Shared security patch analysis results
AI Used: DEEPSEEK deepseek-chat--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-margin-box-border-radius-007.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-margin-box-border-radius-007.html@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ <link rel="author" title="Mozilla" href="http://www.mozilla.org/"> <link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-1/#shapes-from-box-values"> <link rel="match" href="reference/shape-outside-margin-box-border-radius-007-ref.html">- <meta name="flags" content=""> <meta name="assert" content="Test the boxes are wrapping around the left float shape in rtl container defined by the margin-box and border-top-right-radius value."> <style> .bfc {
Analysis of the code diff: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no No security vulnerability found [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-margin-box-border-radius-007.html] [Lines 9] Old Code: <meta name="flags" content=""> Fixed Code: (line removed) Additional Notes: - The diff shows removal of an empty meta "flags" tag, which doesn't appear to have any security implications - This appears to be a test file cleanup rather than a security fix - No known vulnerabilities are associated with this change - The modification is likely related to test suite maintenance or standards compliance rather than security
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/rust/darling_core/src/from_type_param.rs+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/rust/darling_core/src/from_type_param.rs@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@-use syn::{self, TypeParam};+use syn::TypeParam;-use Result;+use crate::Result; /// Creates an instance by parsing an individual type_param and its attributes. pub trait FromTypeParam: Sized {
Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment:
Vulnerability Existed: no
[No specific vulnerability] [third_party/rust/darling_core/src/from_type_param.rs] [Lines 1,3]
[Old Code]
-use syn::{self, TypeParam};
-use Result;
[Fixed Code]
-use syn::TypeParam;
-use crate::Result;
Additional Details:
The changes appear to be purely stylistic/refactoring changes rather than security fixes. The modifications:
1. Simplified the syn import by removing unnecessary `{self}`
2. Made the Result import more explicit by adding `crate::` prefix
Neither change addresses a security vulnerability, but rather improves code clarity and maintainability.
No security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff. The changes are related to code organization and import style rather than security fixes.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/rust/ash/src/vk.rs+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/rust/ash/src/vk.rs@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ pub use aliases::*; mod bitflags; pub use bitflags::*;+#[cfg(feature = "debug")] mod const_debugs;-pub(crate) use const_debugs::*; mod constants; pub use constants::*; mod definitions;@@ -24,14 +24,16 @@ pub use feature_extensions::*; mod features; pub use features::*;-#[doc = r" Native bindings from Vulkan headers, generated by bindgen"]+mod prelude;+pub use prelude::*;+/// Native bindings from Vulkan headers, generated by bindgen #[allow(nonstandard_style)] #[allow(deref_nullptr)] pub mod native; mod platform_types; pub use platform_types::*;-#[doc = r" Iterates through the pointer chain. Includes the item that is passed into the function."]-#[doc = r" Stops at the last `BaseOutStructure` that has a null `p_next` field."]+/// Iterates through the pointer chain. Includes the item that is passed into the function.+/// Stops at the last [`BaseOutStructure`] that has a null [`BaseOutStructure::p_next`] field. pub(crate) unsafe fn ptr_chain_iter<T>(ptr: &mut T) -> impl Iterator<Item = *mut BaseOutStructure> { let ptr: *mut BaseOutStructure = ptr as *mut T as _; (0..).scan(ptr, |p_ptr, _| {
Based on the provided diff, I don't see any clear security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be primarily documentation and code organization improvements. Here's the analysis: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no Documentation Improvement [third_party/rust/ash/src/vk.rs] [Lines 26-27] Old Code: #[doc = r" Iterates through the pointer chain. Includes the item that is passed into the function."] #[doc = r" Stops at the last `BaseOutStructure` that has a null `p_next` field."] Fixed Code: /// Iterates through the pointer chain. Includes the item that is passed into the function. /// Stops at the last [`BaseOutStructure`] that has a null [`BaseOutStructure::p_next`] field. 2. Vulnerability Existed: no Conditional Compilation Change [third_party/rust/ash/src/vk.rs] [Lines 10-11] Old Code: mod const_debugs; pub(crate) use const_debugs::*; Fixed Code: #[cfg(feature = "debug")] mod const_debugs; 3. Vulnerability Existed: no Module Addition [third_party/rust/ash/src/vk.rs] [Lines 24-25] Old Code: (not present) Fixed Code: mod prelude; pub use prelude::*; The changes are focused on: - Improving documentation syntax (from raw string doc attributes to regular doc comments) - Making const_debugs module conditional on "debug" feature - Adding a new prelude module - No security-related fixes are apparent in this diff
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.invalid.hsla-1.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.invalid.hsla-1.worker.js@@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; try { ctx.fillStyle = 'hsla(0%, 100%, 50%, 1)'; } catch (e) { } // this shouldn't throw, but it shouldn't matter here if it does ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
No specific vulnerability found
File: testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.invalid.hsla-1.worker.js
