--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/apps/meteor/tests/unit/app/livechat/server/lib/sendTranscript.spec.ts+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/apps/meteor/tests/unit/app/livechat/server/lib/sendTranscript.spec.ts@@ -5,9 +5,6 @@ const modelsMock = { 	LivechatRooms: { 		findOneById: sinon.stub(),-	},-	LivechatVisitors: {-		getVisitorByToken: sinon.stub(), 	}, 	Messages: { 		findLivechatClosingMessage: sinon.stub(),@@ -75,7 +72,6 @@ 	beforeEach(() => { 		checkMock.reset(); 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.reset();-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.reset(); 		modelsMock.Messages.findLivechatClosingMessage.reset(); 		modelsMock.Messages.findVisibleByRoomIdNotContainingTypesBeforeTs.reset(); 		modelsMock.Users.findOneById.reset();@@ -87,11 +83,9 @@ 		await expect(sendTranscript({})).to.be.rejectedWith(Error); 	}); 	it('should throw error when visitor not found', async () => {-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves(null); 		await expect(sendTranscript({ rid: 'rid', email: 'email', logger: mockLogger })).to.be.rejectedWith(Error); 	}); 	it('should attempt to send an email when params are valid using default subject', async () => {-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves({ language: null }); 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'l', v: { token: 'token' } }); 		modelsMock.Messages.findVisibleByRoomIdNotContainingTypesBeforeTs.resolves([]); 		tStub.returns('Conversation Transcript');@@ -117,7 +111,6 @@ 		).to.be.true; 	}); 	it('should use provided subject', async () => {-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves({ language: null }); 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'l', v: { token: 'token' } }); 		modelsMock.Messages.findVisibleByRoomIdNotContainingTypesBeforeTs.resolves([]);@@ -143,7 +136,6 @@ 		).to.be.true; 	}); 	it('should use subject from setting (when configured) when no subject provided', async () => {-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves({ language: null }); 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'l', v: { token: 'token' } }); 		modelsMock.Messages.findVisibleByRoomIdNotContainingTypesBeforeTs.resolves([]); 		mockSettingValues.Livechat_transcript_email_subject = 'A custom subject obtained from setting.get';@@ -170,36 +162,63 @@ 	}); 	it('should fail if room provided is invalid', async () => { 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves(null);-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves({ language: null }); 		await expect(sendTranscript({ rid: 'rid', email: 'email', logger: mockLogger })).to.be.rejectedWith(Error); 	}); 	it('should fail if room provided is of different type', async () => { 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'c' });-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves({ language: null }); 		await expect(sendTranscript({ rid: 'rid', email: 'email' })).to.be.rejectedWith(Error); 	}); 	it('should fail if room is of valid type, but doesnt doesnt have `v` property', async () => {-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves({ language: null }); 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'l' }); 		await expect(sendTranscript({ rid: 'rid', email: 'email' })).to.be.rejectedWith(Error); 	}); 	it('should fail if room is of valid type, has `v` prop, but it doesnt contain `token`', async () => {-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves({ language: null }); 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'l', v: { otherProp: 'xxx' } }); 		await expect(sendTranscript({ rid: 'rid', email: 'email' })).to.be.rejectedWith(Error); 	}); 	it('should fail if room is of valid type, has `v.token`, but its different from the one on param (room from another visitor)', async () => {-		modelsMock.LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken.resolves({ language: null }); 		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'l', v: { token: 'xxx' } }); 		await expect(sendTranscript({ rid: 'rid', email: 'email', token: 'xveasdf' })).to.be.rejectedWith(Error); 	});++	it('should throw an error when token is not the one on room.v', async () => {+		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'l', v: { token: 'xxx' } });++		await expect(sendTranscript({ rid: 'rid', email: 'email', token: 'xveasdf' })).to.be.rejectedWith(Error);+	});+	it('should work when token matches room.v', async () => {+		modelsMock.LivechatRooms.findOneById.resolves({ t: 'l', v: { token: 'token-123' } });+		modelsMock.Messages.findVisibleByRoomIdNotContainingTypesBeforeTs.resolves([]);+		delete mockSettingValues.Livechat_transcript_email_subject;+		tStub.returns('Conversation Transcript');++		await sendTranscript({+			rid: 'rid',+			token: 'token-123',+			email: 'email',+			user: { _id: 'x', name: 'x', utcOffset: '-6', username: 'x' },+		});++		expect(getTimezoneMock.calledWith({ _id: 'x', name: 'x', utcOffset: '-6', username: 'x' })).to.be.true;+		expect(modelsMock.Messages.findLivechatClosingMessage.calledWith('rid', { projection: { ts: 1 } })).to.be.true;+		expect(modelsMock.Messages.findVisibleByRoomIdNotContainingTypesBeforeTs.called).to.be.true;+		expect(+			mailerMock.calledWith({+				to: 'email',+				from: '[email protected]',+				subject: 'Conversation Transcript',+				replyTo: '[email protected]',+				html: '<div> <hr></div>',+			}),+		).to.be.true;+	}); });

After analyzing the code diff, I don't see any clear security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be test-related modifications where the visitor token validation logic was restructured, but this doesn't indicate a security fix. Here's the analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No specific vulnerability [File] apps/meteor/tests/unit/app/livechat/server/lib/sendTranscript.spec.ts
   [Old Code] Various test cases involving LivechatVisitors.getVisitorByToken
   [Fixed Code] Removed visitor token validation from tests and added direct room token validation

The changes primarily:
1. Remove the LivechatVisitors mock and related test setups
2. Simplify the test cases to focus on room token validation
3. Add new test cases for token matching scenarios

This appears to be a test refactoring rather than a security fix. The functionality is now testing direct token matching against room.v.token rather than going through the visitor lookup process, but this doesn't represent a vulnerability being fixed.

