--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/element/drawing-rectangles-to-the-canvas/2d.clearRect.nonfinite.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/element/drawing-rectangles-to-the-canvas/2d.clearRect.nonfinite.html@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);- ctx.clearRect(Infinity, 0, 100, 50); ctx.clearRect(-Infinity, 0, 100, 50); ctx.clearRect(NaN, 0, 100, 50);@@ -45,7 +44,6 @@ ctx.clearRect(0, Infinity, Infinity, Infinity); ctx.clearRect(0, Infinity, 100, Infinity); ctx.clearRect(0, 0, Infinity, Infinity);- _assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");

Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
   [Potential Input Validation Issue] [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/element/drawing-rectangles-to-the-canvas/2d.clearRect.nonfinite.html] [Lines 21-44]
   [Old Code]
   ctx.clearRect(Infinity, 0, 100, 50);
   ctx.clearRect(-Infinity, 0, 100, 50);
   ctx.clearRect(NaN, 0, 100, 50);
   [... other clearRect calls with non-finite values ...]
   
   [Fixed Code]
   [These lines were removed]

Additional Details:
- The diff shows removal of test cases that were testing canvas clearRect() with non-finite values (Infinity, -Infinity, NaN)
- While not a direct security vulnerability, this could be related to fixing potential input validation issues where non-finite values might cause unexpected behavior
- The change appears to be removing test cases rather than fixing production code, so the security impact is unclear
- No known CVE or specific vulnerability name is associated with this change

Note: Since this is a test file modification rather than production code, it's difficult to assess actual security impact. The change might be related to test cleanup or reflecting changes in how the canvas API handles non-finite values.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas/initial.reset.same.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas/initial.reset.same.html@@ -17,15 +17,15 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');-offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+canvas.width = 100; ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 50, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 20,20, 255,0,0,255, "20,20", "255,0,0,255");-offscreenCanvas.width = 100;-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 20,20, 0,0,0,0, "20,20", "0,0,0,0");+_assertPixel(canvas, 20,20, 255,0,0,255, "20,20", "255,0,0,255");+canvas.width = 100;+_assertPixel(canvas, 20,20, 0,0,0,0, "20,20", "0,0,0,0"); t.done(); });

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming and don't affect security. Here's the analysis following your format:

Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas/initial.reset.same.html] [Lines 17-27]
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
offscreenCanvas.width = 100;
ctx.fillStyle = '#f00';
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 50, 50);
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 20,20, 255,0,0,255, "20,20", "255,0,0,255");
offscreenCanvas.width = 100;
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 20,20, 0,0,0,0, "20,20", "0,0,0,0");

[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
canvas.width = 100;
ctx.fillStyle = '#f00';
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 50, 50);
_assertPixel(canvas, 20,20, 255,0,0,255, "20,20", "255,0,0,255");
canvas.width = 100;
_assertPixel(canvas, 20,20, 0,0,0,0, "20,20", "0,0,0,0");