Lines: Changed variable name from offscreenCanvas to canvas
Old Code:
```javascript
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
```
Fixed Code:
```javascript
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
```
The changes appear to be purely cosmetic, renaming a variable from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` for consistency or clarity. There are no security-related changes or vulnerability fixes in this diff. The test logic remains the same, only the variable name has been updated.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/dom/system/tests/ioutils/test_ioutils_read_write_json.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/dom/system/tests/ioutils/test_ioutils_read_write_json.html@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ const PRIMITIVES = [123, true, false, "hello, world", null]; add_task(async function read_json() {- const tmpDir = await PathUtils.getTempDir();- const filename = PathUtils.join(tmpDir, "test_ioutils_read_json.tmp");+ const filename = PathUtils.join(PathUtils.tempDir, "test_ioutils_read_json.tmp"); info("Testing IOUtils.readJSON() with a serialized object..."); await IOUtils.writeUTF8(filename, JSON.stringify(OBJECT));@@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ } info("Testing IOUtils.readJSON() with a file that does not exist...");- const notExistsFilename = PathUtils.join(tmpDir, "test_ioutils_read_json_not_exists.tmp");+ const notExistsFilename = PathUtils.join(PathUtils.tempDir, "test_ioutils_read_json_not_exists.tmp"); ok(!await IOUtils.exists(notExistsFilename), `${notExistsFilename} should not exist`); await Assert.rejects( IOUtils.readJSON(notExistsFilename),@@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ ); info("Testing IOUtils.readJSON() with a file that does not contain JSON");- const invalidFilename = PathUtils.join(tmpDir, "test_ioutils_read_json_invalid.tmp");+ const invalidFilename = PathUtils.join(PathUtils.tempDir, "test_ioutils_read_json_invalid.tmp"); await IOUtils.writeUTF8(invalidFilename, ":)"); await Assert.rejects(@@ -94,8 +93,7 @@ }); add_task(async function write_json() {- const tmpDir = await PathUtils.getTempDir();- const filename = PathUtils.join(tmpDir, "test_ioutils_write_json.tmp");+ const filename = PathUtils.join(PathUtils.tempDir, "test_ioutils_write_json.tmp"); info("Testing IOUtils.writeJSON() with an object..."); await IOUtils.writeJSON(filename, OBJECT);@@ -143,8 +141,7 @@ }); add_task(async function test_append_json() {- const tmpDir = await PathUtils.getTempDir();- const filename = PathUtils.join(tmpDir, "test_ioutils_append_json.tmp");+ const filename = PathUtils.join(PathUtils.tempDir, "test_ioutils_append_json.tmp"); await IOUtils.writeJSON(filename, OBJECT);
Analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any clear security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be primarily code style/optimization changes where `PathUtils.getTempDir()` is replaced with direct access to `PathUtils.tempDir`. Here's the analysis: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no No security vulnerability found [File] dom/system/tests/ioutils/test_ioutils_read_write_json.html [Lines] Various [Old Code] const tmpDir = await PathUtils.getTempDir(); const filename = PathUtils.join(tmpDir, "..."); [Fixed Code] const filename = PathUtils.join(PathUtils.tempDir, "..."); The changes simply: 1. Remove redundant temporary directory fetching (since PathUtils.tempDir is already available) 2. Make the code more concise by removing intermediate variables 3. Don't affect security as both methods ultimately access the same temporary directory There are no changes to: - Input validation - File permission handling - JSON parsing security - Error handling - Any other security-sensitive operations The changes appear to be purely stylistic/optimizational rather than security-related.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.path.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.path.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50)@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ ctx.putImageData(imgdata, 0, 0); ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; ctx.fill();-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255", 2); t.done(); });
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming for better code clarity/consistency. Here's the analysis: Vulnerability Existed: no [No security vulnerability found] [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.path.worker.js] [Lines 13-23] [Old Code: using variable name 'offscreenCanvas'] [Fixed Code: using variable name 'canvas'] The changes are: 1. Renamed variable 'offscreenCanvas' to 'canvas' 2. Updated the reference in _assertPixelApprox call accordingly These changes don't represent any security fixes but rather code style/consistency improvements. No security-related patterns (like input validation, sanitization, or security-sensitive operations) were modified in this diff.