No CVE or specific vulnerability name is associated with these changes. The modifications seem to be part of normal code maintenance and test improvement.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/apps/meteor/app/otr/server/methods/updateOTRAck.ts+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/apps/meteor/app/otr/server/methods/updateOTRAck.ts@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@ import { api } from '@rocket.chat/core-services'; import type { IOTRMessage } from '@rocket.chat/core-typings'; import type { ServerMethods } from '@rocket.chat/ddp-client';+import { Rooms } from '@rocket.chat/models';+import { check } from 'meteor/check'; import { Meteor } from 'meteor/meteor';++import { canAccessRoomAsync } from '../../../authorization/server/functions/canAccessRoom'; declare module '@rocket.chat/ddp-client' { 	// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/naming-convention@@ -11,10 +15,40 @@ } Meteor.methods<ServerMethods>({-	updateOTRAck({ message, ack }) {-		if (!Meteor.userId()) {+	async updateOTRAck({ message, ack }) {+		const uid = Meteor.userId();+		if (!uid) { 			throw new Meteor.Error('error-invalid-user', 'Invalid user', { method: 'updateOTRAck' }); 		}++		check(ack, String);+		check(message, {+			_id: String,+			rid: String,+			msg: String,+			t: String,+			ts: Date,+			u: {+				_id: String,+				username: String,+				name: String,+			},+		});++		if (message?.t !== 'otr') {+			throw new Meteor.Error('error-invalid-message', 'Invalid message type', { method: 'updateOTRAck' });+		}++		const room = await Rooms.findOneByIdAndType(message.rid, 'd', { projection: { t: 1, _id: 1, uids: 1 } });++		if (!room) {+			throw new Meteor.Error('error-invalid-room', 'Invalid room', { method: 'updateOTRAck' });+		}++		if (!(await canAccessRoomAsync(room, { _id: uid })) || (room.uids && (!message.u._id || !room.uids.includes(message.u._id)))) {+			throw new Meteor.Error('error-invalid-user', 'Invalid user, not in room', { method: 'updateOTRAck' });+		}+ 		const acknowledgeMessage: IOTRMessage = { ...message, otrAck: ack }; 		void api.broadcast('otrAckUpdate', { roomId: message.rid, acknowledgeMessage }); 	},

Here's the analysis of the provided code diff for security fixes:

1. Vulnerability Existed: yes  
   Missing Input Validation [File] apps/meteor/app/otr/server/methods/updateOTRAck.ts [Lines] 11-15  
   [Old Code]  
   ```typescript
   updateOTRAck({ message, ack }) {
       if (!Meteor.userId()) {
           throw new Meteor.Error('error-invalid-user', 'Invalid user', { method: 'updateOTRAck' });
       }
   ```  
   [Fixed Code]  
   ```typescript
   check(ack, String);
   check(message, {
       _id: String,
       rid: String,
       msg: String,
       t: String,
       ts: Date,
       u: {
           _id: String,
           username: String,
           name: String,
       },
   });
   ```

2. Vulnerability Existed: yes  
   Missing Message Type Check [File] apps/meteor/app/otr/server/methods/updateOTRAck.ts [Lines] 15-17  
   [Old Code]  
   ```typescript
   // No message type check existed
   ```  
   [Fixed Code]  
   ```typescript
   if (message?.t !== 'otr') {
       throw new Meteor.Error('error-invalid-message', 'Invalid message type', { method: 'updateOTRAck' });
   }
   ```

3. Vulnerability Existed: yes  
   Missing Room Validation [File] apps/meteor/app/otr/server/methods/updateOTRAck.ts [Lines] 17-21  
   [Old Code]  
   ```typescript
   // No room validation existed
   ```  
   [Fixed Code]  
   ```typescript
   const room = await Rooms.findOneByIdAndType(message.rid, 'd', { projection: { t: 1, _id: 1, uids: 1 } });
   if (!room) {
       throw new Meteor.Error('error-invalid-room', 'Invalid room', { method: 'updateOTRAck' });
   }
   ```

4. Vulnerability Existed: yes  
   Missing User Authorization Check [File] apps/meteor/app/otr/server/methods/updateOTRAck.ts [Lines] 21-23  
   [Old Code]  
   ```typescript
   // No user authorization check existed
   ```  
   [Fixed Code]  
   ```typescript
   if (!(await canAccessRoomAsync(room, { _id: uid })) || (room.uids && (!message.u._id || !room.uids.includes(message.u._id)))) {
       throw new Meteor.Error('error-invalid-user', 'Invalid user, not in room', { method: 'updateOTRAck' });
   }
   ```

The diff shows significant security improvements by adding multiple validation and authorization checks that were previously missing. The changes address potential security vulnerabilities related to input validation, message type verification, room validation, and user authorization.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/ee/apps/omnichannel-transcript/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/ee/apps/omnichannel-transcript/package.json@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript", 	"private": true,-	"version": "0.4.6",+	"version": "0.4.7", 	"description": "Rocket.Chat service", 	"scripts": { 		"build": "tsc -p tsconfig.json",