The changes only involve renaming the variable from 'offscreenCanvas' to 'canvas' and don't introduce or fix any security-related issues. The functionality remains identical.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/devtools/client/debugger/src/reducers/source-actors.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/devtools/client/debugger/src/reducers/source-actors.js@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@  * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this  * file, You can obtain one at <http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/>. */-import { asSettled } from "../utils/async-value"; import {   createInitial,   insertResources,@@ -10,10 +9,6 @@   removeResources,   hasResource,   getResource,-  getMappedResource,-  makeWeakQuery,-  makeIdQuery,-  makeReduceAllQuery, } from "../utils/resource"; import { asyncActionAsValue } from "../actions/utils/middleware/promise";@@ -112,94 +107,3 @@   return updateResources(state, [{ id: sourceId, breakableLines: value }]); }--export function resourceAsSourceActor({-  breakpointPositions,-  breakableLines,-  ...sourceActor-}) {-  return sourceActor;-}--export function hasSourceActor(state, id) {-  return hasResource(state.sourceActors, id);-}--export function getSourceActor(state, id) {-  return getMappedResource(state.sourceActors, id, resourceAsSourceActor);-}--/**- * Get all of the source actors for a set of IDs. Caches based on the identity- * of "ids" when possible.- */-const querySourceActorsById = makeIdQuery(resourceAsSourceActor);--export function getSourceActors(state, ids) {-  return querySourceActorsById(state.sourceActors, ids);-}--const querySourcesByThreadID = makeReduceAllQuery(-  resourceAsSourceActor,-  actors => {-    return actors.reduce((acc, actor) => {-      acc[actor.thread] = acc[actor.thread] || [];-      acc[actor.thread].push(actor);-      return acc;-    }, {});-  }-);-export function getSourceActorsForThread(state, ids) {-  const sourcesByThread = querySourcesByThreadID(state.sourceActors);--  let sources = [];-  for (const id of Array.isArray(ids) ? ids : [ids]) {-    sources = sources.concat(sourcesByThread[id] || []);-  }-  return sources;-}--const queryThreadsBySourceObject = makeReduceAllQuery(-  actor => ({ thread: actor.thread, source: actor.source }),-  actors =>-    actors.reduce((acc, { source, thread }) => {-      let sourceThreads = acc[source];-      if (!sourceThreads) {-        sourceThreads = [];-        acc[source] = sourceThreads;-      }--      sourceThreads.push(thread);-      return acc;-    }, {})-);--export function getAllThreadsBySource(state) {-  return queryThreadsBySourceObject(state.sourceActors);-}--export function getSourceActorBreakableLines(state, id) {-  const { breakableLines } = getResource(state.sourceActors, id);--  return asSettled(breakableLines);-}--export function getSourceActorBreakpointColumns(state, id, line) {-  const { breakpointPositions } = getResource(state.sourceActors, id);--  return asSettled(breakpointPositions.get(line) || null);-}--export const getBreakableLinesForSourceActors = makeWeakQuery({-  filter: (state, ids) => ids,-  map: ({ breakableLines }) => breakableLines,-  reduce: items =>-    Array.from(-      items.reduce((acc, item) => {-        if (item && item.state === "fulfilled") {-          acc = acc.concat(item.value);-        }-        return acc;-      }, [])-    ),-});

Let me analyze the code diff for potential security vulnerabilities:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Information Exposure] [devtools/client/debugger/src/reducers/source-actors.js] [Lines 112-94 (removed functions)]
[Old Code]
export function resourceAsSourceActor({
  breakpointPositions,
  breakableLines,
  ...sourceActor
}) {
  return sourceActor;
}
... (multiple removed functions)
[Fixed Code]
(These functions were completely removed)

Additional Details: The removal of these functions suggests potential security improvements in handling source actor information, possibly related to preventing information exposure of debugger internals. However, without more context about why these were removed, I can't be certain if this was specifically for security reasons.

2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Resource Management Issue] [devtools/client/debugger/src/reducers/source-actors.js] [Lines 2,10 (removed imports)]
[Old Code]
import { asSettled } from "../utils/async-value";
...
import {
  ...
  getMappedResource,
  makeWeakQuery,
  makeIdQuery,
  makeReduceAllQuery,
} from "../utils/resource";
[Fixed Code]
(These imports were removed)

Additional Details: The removal of these utility functions might indicate improvements in resource handling or memory management, but again, without more context about the motivation for these changes, I can't definitively identify a specific vulnerability being fixed.

Note: The diff shows significant simplification of the source-actors reducer by removing many utility functions and queries. While this could potentially improve security by reducing the attack surface, I can't identify any specific, named vulnerabilities that were fixed based solely on this code removal. The changes appear more architectural than directly security-related.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.clip.destination-in.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.clip.destination-in.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0';@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ ctx.clip(); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 50, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 25,25, 0,255,0,255, "25,25", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 75,25, 0,255,0,255, "75,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 25,25, 0,255,0,255, "25,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 75,25, 0,255,0,255, "75,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming (from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`) and corresponding updates to the assertions. Here's the analysis following your requested format:

Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 17-18, 28-29]
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 25,25, 0,255,0,255, "25,25", "0,255,0,255");
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 75,25, 0,255,0,255, "75,25", "0,255,0,255");

[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(canvas, 25,25, 0,255,0,255, "25,25", "0,255,0,255");
_assertPixel(canvas, 75,25, 0,255,0,255, "75,25", "0,255,0,255");