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/browser/themes/shared/urlbarView.inc.css+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/browser/themes/shared/urlbarView.inc.css@@ -1,13 +1,6 @@-%if 0 /* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */-%endif--%filter substitution-%define urlbarViewPadding 4px-%define urlbarViewFaviconWidth 16px-%define urlbarViewIconMarginEnd (var(--urlbar-icon-padding) + var(--identity-box-margin-inline)) %include ../shared/urlbar/dynamicResults.inc.css@@ -20,6 +13,9 @@ --urlbarView-action-slide-in-distance: 200px; --urlbarView-item-inline-padding: var(--urlbar-icon-padding);++ --urlbarView-favicon-width: 16px;+ --urlbarView-icon-margin-end: calc(var(--urlbar-icon-padding) + var(--identity-box-margin-inline)); } :root:-moz-lwtheme {@@ -69,7 +65,7 @@ } .urlbarView-results {- padding-block: @urlbarViewPadding@;+ padding-block: 4px; white-space: nowrap; }@@ -118,7 +114,7 @@ padding-block-start: 18px; /* Compensating for the 16px bottom margin on the tip elements. */ padding-block-end: calc(18px - 16px);- padding-inline-end: calc(@urlbarViewIconMarginEnd@);+ padding-inline-end: var(--urlbarView-icon-margin-end); } .urlbarView-row-inner,@@ -146,7 +142,7 @@ /* We prioritize icons + title + action over the url, so they can grow freely, but the url should never disappear when it's visible */ flex-shrink: 0;- max-width: calc(70% - 2 * (@urlbarViewFaviconWidth@ + (6px + 2px)));+ max-width: calc(70% - 2 * (var(--urlbarView-favicon-width) + (6px + 2px))); } /* Wrap the url to a second line when the window is narrow. Do not wrap when the@@ -159,21 +155,23 @@ max-width: 100% !important; flex-basis: 100%; }- .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[has-url] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-url {+ .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[has-url] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-url,+ .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top > .urlbarView-url { margin-top: 2px; } /* urlbarView-url is forced to be LTR for RTL locales, so set the padding based on the browser's directionality. */ .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[has-url] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-url:-moz-locale-dir(ltr) {- padding-left: calc(var(--urlbarView-item-inline-padding) + var(--identity-box-margin-inline) + @urlbarViewFaviconWidth@);+ padding-left: calc(var(--urlbarView-item-inline-padding) + var(--identity-box-margin-inline) + var(--urlbarView-favicon-width)); } .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[has-url] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-url:-moz-locale-dir(rtl) {- padding-right: calc(var(--urlbarView-item-inline-padding) + var(--identity-box-margin-inline) + @urlbarViewFaviconWidth@);+ padding-right: calc(var(--urlbarView-item-inline-padding) + var(--identity-box-margin-inline) + var(--urlbarView-favicon-width)); } /* Note: switchtab entries show the url only in override mode, remotetab and sponsored ones only when selected or :hover. */ .urlbarView[actionoverride] .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[has-url] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title-separator, .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[has-url]:not([type$=tab], [sponsored]) > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title-separator, .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[has-url]:is([type=remotetab], [sponsored]):is(:hover, [selected]) > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title-separator,+ .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top > .urlbarView-row-body-top-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title-separator, .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[type=tabtosearch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title-separator { display: none; }@@ -182,7 +180,14 @@ } .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[type=tabtosearch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-no-wrap > .urlbarView-action { flex-basis: 100%;- margin-inline-start: calc(var(--urlbarView-item-inline-padding) + var(--identity-box-margin-inline) + @urlbarViewFaviconWidth@);+ margin-inline-start: calc(var(--urlbarView-item-inline-padding) + var(--identity-box-margin-inline) + var(--urlbarView-favicon-width));+ }++ .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top {+ flex-wrap: wrap;+ }+ .urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top > .urlbarView-row-body-top-no-wrap {+ flex-basis: 100%; } }@@ -194,12 +199,14 @@ } .urlbarView-row:not([type=tip], [type=dynamic]) > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title[overflow],+.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top > .urlbarView-row-body-top-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title[overflow], .urlbarView-tags[overflow], .urlbarView-url[overflow] { mask-image: linear-gradient(to left, transparent, black 2em); } .urlbarView-row:not([type=tip], [type=dynamic]) > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title[overflow]:not([isurl]):-moz-locale-dir(rtl),+.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top > .urlbarView-row-body-top-no-wrap > .urlbarView-title[overflow]:-moz-locale-dir(rtl), .urlbarView-tags[overflow]:-moz-locale-dir(rtl) { mask-image: linear-gradient(to right, transparent, black 2em); }@@ -231,9 +238,9 @@ /* Favicon */ .urlbarView-favicon {- width: @urlbarViewFaviconWidth@;- height: @urlbarViewFaviconWidth@;- margin-inline-end: calc(@urlbarViewIconMarginEnd@);+ width: var(--urlbarView-favicon-width);+ height: var(--urlbarView-favicon-width);+ margin-inline-end: var(--urlbarView-icon-margin-end); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: contain; object-fit: contain;@@ -539,7 +546,7 @@ displayed width, favicon and title will collapse as different row, the style will be broken. To avoid it, we specify the max displayable width for title explicitly. */- flex-basis: calc(100% - @urlbarViewFaviconWidth@ - @urlbarViewIconMarginEnd@);+ flex-basis: calc(100% - var(--urlbarView-favicon-width) - var(--urlbarView-icon-margin-end)); /* Move the title away from the action a little. This does not affect the height of the row. */ margin-top: -0.3em;@@ -547,7 +554,7 @@ .urlbarView-row[firefox-suggest-sponsored] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-no-wrap > .urlbarView-action { flex-basis: 100%;- margin-inline-start: calc(@urlbarViewFaviconWidth@ + @urlbarViewIconMarginEnd@);+ margin-inline-start: calc(var(--urlbarView-favicon-width) + var(--urlbarView-icon-margin-end)); font-size: 0.73em; /* This value + the bottom padding control the space between the bottom edge of the favicon and the bottom edge of the row. The bottom padding is 1px,@@ -666,6 +673,67 @@ border-radius: 4px; }+/* Best match */++.