements rather than security fixes.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/Plugins/Import/ImportXmlTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/Plugins/Import/ImportXmlTest.php@@ -63,23 +63,11 @@ public function testGetProperties(): void { $properties = $this->object->getProperties();- $this->assertEquals(- __('XML'),- $properties->getText()- );- $this->assertEquals(- 'xml',- $properties->getExtension()- );- $this->assertEquals(- 'text/xml',- $properties->getMimeType()- );- $this->assertNull($properties->getOptions());- $this->assertEquals(- __('Options'),- $properties->getOptionsText()- );+ self::assertSame(__('XML'), $properties->getText());+ self::assertSame('xml', $properties->getExtension());+ self::assertSame('text/xml', $properties->getMimeType());+ self::assertNull($properties->getOptions());+ self::assertSame(__('Options'), $properties->getOptionsText()); } /**@@ -119,14 +107,14 @@ */ //asset that all databases and tables are imported- $this->assertStringContainsString(+ self::assertStringContainsString( 'The following structures have either been created or altered.', $import_notice );- $this->assertStringContainsString('Go to database: `phpmyadmintest`', $import_notice);- $this->assertStringContainsString('Edit settings for `phpmyadmintest`', $import_notice);- $this->assertStringContainsString('Go to table: `pma_bookmarktest`', $import_notice);- $this->assertStringContainsString('Edit settings for `pma_bookmarktest`', $import_notice);- $this->assertTrue($GLOBALS['finished']);+ self::assertStringContainsString('Go to database: `phpmyadmintest`', $import_notice);+ self::assertStringContainsString('Edit settings for `phpmyadmintest`', $import_notice);+ self::assertStringContainsString('Go to table: `pma_bookmarktest`', $import_notice);+ self::assertStringContainsString('Edit settings for `pma_bookmarktest`', $import_notice);+ self::assertTrue($GLOBALS['finished']); } }
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security-related changes. The changes appear to be primarily test code improvements and assertions updates. Here's the analysis: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no The changes are test assertion updates from `assertEquals` to `assertSame` and formatting improvements. No security vulnerability is being fixed here. 2. Vulnerability Existed: no The second set of changes updates test assertions to use `self::assertStringContainsString` instead of `$this->assertStringContainsString` and makes similar style improvements. Again, no security vulnerability is being addressed. The diff shows test code refactoring and modernization (changing assertion methods and improving code style), but doesn't indicate any security fixes. The functionality being tested remains the same, only the test assertions are being updated to use more appropriate assertion methods.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/libraries/classes/Navigation/Nodes/NodeDatabase.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/libraries/classes/Navigation/Nodes/NodeDatabase.php@@ -12,9 +12,10 @@ use PhpMyAdmin\Util; use function __;+use function array_slice; use function in_array;-use function intval; use function substr;+use function usort; /** * Represents a database node in the navigation tree@@ -439,7 +440,6 @@ } $query .= 'ORDER BY `TABLE_NAME` ASC ';- $query .= 'LIMIT ' . $pos . ', ' . $maxItems; $retval = $dbi->fetchResult($query); } else { $query = ' SHOW FULL TABLES FROM ';@@ -453,21 +453,15 @@ $handle = $dbi->tryQuery($query); if ($handle !== false) {- $count = 0;- if ($handle->seek($pos)) {- while ($arr = $handle->fetchRow()) {- if ($count >= $maxItems) {- break;- }-- $retval[] = $arr[0];- $count++;- }- }- }- }-- return $retval;+ $retval = $handle->fetchAllColumn();+ }+ }++ if ($GLOBALS['cfg']['NaturalOrder']) {+ usort($retval, 'strnatcasecmp');+ }++ return array_slice($retval, $pos, $maxItems); } /**@@ -526,7 +520,6 @@ } $query .= 'ORDER BY `ROUTINE_NAME` ASC ';- $query .= 'LIMIT ' . intval($pos) . ', ' . $maxItems; $retval = $dbi->fetchResult($query); } else { $escdDb = $dbi->escapeString($db);@@ -539,21 +532,17 @@ $handle = $dbi->tryQuery($query); if ($handle !== false) {- $count = 0;- if ($handle->seek($pos)) {- while ($arr = $handle->fetchAssoc()) {- if ($count >= $maxItems) {- break;- }-- $retval[] = $arr['Name'];- $count++;- }+ while ($arr = $handle->fetchAssoc()) {+ $retval[] = $arr['Name']; } } }- return $retval;+ if ($GLOBALS['cfg']['NaturalOrder']) {+ usort($retval, 'strnatcasecmp');+ }++ return array_slice($retval, $pos, $maxItems); } /**@@ -610,7 +599,6 @@ } $query .= 'ORDER BY `EVENT_NAME` ASC ';- $query .= 'LIMIT ' . intval($pos) . ', ' . $maxItems; $retval = $dbi->fetchResult($query); } else { $escdDb = Util::backquote($db);@@ -623,21 +611,17 @@ $handle = $dbi->tryQuery($query); if ($handle !== false) {- $count = 0;- if ($handle->seek($pos)) {- while ($arr = $handle->fetchAssoc()) {- if ($count >= $maxItems) {- break;- }-- $retval[] = $arr['Name'];- $count++;- }+ while ($arr = $handle->fetchAssoc()) {+ $retval[] = $arr['Name']; } } }- return $retval;+ if ($GLOBALS['cfg']['NaturalOrder']) {+ usort($retval, 'strnatcasecmp');+ }++ return array_slice($retval, $pos, $maxItems); } /**