Based on the provided code diff, here's the analysis:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Dependency Update] [ee/apps/omnichannel-transcript/package.json] [Lines 1-7]
[Old Code]
{
	"name": "@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript",
	"private": true,
	"version": "0.4.6",
	"description": "Rocket.Chat service",
	"scripts": {
		"build": "tsc -p tsconfig.json",
[Fixed Code]
{
	"name": "@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript",
	"private": true,
	"version": "0.4.7",
	"description": "Rocket.Chat service",
	"scripts": {
		"build": "tsc -p tsconfig.json",

Additional Details:
- The diff only shows a version bump from 0.4.6 to 0.4.7
- Without seeing the full package.json (particularly the dependencies section) or changelog, we can't determine if this version change includes security fixes
- Version bumps often include security fixes, but could also be for feature additions or bug fixes
- No specific vulnerability can be identified from this limited information

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/apps/meteor/CHANGELOG.md+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/apps/meteor/CHANGELOG.md@@ -1,4 +1,45 @@ # @rocket.chat/meteor++## 6.12.1++### Patch Changes++- Bump @rocket.chat/meteor version.++- Bump @rocket.chat/meteor version.++- ([#33242](https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/pull/33242) by [@dionisio-bot](https://github.com/dionisio-bot)) Allow to use the token from `room.v` when requesting transcript instead of visitor token. Visitors may change their tokens at any time, rendering old conversations impossible to access for them (or for APIs depending on token) as the visitor token won't match the `room.v` token.++- ([#33268](https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/pull/33268) by [@dionisio-bot](https://github.com/dionisio-bot)) Security Hotfix (https://docs.rocket.chat/docs/security-fixes-and-updates)++- ([#33265](https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/pull/33265) by [@dionisio-bot](https://github.com/dionisio-bot)) fixed retention policy max age settings not being respected after upgrade++- <details><summary>Updated dependencies [3cbb9f6252]:</summary>++  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  </details> ## 6.12.0

Based on the provided CHANGELOG.md diff, I can identify the following security-related changes:

1. Vulnerability Existed: yes
Insecure Token Validation [apps/meteor/CHANGELOG.md] [Lines 8-9]
Old Code: (implied) Using visitor token for transcript requests
Fixed Code: Using token from `room.v` for transcript requests instead of visitor token
Details: Visitors could change their tokens, making old conversations inaccessible when using visitor token for validation.

2. Vulnerability Existed: yes
Unspecified Security Vulnerability [apps/meteor/CHANGELOG.md] [Lines 11-12]
Old Code: Not specified
Fixed Code: Security Hotfix (reference to security documentation)
Details: The changelog references a security hotfix but doesn't provide specific details beyond linking to security documentation.

Note: The changelog doesn't show actual code changes, only descriptions of changes. The vulnerabilities are inferred from the change descriptions. The second entry is marked as a vulnerability since it's explicitly labeled as a "Security Hotfix" in the changelog, though the exact nature isn't specified.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/ui-avatar/CHANGELOG.md+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/ui-avatar/CHANGELOG.md@@ -1,5 +1,14 @@ # @rocket.chat/ui-avatar+## 6.0.1++### Patch Changes++- <details><summary>Updated dependencies []:</summary>++  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  </details>+ ## 6.0.0 ### Patch Changes

Based on the provided diff content, which only shows changes to a CHANGELOG.md file (a version history/documentation file), I can analyze that:

    Vulnerability Existed: no
    No vulnerability [File] packages/ui-avatar/CHANGELOG.md [Lines] 1-14
    [Old Code] (Initial version without the 6.0.1 entry)
    [Fixed Code] (Added 6.0.1 version with dependency updates)

Additional details:
- This is purely a documentation/version history update showing dependency updates
- No actual code changes are visible in this diff
- The update mentions dependency updates (@rocket.chat/[email protected]) but doesn't indicate any security fixes
- Without seeing the actual code changes in the dependencies or implementation files, we cannot identify any security vulnerabilities from this changelog entry alone

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/rest-typings/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/rest-typings/package.json@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/rest-typings",-	"version": "6.12.0",+	"version": "6.12.1", 	"devDependencies": { 		"@rocket.chat/eslint-config": "workspace:~", 		"@types/jest": "~29.5.12",

Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze it for security fixes:

    Vulnerability Existed: no
    Version Update [File] packages/rest-typings/package.json [Lines 1-3]
    [Old Code]
    "version": "6.12.0",
    [Fixed Code]
    "version": "6.12.1",

Additional Details:
- This appears to be a simple version number update in the package.json file
- No actual code changes or dependency updates were made that would indicate a security fix
- The version bump could be related to security fixes elsewhere in the project, but this specific change doesn't represent a security vulnerability fix itself
- No vulnerability name can be associated with this change as it's just a version number increment

If you have access to the full changelog or commit messages for this version bump, that might provide more context about whether this was related to security fixes in other parts of the application.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/apps/meteor/client/views/marketplace/AppDetailsPage/tabs/AppReleases/AppReleasesItem.tsx+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/apps/meteor/client/views/marketplace/AppDetailsPage/tabs/AppReleases/AppReleasesItem.tsx@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ import { Accordion, Box } from '@rocket.chat/fuselage'; import { useTranslation } from '@rocket.chat/ui-contexts';+import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'; import type { ReactElement } from 'react'; import React from 'react'; import { useTimeAgo } from '../../../../../hooks/useTimeAgo';+import { purifyOptions } from '../../../lib/purifyOptions'; type IRelease = { 	version: string;@@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ 	return ( 		<Accordion.Item title={title} {...props}> 			{release.detailedChangelog?.rendered ? (-				<Box dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: release.detailedChangelog?.rendered }} color='default' />+				<Box dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(release.detailedChangelog?.rendered, purifyOptions) }} color='default' /> 			) : ( 				<Box color='default'>{t('No_release_information_provided')}</Box> 			)}

Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:

Vulnerability Existed: yes  
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) [File] apps/meteor/client/views/marketplace/AppDetailsPage/tabs/AppReleases/AppReleasesItem.tsx [Lines 36-40]  
[Old Code]  
```typescript
<Box dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: release.detailedChangelog?.rendered }} color='default' />
```  
[Fixed Code]  
```typescript
<Box dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(release.detailedChangelog?.rendered, purifyOptions) }} color='default' />
```  

Additional Details:  
- The vulnerability was fixed by adding DOMPurify to sanitize HTML content before rendering it with dangerouslySetInnerHTML
- The fix prevents potential XSS attacks by cleaning the HTML input
- The purifyOptions import suggests there are custom sanitization rules being applied
- This is a classic case where raw HTML rendering was made safe by adding proper sanitization

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/ee/apps/queue-worker/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/ee/apps/queue-worker/package.json@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/queue-worker", 	"private": true,-	"version": "0.4.6",+	"version": "0.4.7", 	"description": "Rocket.Chat service", 	"scripts": { 		"build": "tsc -p tsconfig.json",

Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Dependency Update] [ee/apps/queue-worker/package.json] [Lines: version change from 0.4.6 to 0.4.7]
[Old Code]
"version": "0.4.6",
[Fixed Code]
"version": "0.4.7",

Additional Details:
- The diff only shows a version bump in the package.json file
- Without seeing the actual dependency changes or changelog, we can't confirm if this was a security-related update
- Version bumps often include security fixes, but could also be for features or bug fixes
- No specific vulnerability can be identified from this limited information

Note: To properly assess security implications, we would need to see:
1. The changelog for version 0.4.7
2. Any updated dependencies in the package-lock.json
3. The actual code changes between these versions

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/uikit-playground/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/uikit-playground/package.json@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ {   "name": "@rocket.chat/uikit-playground",   "private": true,-  "version": "0.4.0",+  "version": "0.4.1",   "type": "module",   "scripts": {     "dev": "vite",

Based on the provided code diff, here's the analysis following the required format:

Vulnerability Existed: no
[Version Update] [packages/uikit-playground/package.json] [Lines 1-7]
[Old Code] "version": "0.4.0",
[Fixed Code] "version": "0.4.1",

Additional Details:
- The diff only shows a version number update from 0.4.0 to 0.4.1 in the package.json file
- No actual code changes or dependency updates are visible in this diff
- Version updates alone don't typically indicate security fixes unless accompanied by changelog notes (not provided here)
- Without seeing the actual changes between versions 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, we can't determine if any security vulnerabilities were fixed

Note: To properly assess security fixes, we would need to see either:
1. The full changelog/release notes for version 0.4.1, or
2. The actual code changes in the package between these versions

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/message-parser/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/message-parser/package.json@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ {   "name": "@rocket.chat/message-parser",   "description": "Rocket.Chat parser for messages",-  "version": "0.31.29",+  "version": "0.31.30",   "author": {     "name": "Rocket.Chat",     "url": "https://rocket.chat/"

Based on the provided diff, here's the analysis following the required format:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Dependency Version Update] [packages/message-parser/package.json] [Lines 1-7]
[Old Code]
{
  "name": "@rocket.chat/message-parser",
  "description": "Rocket.Chat parser for messages",
  "version": "0.31.29",
  "author": {
    "name": "Rocket.Chat",
    "url": "https://rocket.chat/"
[Fixed Code]
{
  "name": "@rocket.chat/message-parser",
  "description": "Rocket.Chat parser for messages",
  "version": "0.31.30",
  "author": {
    "name": "Rocket.Chat",
    "url": "https://rocket.chat/"

Additional Details:
- The change only shows a version bump from 0.31.29 to 0.31.30
- Without access to the changelog or release notes, we can't determine if this was a security fix
- Version bumps could include security fixes, but could also be for feature additions or bug fixes
- No direct security vulnerabilities are visible in the diff itself

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/model-typings/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/model-typings/package.json@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/model-typings",-	"version": "0.7.0",+	"version": "0.7.1", 	"private": true, 	"devDependencies": { 		"@types/node-rsa": "^1.1.3",

Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security fixes:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
    Version Update [File] packages/model-typings/package.json [Lines 1-6]
    [Old Code]
    "version": "0.7.0",
    [Fixed Code]
    "version": "0.7.1",

Additional Details:
- The diff only shows a version bump from 0.7.0 to 0.7.1 in the package.json file
- There's no direct evidence of security fixes in this specific diff
- Version bumps often include security fixes, but we can't confirm without seeing the changelog or commit messages
- No specific vulnerability name can be identified from this limited information
- The update could be related to security, bug fixes, or other improvements

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/livechat/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/livechat/package.json@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/livechat",-	"version": "1.19.3",+	"version": "1.19.4", 	"files": [ 		"/build" 	],

Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze it for security fixes:

1. First vulnerability analysis:
    Vulnerability Existed: not sure
    [Version Update Only] [packages/livechat/package.json] [Lines 2]
    [Old Code] "version": "1.19.3",
    [Fixed Code] "version": "1.19.4",

Additional Details:
- The diff shows only a version number update in package.json
- Without access to the changelog or commit messages, we cannot definitively determine if this was a security fix
- Version updates (especially patch version increments) often include security fixes, but can also include other types of fixes
- No specific vulnerability can be identified from this limited information

Note: To make a more accurate assessment, we would need:
1. The changelog for version 1.19.4
2. The actual code changes between versions
3. Any associated security advisories for this update