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner {+ align-items: center;+ justify-content: start;+}++.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner,+.urlbarView-results[wrap] > .urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner {+ flex-wrap: nowrap;+}++.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-favicon {+ width: 52px;+ height: 52px;+ flex-basis: 52px;+ flex-shrink: 0;+ flex-grow: 0;+ border-radius: 2px;+}++.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body {+ flex-grow: 1;+ flex-shrink: 1;+ min-width: 0;+}++.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top {+ display: flex;+ flex-wrap: nowrap;+ flex-direction: row;+ align-items: center;+ justify-content: start;+}++.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top > .urlbarView-row-body-top-no-wrap {+ display: flex;+ flex-wrap: nowrap;+ flex-direction: row;+ align-items: center;+ justify-content: start;+ flex-shrink: 0;+ min-width: 0;+}++.urlbarView-results:not([wrap]) > .urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-top > .urlbarView-row-body-top-no-wrap {+ /* Limit the title (which is inside .urlbarView-row-body-top-no-wrap) to 70%+ of the width so the URL is never completely hidden. */+ max-width: 70%;+}++.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-bottom {+ font-size: 0.73em;+ opacity: 0.6;+}++.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch][selected] > .urlbarView-row-inner > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-bottom,+.urlbarView-row[type=bestmatch] > .urlbarView-row-inner[selected] > .urlbarView-row-body > .urlbarView-row-body-bottom {+ opacity: 1;+}+ /* Search one-offs */ #urlbar .search-one-offs:not([hidden]) {
After analyzing the provided CSS diff, I don't find any clear security vulnerabilities. The changes appear to be primarily stylistic and structural improvements to the Firefox URL bar view. Here's my analysis: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no No security vulnerability found The changes involve: - Removing substitution filters and replacing them with CSS variables - Adding new styling for "bestmatch" type rows - General CSS property adjustments The main changes are: - Removal of %filter substitution and %define macros in favor of CSS variables (--urlbarView-favicon-width, --urlbarView-icon-margin-end) - Addition of new styling for "bestmatch" type URL bar results - Various CSS property adjustments for better layout and responsiveness These appear to be frontend improvements rather than security fixes. The changes improve maintainability by using CSS variables instead of preprocessing substitutions, and add new UI features for the "bestmatch" result type. No known vulnerability patterns (XSS, injection, etc.) are present in these CSS changes. CSS files typically don't contain security vulnerabilities unless they enable UI redressing attacks, and these changes don't appear to do so.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/q-unit-case-insensitivity-001.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/q-unit-case-insensitivity-001.html@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ <link rel="match" href="../reference/ref-filled-green-100px-square.xht"> <meta content="This test checks that 'Q' unit is case-insensitive." name="assert">- <meta name="flags" content=""> <style> div#test-overlapping-green
Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no [Meta tag removal] [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/q-unit-case-insensitivity-001.html] [Lines around 10] [Old Code: `<meta name="flags" content="">`] [Fixed Code: (removed line)] Additional details: - The change simply removes an empty meta tag that wasn't serving any purpose - This appears to be a cleanup change rather than a security fix - No known vulnerability is associated with this change - The modification doesn't introduce any security concerns There are no other changes in the provided diff to analyze. The rest of the file remains unchanged.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/taskcluster/ci/build-fat-aar/kind.yml+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/taskcluster/ci/build-fat-aar/kind.yml@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ MOZ_ANDROID_FAT_AAR_ARCHITECTURES: "armeabi-v7a,arm64-v8a,x86,x86_64" artifacts: - name: public/build/maven- path: /builds/worker/workspace/obj-build/gradle/build/mobile/android/geckoview/maven/+ path: /builds/worker/workspace/obj-build/gradle/maven/ type: directory - name: public/build path: /builds/worker/artifacts/@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ shippable: true enable-full-crashsymbols: true disable-push-apk: true+ maven_packages:+ - geckoview shipping-phase: build shipping-product: fennec index:@@ -129,6 +131,9 @@ shippable: true enable-full-crashsymbols: true disable-push-apk: true+ maven_packages:+ - geckoview+ - geckoview-exoplayer2 shipping-phase: build shipping-product: fennec index:
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
Path Disclosure Vulnerability [taskcluster/ci/build-fat-aar/kind.yml] [Lines 32-35]
[Old Code]
- name: public/build/maven
path: /builds/worker/workspace/obj-build/gradle/build/mobile/android/geckoview/maven/
type: directory
[Fixed Code]
- name: public/build/maven
path: /builds/worker/workspace/obj-build/gradle/maven/
type: directory
Additional Details: The path was simplified, which might reduce information disclosure about internal directory structure, but it's unclear if this was a security fix or just a refactoring.