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff following the specified format: 1. Vulnerability Existed: yes SQL Injection Vulnerability [File] [Lines 439, 526, 610] [Old Code] `$query .= 'LIMIT ' . $pos . ', ' . $maxItems;` `$query .= 'LIMIT ' . intval($pos) . ', ' . $maxItems;` [Fixed Code] Removed direct LIMIT clause concatenation and replaced with `array_slice($retval, $pos, $maxItems)` 2. Vulnerability Existed: yes Insecure Data Handling [File] [Lines 453-465, 539-545, 623-629] [Old Code] Manual row fetching with seek() and count-based limit checking [Fixed Code] Using `fetchAllColumn()` and `fetchAssoc()` with array_slice() for safer data handling 3. Vulnerability Existed: not sure Potential Information Disclosure [File] [Lines 453-465, 539-545, 623-629] [Old Code] Manual result set processing with potential error conditions [Fixed Code] More robust result handling with built-in methods The main security improvements are: 1. Removal of direct SQL string concatenation for LIMIT clauses which could be vulnerable to SQL injection 2. Replacement with PHP-side array slicing which is safer 3. More robust result set handling using database abstraction layer methods 4. Added natural sorting functionality in a safer way The changes suggest the original code had potential SQL injection vectors through the LIMIT clauses and less secure result handling, which have been addressed by moving the pagination logic to PHP side operations.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/js/src/export.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/js/src/export.js@@ -727,16 +727,22 @@ limit = limit + 1; clearTimeout(timeOut); timeOut = setTimeout(function () {- $.get('index.php?route=/export/check-time-out', { 'ajax_request': true }, function (data) {- if (data.message === 'timeout') {- Functions.ajaxShowMessage(- '<div class="alert alert-danger" role="alert">' +- Messages.strTimeOutError +- '</div>',- false- );- }- });+ $.get('index.php?route=/export/check-time-out',+ {+ 'ajax_request': true,+ 'server': CommonParams.get('server')+ },+ function (data) {+ if (data.message === 'timeout') {+ Functions.ajaxShowMessage(+ '<div class="alert alert-danger" role="alert">' ++ Messages.strTimeOutError ++ '</div>',+ false+ );+ }+ }+ ); }, limit * 1000); };
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:
Vulnerability Existed: yes
Missing Server Parameter in AJAX Request [File] js/src/export.js [Lines 727-743]
[Old Code]
```javascript
$.get('index.php?route=/export/check-time-out', { 'ajax_request': true }, function (data) {
if (data.message === 'timeout') {
Functions.ajaxShowMessage(
'<div class="alert alert-danger" role="alert">' +
Messages.strTimeOutError +
'</div>',
false
);
}
});
```
[Fixed Code]
```javascript
$.get('index.php?route=/export/check-time-out',
{
'ajax_request': true,
'server': CommonParams.get('server')
},
function (data) {
if (data.message === 'timeout') {
Functions.ajaxShowMessage(
'<div class="alert alert-danger" role="alert">' +
Messages.strTimeOutError +
'</div>',
false
);
}
}
);
```
The fix adds the server parameter to the AJAX request, which was missing in the old code. This could potentially lead to security issues where the server-side script might not properly verify the request's origin or context without this parameter. While not a named vulnerability, this falls under the category of "Insufficient Request Validation" or "Missing Context in Request".
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_1/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_1/test/classes/OperationsTest.php+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/phpmyadmin_downloads/RELEASE_5_2_2/phpmyadmin-RELEASE_5_2_2/test/classes/OperationsTest.php@@ -47,13 +47,13 @@ $expected = array_merge($choices, $extraChoice); $actual = $this->object->getPartitionMaintenanceChoices();- $this->assertEquals($expected, $actual);+ self::assertSame($expected, $actual); } /** * @psalm-return array<string, array{0: string, 1: array<string, string>}> */- public function providerGetPartitionMaintenanceChoices(): array+ public static function providerGetPartitionMaintenanceChoices(): array { return [ 'no partition method' => ['no_partition_method', ['COALESCE' => 'Coalesce']],
Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
[Test Assertion Change] [test/classes/OperationsTest.php] [Lines 47]
[Old Code] $this->assertEquals($expected, $actual);
[Fixed Code] self::assertSame($expected, $actual);
Additional Details: This is a test improvement changing assertEquals to assertSame for stricter type checking in tests, not a security fix.
2. Vulnerability Existed: no
[Test Method Visibility Change] [test/classes/OperationsTest.php] [Lines 52]
[Old Code] public function providerGetPartitionMaintenanceChoices(): array
[Fixed Code] public static function providerGetPartitionMaintenanceChoices(): array
Additional Details: This changes a test data provider method to be static, which is a test structure improvement rather than a security fix.
No security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff. The changes appear to be test code improvements rather than security fixes.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the check tables feature. A crafted table or database name could be used for XSS.
An issue was discovered in phpMyAdmin 5.x before 5.2.2. An XSS vulnerability has been discovered for the Insert tab.