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/cron/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/cron/package.json@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/cron",-	"version": "0.1.6",+	"version": "0.1.7", 	"private": true, 	"devDependencies": { 		"eslint": "~8.45.0",

Based on the provided code diff, here's the analysis:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Dependency Version Update] [packages/cron/package.json] [Lines 3]
[Old Code]
"version": "0.1.6",
[Fixed Code]
"version": "0.1.7",

Additional Details:
- The diff shows only a version bump in the package.json file
- No direct security vulnerability is visible in this change
- Version bumps often include security fixes, but we can't determine that from this diff alone
- No dependencies were added/removed or had their versions changed
- Without seeing the changelog or commit messages, we can't confirm if this was a security-related update

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/ee/packages/pdf-worker/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/ee/packages/pdf-worker/package.json@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/pdf-worker",-	"version": "0.2.3",+	"version": "0.2.4", 	"private": true, 	"devDependencies": { 		"@rocket.chat/jest-presets": "workspace:~",

Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Dependency Vulnerability] [ee/packages/pdf-worker/package.json] [Lines 1-6]
[Old Code]
{
	"name": "@rocket.chat/pdf-worker",
	"version": "0.2.3",
	"private": true,
	"devDependencies": {
		"@rocket.chat/jest-presets": "workspace:~",
[Fixed Code]
{
	"name": "@rocket.chat/pdf-worker",
	"version": "0.2.4",
	"private": true,
	"devDependencies": {
		"@rocket.chat/jest-presets": "workspace:~",

Additional Details:
- The version number was updated from 0.2.3 to 0.2.4
- No direct security vulnerabilities are visible in this diff
- The version bump might indicate security fixes in the package itself, but we can't determine that from this diff alone
- The dependency "@rocket.chat/jest-presets" remains unchanged with the "workspace:~" version specifier

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/ddp-client/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/ddp-client/package.json@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/ddp-client",-	"version": "0.3.6",+	"version": "0.3.7", 	"devDependencies": { 		"@rocket.chat/jest-presets": "workspace:~", 		"@types/jest": "~29.5.12",

Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze it for security fixes:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Dependency Version Update] [packages/ddp-client/package.json] [Lines 2]
[Old Code]
"version": "0.3.6",
[Fixed Code]
"version": "0.3.7",

Additional Details:
- The diff shows only a version bump from 0.3.6 to 0.3.7
- No direct security vulnerability is visible in this change
- Version bumps might include security fixes, but we can't determine that from this diff alone
- No dependencies were added/removed or had their versions changed
- The change appears to be a routine version update rather than a specific security fix

Note: To properly assess security implications, we would need:
1. The changelog for version 0.3.7
2. Any security advisories related to the previous version
3. Changes in the actual source code files (not just package.json)

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/ee/packages/omnichannel-services/CHANGELOG.md+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/ee/packages/omnichannel-services/CHANGELOG.md@@ -1,4 +1,18 @@ # @rocket.chat/omnichannel-services++## 0.3.4++### Patch Changes++- <details><summary>Updated dependencies []:</summary>++  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  - @rocket.chat/[email protected]+  </details> ## 0.3.3

Based on the provided diff, which only shows changes to a CHANGELOG.md file (a version history/documentation file), I can analyze that:

    Vulnerability Existed: no
    No vulnerability found in changelog update [File] ee/packages/omnichannel-services/CHANGELOG.md [Lines] 1-18
    [Old Code] (Initial changelog content)
    [Fixed Code] (Added version 0.3.4 details with dependency updates)

Additional notes:
1. This appears to be a routine dependency version update in a changelog file
2. No actual code changes are shown in the diff, just documentation
3. Changelog updates alone don't indicate vulnerabilities unless they explicitly mention security fixes (which this doesn't)
4. The diff shows dependency version bumps but doesn't provide context about why they were updated

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/apps/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/apps/package.json@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { 	"name": "@rocket.chat/apps",-	"version": "0.1.6",+	"version": "0.1.7", 	"private": true, 	"devDependencies": { 		"eslint": "~8.45.0",

I'll analyze the provided code diff for security fixes following the specified format.

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Version Update] [packages/apps/package.json] [Lines 2-3]
[Old Code]
	"version": "0.1.6",
[Fixed Code]
	"version": "0.1.7",

Additional Details:
- This appears to be a simple version bump from 0.1.6 to 0.1.7
- Without seeing the changelog or commit messages, I can't determine if this was specifically for security fixes
- Version updates often include security patches, but this could also be for feature additions or bug fixes
- No direct security vulnerability is visible in the diff itself

Note: To make a more accurate assessment, I would need to see:
1. The full changelog for version 0.1.7
2. The complete diff showing all changes between versions
3. Any associated security advisories for the package

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/model-typings/src/models/IRoomsModel.ts+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/model-typings/src/models/IRoomsModel.ts@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ 	setE2eKeyId(roomId: string, e2eKeyId: string, options?: FindOptions<IRoom>): Promise<UpdateResult>; 	findOneByImportId(importId: string, options?: FindOptions<IRoom>): Promise<IRoom | null>; 	findOneByNameAndNotId(name: string, rid: string): Promise<IRoom | null>;+	findOneByIdAndType(roomId: IRoom['_id'], type: IRoom['t'], options?: FindOptions<IRoom>): Promise<IRoom | null>; 	findOneByDisplayName(displayName: string, options?: FindOptions<IRoom>): Promise<IRoom | null>; 	findOneByNameAndType( 		name: string,

Based on the provided code diff, I don't see any clear security vulnerabilities being fixed. The change appears to be adding a new method to the interface rather than fixing a security issue.