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
Missing Dependency Specification [taskcluster/ci/build-fat-aar/kind.yml] [Lines 95-96, 131-133]
[Old Code]
disable-push-apk: true
[Fixed Code]
disable-push-apk: true
maven_packages:
- geckoview
- geckoview-exoplayer2
Additional Details: The addition of explicit maven package specifications improves build reproducibility and might prevent potential dependency confusion attacks, but it's unclear if this was motivated by security concerns.
Note: The changes appear to be primarily build system improvements rather than direct security fixes. The modifications include path simplification and explicit package declarations, which could have security implications but don't clearly address any specific known vulnerabilities.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/js-self-profiling/resources/profile-utils.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/js-self-profiling/resources/profile-utils.js@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ (function(global) { const TEST_SAMPLE_INTERVAL = 10;+ const ENSURE_SAMPLE_SPIN_WAIT_MS = 500; function forceSample() { // Spin for |TEST_SAMPLE_INTERVAL + 500|ms to ensure that a sample occurs@@ -8,7 +9,10 @@ // // More reliable sampling will be handled in a future testdriver RFC // (https://github.com/web-platform-tests/rfcs/pull/81).- for (const deadline = performance.now() + TEST_SAMPLE_INTERVAL + 500; performance.now() < deadline;);+ for (const deadline = performance.now() + TEST_SAMPLE_INTERVAL ++ ENSURE_SAMPLE_SPIN_WAIT_MS;+ performance.now() < deadline;)+ ; } // Creates a new profile that captures the execution of when the given@@ -82,6 +86,24 @@ return trace.resources.includes(expectedResource); }+ // Returns true if a trace contains a sample matching the given specification.+ // We define a "match" as follows: a sample A matches an expectation E if (and+ // only if) for each field of E, A has the same value.+ function containsSample(trace, expectedSample) {+ return trace.samples.find(sample => {+ return sampleMatches(sample, expectedSample);+ }) !== undefined;+ }++ // Compares each set field of `expected` against the given frame `actual`.+ function sampleMatches(actual, expected) {+ return (expected.timestamp === undefined ||+ expected.timestamp === actual.timestamp) &&+ (expected.stackId === undefined ||+ expected.stackId === actual.stackId) &&+ (expected.marker === undefined || expected.marker === actual.marker);+ }+ // Compares each set field of `expected` against the given frame `actual`. function frameMatches(actual, expected) { return (expected.name === undefined || expected.name === actual.name) &&@@ -116,6 +138,7 @@ containsFrame, containsSubstack, containsResource,+ containsSample, // Cross-frame sampling forceSampleFrame,
Let me analyze the code diff for security fixes:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
No specific vulnerability was fixed in this diff. The changes appear to be functional improvements and code organization rather than security fixes.
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
Potential Timing Attack [File] testing/web-platform/tests/js-self-profiling/resources/profile-utils.js [Lines] 1-13
[Old Code]
const TEST_SAMPLE_INTERVAL = 10;
function forceSample() {
for (const deadline = performance.now() + TEST_SAMPLE_INTERVAL + 500; performance.now() < deadline;);
}
[Fixed Code]
const TEST_SAMPLE_INTERVAL = 10;
const ENSURE_SAMPLE_SPIN_WAIT_MS = 500;
function forceSample() {
for (const deadline = performance.now() + TEST_SAMPLE_INTERVAL +
ENSURE_SAMPLE_SPIN_WAIT_MS;
performance.now() < deadline;)
;
}
Note: While this change improves code clarity by extracting the magic number 500 into a constant, I'm not sure if this was addressing any potential timing-related security issue. The change appears to be primarily for code maintainability.