Here's the analysis following your requested format:

Vulnerability Existed: no
[No security vulnerability found] [packages/model-typings/src/models/IRoomsModel.ts] [Lines 195-196]
[Old Code]
[No code was removed, only addition made]

[Fixed Code]
+	findOneByIdAndType(roomId: IRoom['_id'], type: IRoom['t'], options?: FindOptions<IRoom>): Promise<IRoom | null>;

Additional Notes:
1. The change simply adds a new method `findOneByIdAndType` to the `IRoomsModel` interface
2. There's no modification to existing code that would indicate a security fix
3. The addition appears to be a new feature or functionality enhancement rather than a security patch
4. No CVE or known vulnerability patterns are evident in this change

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/packages/fuselage-ui-kit/package.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/packages/fuselage-ui-kit/package.json@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ {   "name": "@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit",   "private": true,-  "version": "10.0.0",+  "version": "10.0.1",   "description": "UiKit elements for Rocket.Chat Apps built under Fuselage design system",   "homepage": "https://rocketchat.github.io/Rocket.Chat.Fuselage/",   "author": {@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@     "@rocket.chat/icons": "*",     "@rocket.chat/prettier-config": "*",     "@rocket.chat/styled": "*",-    "@rocket.chat/ui-avatar": "6.0.0",-    "@rocket.chat/ui-contexts": "10.0.0",+    "@rocket.chat/ui-avatar": "6.0.1",+    "@rocket.chat/ui-contexts": "10.0.1",     "@rocket.chat/ui-kit": "0.36.1",-    "@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf": "10.0.0",+    "@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf": "10.0.1",     "@tanstack/react-query": "*",     "react": "*",     "react-dom": "*"

Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze the changes for potential security fixes. The changes appear to be version updates for dependencies, which could potentially include security fixes.

Answer Format for Each Vulnerability:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure  
   [Potential Dependency Security Updates] [packages/fuselage-ui-kit/package.json] [Lines 50-54]  
   [Old Code]  
   `"@rocket.chat/ui-avatar": "6.0.0",`  
   `"@rocket.chat/ui-contexts": "10.0.0",`  
   `"@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf": "10.0.0",`  
   [Fixed Code]  
   `"@rocket.chat/ui-avatar": "6.0.1",`  
   `"@rocket.chat/ui-contexts": "10.0.1",`  
   `"@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf": "10.0.1",`  

Additional Details:  
The diff shows version bumps for several dependencies. While we can't be certain without seeing the changelogs for these packages, version updates often include security fixes. The patch version increments (from x.x.0 to x.x.1) suggest these might be bug fixes or security patches rather than feature additions. However, without access to the specific release notes for these packages, we can't definitively confirm if these were security-related updates.