3. Vulnerability Existed: no
The remaining changes (adding containsSample and sampleMatches functions) appear to be new feature additions rather than security fixes. These functions provide new capabilities for sample comparison but don't appear to address any security vulnerabilities.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/gfx/layers/ipc/CompositorBridgeParent.cpp+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/gfx/layers/ipc/CompositorBridgeParent.cpp@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ #include "mozilla/layers/WebRenderBridgeParent.h" #include "mozilla/layers/AsyncImagePipelineManager.h" #include "mozilla/webrender/WebRenderAPI.h"-#include "mozilla/webgpu/WebGPUParent.h" #include "mozilla/webrender/RenderThread.h" #include "mozilla/media/MediaSystemResourceService.h" // for MediaSystemResourceService #include "mozilla/mozalloc.h" // for operator new, etc@@ -520,6 +519,11 @@ return IPC_OK(); }+mozilla::ipc::IPCResult CompositorBridgeParent::RecvNotifyMemoryPressure() {+ NotifyMemoryPressure();+ return IPC_OK();+}+ mozilla::ipc::IPCResult CompositorBridgeParent::RecvFlushRenderingAsync( const wr::RenderReasons& aReasons) { if (mWrBridge) {@@ -1281,28 +1285,6 @@ } } parent->Release(); // IPDL reference- return true;-}--webgpu::PWebGPUParent* CompositorBridgeParent::AllocPWebGPUParent() {- // This should only ever get called in the GPU process.- MOZ_ASSERT(XRE_IsGPUProcess());- // Shouldn't re-initialize- MOZ_ASSERT(!mWebGPUBridge);- // We should only ever get this if WebGPU is enabled in this compositor.- MOZ_RELEASE_ASSERT(mOptions.UseWebGPU());-- mWebGPUBridge = new webgpu::WebGPUParent();- mWebGPUBridge.get()->AddRef(); // IPDL reference- return mWebGPUBridge;-}--bool CompositorBridgeParent::DeallocPWebGPUParent(- webgpu::PWebGPUParent* aActor) {- webgpu::WebGPUParent* parent = static_cast<webgpu::WebGPUParent*>(aActor);- MOZ_ASSERT(mWebGPUBridge == parent);- parent->Release(); // IPDL reference- mWebGPUBridge = nullptr; return true; }
Here is the analysis of the provided code diff for security fixes:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
WebGPU Parent Removal [gfx/layers/ipc/CompositorBridgeParent.cpp] [Lines 1281-1306]
Old Code:
```cpp
webgpu::PWebGPUParent* CompositorBridgeParent::AllocPWebGPUParent() {
// This should only ever get called in the GPU process.
MOZ_ASSERT(XRE_IsGPUProcess());
// Shouldn't re-initialize
MOZ_ASSERT(!mWebGPUBridge);
// We should only ever get this if WebGPU is enabled in this compositor.
MOZ_RELEASE_ASSERT(mOptions.UseWebGPU());
mWebGPUBridge = new webgpu::WebGPUParent();
mWebGPUBridge.get()->AddRef(); // IPDL reference
return mWebGPUBridge;
}
bool CompositorBridgeParent::DeallocPWebGPUParent(
webgpu::PWebGPUParent* aActor) {
webgpu::WebGPUParent* parent = static_cast<webgpu::WebGPUParent*>(aActor);
MOZ_ASSERT(mWebGPUBridge == parent);
parent->Release(); // IPDL reference
mWebGPUBridge = nullptr;
return true;
}
```
Fixed Code:
(Entire WebGPU-related code removed)
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
Memory Pressure Notification Added [gfx/layers/ipc/CompositorBridgeParent.cpp] [Lines 520-523]
Old Code:
(No code existed for handling memory pressure notifications)
Fixed Code:
```cpp
mozilla::ipc::IPCResult CompositorBridgeParent::RecvNotifyMemoryPressure() {
NotifyMemoryPressure();
return IPC_OK();
}
```
Note: While the removal of WebGPU-related code and addition of memory pressure handling could be security-related changes, the diff doesn't provide enough context to confirm if these were specifically addressing security vulnerabilities. The WebGPU removal might be related to security hardening (removing potentially vulnerable components), and the memory pressure notification could help prevent memory-related security issues, but we can't be certain without more context.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/rust/libc/src/unix/linux_like/linux/arch/mips/mod.rs+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/rust/libc/src/unix/linux_like/linux/arch/mips/mod.rs@@ -131,3 +131,6 @@ pub const BOTHER: ::speed_t = 0o010000; pub const IBSHIFT: ::tcflag_t = 16;++pub const BLKSSZGET: ::c_int = 0x20001268;+pub const BLKPBSZGET: ::c_int = 0x2000127B;
Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment: 1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential Missing Constants] [third_party/rust/libc/src/unix/linux_like/linux/arch/mips/mod.rs] [Lines 131-134] [Old Code] pub const BOTHER: ::speed_t = 0o010000; pub const IBSHIFT: ::tcflag_t = 16; [Fixed Code] pub const BOTHER: ::speed_t = 0o010000; pub const IBSHIFT: ::tcflag_t = 16; pub const BLKSSZGET: ::c_int = 0x20001268; pub const BLKPBSZGET: ::c_int = 0x2000127B; Additional Details: - The diff shows the addition of two constants (BLKSSZGET and BLKPBSZGET) related to block device operations - These appear to be ioctl commands for getting sector size and physical block size - While not clearly a security fix, these constants might be needed for proper device handling - Without more context about why these were added, it's unclear if this addresses a specific vulnerability - The change appears to be more about completeness/functionality than security
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/drawing-rectangles-to-the-canvas/2d.strokeRect.zero.1.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/drawing-rectangles-to-the-canvas/2d.strokeRect.zero.1.worker.js@@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.strokeStyle = '#f00'; ctx.lineWidth = 250; ctx.strokeRect(50, 25, 0, 0);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0"); t.done(); });
After analyzing the provided code diff, here's my assessment:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
Variable Renaming [File] [Lines 13-19]
Old Code:
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
...
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0");
Fixed Code:
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
...
_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0");
Additional Details:
The changes appear to be purely cosmetic, renaming the variable from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` for consistency or style reasons. There are no security-related changes in this diff, no vulnerability fixes, and no changes to the actual functionality of the code. The modification is simply a variable name change that doesn't affect the security posture of the code.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.stroke.cap.2.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.stroke.cap.2.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ ctx.moveTo(25, -25); ctx.lineTo(75, -25); ctx.stroke();-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 1,25, 0,255,0,255, "1,25", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 98,25, 0,255,0,255, "98,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 1,25, 0,255,0,255, "1,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 98,25, 0,255,0,255, "98,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely cosmetic/refactoring changes where a variable name was changed from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` for consistency or readability purposes.
Here's the structured response:
Vulnerability Existed: no
[No security vulnerability found] [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.stroke.cap.2.worker.js] [Lines 13-27]
[Old Code: var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d'); ... _assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, ...)]
[Fixed Code: var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ... _assertPixel(canvas, ...)]
The changes don't affect any security-related functionality, input validation, or output handling. It's simply a variable renaming throughout the file with no impact on the security posture of the code.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.get.clamp.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.get.clamp.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = 'rgb(-100, -200, -300)'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);
Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security analysis:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.get.clamp.html] [Lines 17-18]
Old Code:
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
Fixed Code:
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
The changes appear to be purely a variable name change from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`. This doesn't represent a security fix but rather a code style/consistency improvement. There are no security implications in this change as it doesn't affect the functionality or introduce/remove any security-relevant features. The context ('2d') and the canvas creation remain identical in both versions.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.object.string.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.object.string.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); var imgdata = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, 10, 10); imgdata.data[0] = 100;
Analysis of the provided code diff:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
No specific vulnerability found [File] testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.object.string.html [Lines] 17-18
Old Code:
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
Fixed Code:
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
Additional Notes:
- The change appears to be a simple variable renaming from "offscreenCanvas" to "canvas"
- No security-related changes or vulnerability fixes are evident in this diff
- The modification seems to be for code consistency/readability rather than security
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/path-objects/2d.path.rect.winding.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/path-objects/2d.path.rect.winding.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ ctx.rect(0, 25, 100, -25); ctx.rect(100, 25, -100, 25); ctx.fill();-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 25,12, 0,255,0,255, "25,12", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 75,12, 0,255,0,255, "75,12", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 25,37, 0,255,0,255, "25,37", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 75,37, 0,255,0,255, "75,37", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 25,12, 0,255,0,255, "25,12", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 75,12, 0,255,0,255, "75,12", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 25,37, 0,255,0,255, "25,37", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 75,37, 0,255,0,255, "75,37", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming and don't affect security aspects. Here's the analysis:
Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found
File: testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/path-objects/2d.path.rect.winding.worker.js
Lines: 13-14, 25-28
Old Code:
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 25,12, 0,255,0,255, "25,12", "0,255,0,255");
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 75,12, 0,255,0,255, "75,12", "0,255,0,255");
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 25,37, 0,255,0,255, "25,37", "0,255,0,255");
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 75,37, 0,255,0,255, "75,37", "0,255,0,255");
Fixed Code:
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(canvas, 25,12, 0,255,0,255, "25,12", "0,255,0,255");
_assertPixel(canvas, 75,12, 0,255,0,255, "75,12", "0,255,0,255");
_assertPixel(canvas, 25,37, 0,255,0,255, "25,37", "0,255,0,255");
_assertPixel(canvas, 75,37, 0,255,0,255, "75,37", "0,255,0,255");
The changes simply rename the variable 'offscreenCanvas' to 'canvas' throughout the file, which doesn't impact security. The functionality remains identical.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.invalid.name-4.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.invalid.name-4.html@@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; try { ctx.fillStyle = '"red"'; } catch (e) { } // this shouldn't throw, but it shouldn't matter here if it does ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
Based on the provided diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely cosmetic/refactoring changes (variable renaming) and don't affect security. Here's the analysis following your format:
Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.invalid.name-4.html] [17-24]
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
...
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
...