Note: The main package version itself was also updated from 10.0.0 to 10.0.1, but this appears to be a version bump to match the dependency updates rather than a security fix.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.0/Rocket.Chat-6.12.0/apps/meteor/tests/end-to-end/api/methods.ts+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/Rocket.Chat_downloads/6.12.1/Rocket.Chat-6.12.1/apps/meteor/tests/end-to-end/api/methods.ts@@ -2601,6 +2601,158 @@ 				updatePermission('bypass-time-limit-edit-and-delete', ['bot', 'app']), 				updateSetting('Message_AllowEditing_BlockEditInMinutes', 0), 			]);+		});++		describe('message deletion when user is not part of the room', () => {+			let ridTestRoom: IRoom['_id'];+			let messageIdTestRoom: IMessage['_id'];+			let testUser: TestUser<IUser>;+			let testUserCredentials: Credentials;++			before('create room, add new owner, and leave room', async () => {+				testUser = await createUser();+				testUserCredentials = await login(testUser.username, password);+				const channelName = `methods-test-channel-${Date.now()}`;++				await request+					.post(api('groups.create'))+					.set(testUserCredentials)+					.send({+						name: channelName,+					})+					.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+					.expect(200)+					.expect((res) => {+						expect(res.body).to.have.property('success', true);+						expect(res.body).to.have.nested.property('group._id');+						expect(res.body).to.have.nested.property('group.name', channelName);+						expect(res.body).to.have.nested.property('group.t', 'p');+						expect(res.body).to.have.nested.property('group.msgs', 0);+						ridTestRoom = res.body.group._id;+					});++				await request+					.post(methodCall('sendMessage'))+					.set(testUserCredentials)+					.send({+						message: JSON.stringify({+							method: 'sendMessage',+							params: [+								{+									_id: `${Date.now() + Math.random()}`,+									rid: ridTestRoom,+									msg: 'just a random test message',+								},+							],+							id: 'id',+							msg: 'method',+						}),+					})+					.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+					.expect(200)+					.expect((res) => {+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('success', true);+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message').that.is.a('string');+						const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+						expect(data).to.have.a.property('result').that.is.an('object');+						messageIdTestRoom = data.result._id;+					});++				await request+					.post(methodCall('addUsersToRoom'))+					.set(testUserCredentials)+					.send({+						message: JSON.stringify({+							method: 'addUsersToRoom',+							params: [+								{+									rid: ridTestRoom,+									users: ['rocket.cat'],+								},+							],+							id: 'id',+							msg: 'method',+						}),+					})+					.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+					.expect(200)+					.expect((res) => {+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('success', true);+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message').that.is.a('string');+					});++				await request+					.post(api('groups.addOwner'))+					.set(testUserCredentials)+					.send({+						roomId: ridTestRoom,+						userId: 'rocket.cat',+					})+					.expect((res) => {+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('success', true);+					});++				await request+					.post(api('groups.leave'))+					.set(testUserCredentials)+					.send({+						roomId: ridTestRoom,+					})+					.expect(200)+					.expect((res) => {+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('success', true);+					});+			});++			it('should not delete a message if the user is no longer member of the room', async () => {+				await request+					.post(methodCall('deleteMessage'))+					.set(testUserCredentials)+					.send({+						message: JSON.stringify({+							method: 'deleteMessage',+							params: [{ _id: messageIdTestRoom, rid: ridTestRoom }],+							id: 'id',+							msg: 'method',+						}),+					})+					.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+					.expect(200)+					.expect((res) => {+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('success', true);+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message').that.is.a('string');+						const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+						expect(data).to.have.a.property('msg', 'result');+						expect(data).to.have.a.property('id', 'id');+						expect(data.error).to.have.a.property('error', 'error-action-not-allowed');+					});+			});++			it('should not delete a message if the user was never part of the room', async () => {+				await request+					.post(methodCall('deleteMessage'))+					.set(credentials)+					.send({+						message: JSON.stringify({+							method: 'deleteMessage',+							params: [{ _id: messageIdTestRoom, rid: ridTestRoom }],+							id: 'id',+							msg: 'method',+						}),+					})+					.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+					.expect(200)+					.expect((res) => {+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('success', true);+						expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message').that.is.a('string');+						const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+						expect(data).to.have.a.property('msg', 'result');+						expect(data).to.have.a.property('id', 'id');+						expect(data.error).to.have.a.property('error', 'error-action-not-allowed');+					});+			});++			after(() => Promise.all([deleteRoom({ type: 'p', roomId: ridTestRoom }), deleteUser(testUser)])); 		}); 	});@@ -3348,6 +3500,7 @@ 				.end(done); 		}); 	});+ 	(IS_EE ? describe : describe.skip)('[@auditGetAuditions] EE', () => { 		let testUser: TestUser<IUser>; 		let testUserCredentials: Credentials;@@ -3451,4 +3604,305 @@ 				}); 		}); 	});++	describe('UpdateOTRAck', () => {+		let testUser: TestUser<IUser>;+		let testUser2: TestUser<IUser>;+		let testUserCredentials: Credentials;+		let dmTestId: IRoom['_id'];++		before(async () => {+			testUser = await createUser();+			testUser2 = await createUser();+			testUserCredentials = await login(testUser.username, password);+		});++		before('create direct conversation between both users', (done) => {+			void request+				.post(methodCall('createDirectMessage'))+				.set(testUserCredentials)+				.send({+					message: JSON.stringify({+						method: 'createDirectMessage',+						params: [testUser2.username],+						id: 'id',+						msg: 'method',+					}),+				})+				.end((_err, res) => {+					const result = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+					expect(result.result).to.be.an('object');+					expect(result.result).to.have.property('rid').that.is.an('string');++					dmTestId = result.result.rid;+					done();+				});+		});++		after(() => Promise.all([deleteRoom({ type: 'd', roomId: dmTestId }), deleteUser(testUser), deleteUser(testUser2)]));++		it('should fail if required parameters are not present', async () => {+			await request+				.post(methodCall('updateOTRAck'))+				.set(credentials)+				.send({+					message: JSON.stringify({+						method: 'updateOTRAck',+						params: [+							{+								message: {+									_id: 'czjFdkFab7H5bWxYq',+									// rid: 'test',+									msg: 'test',+									t: 'otr',+									ts: { $date: 1725447664093 },+									u: {+										_id: 'test',+										username: 'test',+										name: 'test',+									},+								},+								ack: 'test',+							},+						],+						id: '18',+						msg: 'method',+					}),+				})+				.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+				.expect(200)+				.expect((res) => {+					expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message');+					const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+					expect(data).to.have.a.property('error');+					expect(data.error).to.have.a.property('message', "Match error: Missing key 'rid'");+				});+		});++		it('should fail if required parameters have a different type', async () => {+			await request+				.post(methodCall('updateOTRAck'))+				.set(credentials)+				.send({+					message: JSON.stringify({+						method: 'updateOTRAck',+						params: [+							{+								message: {+									_id: 'czjFdkFab7H5bWxYq',+									rid: { $ne: 'test' },+									msg: 'test',+									t: 'otr',+									ts: { $date: 1725447664093 },+									u: {+										_id: 'test',+										username: 'test',+										name: 'test',+									},+								},+								ack: 'test',+							},+						],+						id: '18',+						msg: 'method',+					}),+				})+				.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+				.expect(200)+				.expect((res) => {+					expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message');+					const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+					expect(data).to.have.a.property('error');+					expect(data.error).to.have.a.property('message', 'Match error: Expected string, got object in field rid');+				});+		});++		it('should fail if "t" is not "otr"', async () => {+			await request+				.post(methodCall('updateOTRAck'))+				.set(credentials)+				.send({+					message: JSON.stringify({+						method: 'updateOTRAck',+						params: [+							{+								message: {+									_id: 'czjFdkFab7H5bWxYq',+									rid: 'test',+									msg: 'test',+									t: 'notOTR',+									ts: { $date: 1725447664093 },+									u: {+										_id: 'test',+										username: 'test',+										name: 'test',+									},+								},+								ack: 'test',+							},+						],+						id: '18',+						msg: 'method',+					}),+				})+				.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+				.expect(200)+				.expect((res) => {+					expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message');+					const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+					expect(data).to.have.a.property('error');+					expect(data.error).to.have.a.property('message', 'Invalid message type [error-invalid-message]');+				});+		});++		it('should fail if room does not exist', async () => {+			await request+				.post(methodCall('updateOTRAck'))+				.set(credentials)+				.send({+					message: JSON.stringify({+						method: 'updateOTRAck',+						params: [+							{+								message: {+									_id: 'czjFdkFab7H5bWxYq',+									rid: 'test',+									msg: 'test',+									t: 'otr',+									ts: { $date: 1725447664093 },+									u: {+										_id: 'test',+										username: 'test',+										name: 'test',+									},+								},+								ack: 'test',+							},+						],+						id: '18',+						msg: 'method',+					}),+				})+				.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+				.expect(200)+				.expect((res) => {+					expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message');+					const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+					expect(data).to.have.a.property('error');+					expect(data.error).to.have.a.property('message', 'Invalid room [error-invalid-room]');+				});+		});++		it('should fail if room is not a DM', async () => {+			await request+				.post(methodCall('updateOTRAck'))+				.set(credentials)+				.send({+					message: JSON.stringify({+						method: 'updateOTRAck',+						params: [+							{+								message: {+									_id: 'czjFdkFab7H5bWxYq',+									rid: 'GENERAL',+									msg: 'test',+									t: 'otr',+									ts: { $date: 1725447664093 },+									u: {+										_id: 'test',+										username: 'test',+										name: 'test',+									},+								},+								ack: 'test',+							},+						],+						id: '18',+						msg: 'method',+					}),+				})+				.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+				.expect(200)+				.expect((res) => {+					expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message');+					const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+					expect(data).to.have.a.property('error');+					expect(data.error).to.have.a.property('message', 'Invalid room [error-invalid-room]');+				});+		});++		it('should fail if user is not part of DM room', async () => {+			await request+				.post(methodCall('updateOTRAck'))+				.set(credentials)+				.send({+					message: JSON.stringify({+						method: 'updateOTRAck',+						params: [+							{+								message: {+									_id: 'czjFdkFab7H5bWxYq',+									rid: dmTestId,+									msg: 'test',+									t: 'otr',+									ts: { $date: 1725447664093 },+									u: {+										_id: testUser._id,+										username: testUser.username,+										name: 'test',+									},+								},+								ack: 'test',+							},+						],+						id: '18',+						msg: 'method',+					}),+				})+				.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+				.expect(200)+				.expect((res) => {+					expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message');+					const data = JSON.parse(res.body.message);+					expect(data).to.have.a.property('error');+					expect(data.error).to.have.a.property('message', 'Invalid user, not in room [error-invalid-user]');+				});+		});++		it('should pass if all parameters are present and user is part of DM room', async () => {+			await request+				.post(methodCall('updateOTRAck'))+				.set(testUserCredentials)+				.send({+					message: JSON.stringify({+						method: 'updateOTRAck',+						params: [+							{+								message: {+									_id: 'czjFdkFab7H5bWxYq',+									rid: dmTestId,+									msg: 'test',+									t: 'otr',+									ts: { $date: 1725447664093 },+									u: {+										_id: testUser._id,+										username: testUser.username,+										name: 'test',+									},+								},+								ack: 'test',+							},+						],+						id: '18',+						msg: 'method',+					}),+				})+				.expect('Content-Type', 'application/json')+				.expect(200)+				.expect((res) => {+					expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('message');+					expect(res.body).to.have.a.property('success', true);+				});+		});+	}); });

Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze the changes for potential security fixes. The diff shows two main additions: tests for message deletion when a user is not part of the room, and tests for the `updateOTRAck` method.

1. First vulnerability fix (message deletion authorization):

    Vulnerability Existed: yes
    Improper Access Control - Message Deletion [File] [Lines 2601-2760]
    [Old Code]
    (No previous test cases existed for this scenario)
    [Fixed Code]
    (Added test cases that verify users can't delete messages when they're not room members)

    This appears to be fixing an improper access control issue where users could potentially delete messages from rooms they're no longer members of or never were members of.

2. Second vulnerability fix (OTR message acknowledgment):

    Vulnerability Existed: yes
    Input Validation - OTR Message Handling [File] [Lines 3604-3909]
    [Old Code]
    (No previous test cases existed for OTR message validation)
    [Fixed Code]
    (Added comprehensive test cases that verify proper validation for OTR message acknowledgments, including parameter presence, type checking, room validation, and user membership checks)

    This appears to be fixing potential security issues in the OTR (Off-The-Record) message handling by adding proper input validation and access control checks.

The changes primarily focus on adding test cases, but these tests reveal that security fixes were implemented to properly validate:
- Room membership before allowing message deletion
- Input parameters for OTR message acknowledgments
- Room type and existence checks
- User membership verification

These changes would prevent:
- Unauthorized message deletion
- Invalid OTR message handling
- Potential injection attacks through malformed parameters
- Access control bypass attempts

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier allows stored XSS in the description and release notes of the marketplace and private apps.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and before is vulnerable to a message forgery / impersonation issue. Attackers can abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to send ephemeral messages as if they were any other user they choose.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to denial of service (DoS). Attackers who craft messages with specific characters may crash the workspace due to an issue in the message parser.

Rocket.Chat 6.12.0, 6.11.2, 6.10.5, 6.9.6, 6.8.6, 6.7.8, and earlier is vulnerable to DOM-based Cross-site Scripting (XSS). Attackers may be able to abuse the UpdateOTRAck method to forge a message that contains an XSS payload.