_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
The changes are:
1. Renaming variable `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`
2. Updating the variable name in the `_assertPixel` call
3. No security-related changes were made
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/dom/media/webrtc/third_party_build/gn-configs/x64_False_arm64_win.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/dom/media/webrtc/third_party_build/gn-configs/x64_False_arm64_win.json@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -228,7 +227,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -399,7 +397,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -570,7 +567,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -746,7 +742,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -918,7 +913,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1086,7 +1080,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1251,7 +1244,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1425,7 +1417,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1600,7 +1591,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1774,7 +1764,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1949,7 +1938,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2123,7 +2111,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2299,7 +2286,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2462,7 +2448,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2638,7 +2623,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2816,7 +2800,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2979,7 +2962,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3150,7 +3132,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3327,7 +3308,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3498,7 +3478,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3675,7 +3654,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3852,7 +3830,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4030,7 +4007,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4193,7 +4169,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4367,7 +4342,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4545,7 +4519,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4718,7 +4691,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4906,7 +4878,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5090,7 +5061,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5274,7 +5244,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5441,7 +5410,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5608,7 +5576,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5780,7 +5747,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5952,7 +5918,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6130,7 +6095,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6305,7 +6269,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6474,7 +6437,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6647,7 +6609,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6821,7 +6782,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6991,7 +6951,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7160,7 +7119,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7329,7 +7287,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7496,7 +7453,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7666,7 +7622,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7841,7 +7796,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8018,7 +7972,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8184,7 +8137,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8356,7 +8308,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8525,7 +8476,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8695,7 +8645,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8864,7 +8813,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9034,7 +8982,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9213,7 +9160,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9384,7 +9330,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9563,7 +9508,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9736,7 +9680,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9904,7 +9847,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10075,7 +10017,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10242,7 +10183,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10411,7 +10351,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10574,7 +10513,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10755,7 +10693,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10934,7 +10871,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11113,7 +11049,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11285,7 +11220,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11464,7 +11398,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11627,7 +11560,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11805,7 +11737,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11986,7 +11917,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12163,7 +12093,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12328,7 +12257,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12502,7 +12430,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12680,7 +12607,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12871,7 +12797,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13072,7 +12997,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13247,7 +13171,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13413,7 +13336,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13582,7 +13504,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13748,7 +13669,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13911,7 +13831,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14076,7 +13995,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14243,7 +14161,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14416,7 +14333,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14581,7 +14497,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14744,7 +14659,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14922,7 +14836,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15085,7 +14998,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15248,7 +15160,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15415,7 +15326,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15587,7 +15497,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15758,7 +15667,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15933,7 +15841,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16108,7 +16015,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16271,7 +16177,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16434,7 +16339,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16605,7 +16509,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16769,7 +16672,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16949,7 +16851,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17199,7 +17100,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17406,7 +17306,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17573,7 +17472,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17755,7 +17653,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17931,7 +17828,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18154,7 +18050,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18371,7 +18266,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18553,7 +18447,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18741,7 +18634,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18923,7 +18815,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19142,7 +19033,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19322,7 +19212,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19493,7 +19382,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19687,7 +19575,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19863,7 +19750,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20027,7 +19913,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20191,7 +20076,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20400,7 +20284,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20628,7 +20511,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20789,7 +20671,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20961,7 +20842,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21138,7 +21018,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21313,7 +21192,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21476,7 +21354,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21654,7 +21531,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21828,7 +21704,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "--target=arm64-windows",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro",
After analyzing the provided code diff, I can identify one consistent change made across multiple locations in the file:
1. Removal of ANSI escape codes flag:
Vulnerability Existed: yes
ANSI Escape Code Injection x64_False_arm64_win.json [Multiple lines throughout file]
Old Code: "-fansi-escape-codes"
Fixed Code: (removed)
The removal of the `-fansi-escape-codes` compiler flag appears to be a security fix. ANSI escape codes can potentially be used for:
1. Terminal injection attacks
2. Hiding malicious commands in log output
3. Creating misleading output in terminal sessions
By removing this flag, the build system will no longer process ANSI escape codes, which helps prevent potential terminal/console-based injection attacks. This is a defense-in-depth measure to prevent malicious actors from exploiting terminal emulator vulnerabilities or creating misleading output.
The change was made consistently across all compiler flag configurations in the file, indicating a systematic removal of this potentially dangerous feature.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-pseudo/spelling-error-003-manual.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-pseudo/spelling-error-003-manual.html@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ <link rel="help" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/css-pseudo-4/#highlight-selectors"> <link rel="help" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/css-pseudo-4/#highlight-styling">- <meta content="" name="flags"> <style> textarea
Analysis of the provided code diff: 1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential Information Leak] [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-pseudo/spelling-error-003-manual.html] [Line 10] [Old Code: <meta content="" name="flags">] [Fixed Code: (removed)] Additional Notes: - The diff shows removal of an empty meta tag with name="flags". While this doesn't appear to be a direct security vulnerability, empty or unused meta tags could potentially leak information about the application's framework or configuration. - Without more context about what this "flags" meta tag was intended for, we can't definitively say this was a security fix, but it could be part of general code cleanup or removing potentially sensitive metadata. - No specific vulnerability name clearly applies here, but removing unused metadata is generally good security practice.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.