The changes are purely cosmetic/refactoring in nature and don't appear to address any security issues. The functionality remains exactly the same, only the variable name has been changed for consistency or clarity.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/rust/pin-project-internal/src/pinned_drop.rs+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/rust/pin-project-internal/src/pinned_drop.rs@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ use proc_macro2::TokenStream; use quote::{quote, ToTokens};-use syn::{spanned::Spanned, visit_mut::VisitMut, *};+use syn::{+    parse_quote, spanned::Spanned, visit_mut::VisitMut, Error, FnArg, GenericArgument, Ident,+    ImplItem, ImplItemMethod, ItemImpl, Pat, Path, PathArguments, Result, ReturnType, Token, Type,+    TypePath, TypeReference,+}; use crate::utils::{parse_as_empty, prepend_underscore_to_self, ReplaceReceiver, SliceExt};

Analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any clear security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be primarily about improving code organization and imports rather than addressing security issues. Here's my analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
    Import Reorganization [third_party/rust/pin-project-internal/src/pinned_drop.rs] [Lines 1-6]
    [Old Code]
    use proc_macro2::TokenStream;
    use quote::{quote, ToTokens};
    use syn::{spanned::Spanned, visit_mut::VisitMut, *};
    [Fixed Code]
    use proc_macro2::TokenStream;
    use quote::{quote, ToTokens};
    use syn::{
        parse_quote, spanned::Spanned, visit_mut::VisitMut, Error, FnArg, GenericArgument, Ident,
        ImplItem, ImplItemMethod, ItemImpl, Pat, Path, PathArguments, Result, ReturnType, Token, Type,
        TypePath, TypeReference,
    };

The main change is replacing a wildcard import (`*`) with explicit imports from the `syn` crate. This is generally considered better practice as it makes dependencies more explicit and can prevent naming conflicts, but it doesn't represent a security fix. There are no visible changes to actual functionality or security-sensitive code.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.rgb-clamp-5.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.rgb-clamp-5.html@@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillStyle = 'rgb(-10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, -10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });

Analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be primarily variable renaming and test case maintenance. Here's the analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   Variable Renaming [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.rgb-clamp-5.html] [Lines 17-18]
   Old Code:
   var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
   Fixed Code:
   var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');

2. Vulnerability Existed: no
   Test Assertion Update [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.rgb-clamp-5.html] [Line 23]
   Old Code:
   _assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
   Fixed Code:
   _assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");

The changes are:
1. Renaming the variable from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` for consistency or brevity
2. Updating the assertion call to use the new variable name
3. The test case itself (with the extremely large RGB values) remains unchanged as it appears to be testing how the browser handles extreme numeric inputs

No security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff. The changes are purely cosmetic/refactoring in nature.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.gradient.conic.invalid.inputs.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.gradient.conic.invalid.inputs.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); assert_throws_js(TypeError, function() { ctx.createConicGradient(Infinity, 0, 1); }); assert_throws_js(TypeError, function() { ctx.createConicGradient(-Infinity, 0, 1); });

Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   Variable Renaming [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.gradient.conic.invalid.inputs.html] [Lines 17-18]
   Old Code:
   var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
   
   Fixed Code:
   var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');

Additional Details:
- The change appears to be purely a variable name change from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`
- There are no security implications to this change as it doesn't affect functionality or introduce/remove any security checks
- The rest of the file remains unchanged in terms of security-related behavior
- The test continues to check for invalid inputs (Infinity, -Infinity, NaN) which is good practice but wasn't modified in this diff

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/tools/lint/tox/tox_requirements.txt+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/tools/lint/tox/tox_requirements.txt@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@-pluggy==0.6.0 --hash=sha256:e160a7fcf25762bb60efc7e171d4497ff1d8d2d75a3d0df7a21b76821ecbf5c5+pluggy==0.13.1 --hash=sha256:966c145cd83c96502c3c3868f50408687b38434af77734af1e9ca461a4081d2d+importlib-metadata==0.23 --hash=sha256:d5f18a79777f3aa179c145737780282e27b508fc8fd688cb17c7a813e8bd39af+more-itertools==7.2.0 --hash=sha256:92b8c4b06dac4f0611c0729b2f2ede52b2e1bac1ab48f089c7ddc12e26bb60c4+zipp==0.6.0 --hash=sha256:f06903e9f1f43b12d371004b4ac7b06ab39a44adc747266928ae6debfa7b3335 py==1.5.4 --hash=sha256:e31fb2767eb657cbde86c454f02e99cb846d3cd9d61b318525140214fdc0e98e tox==2.7.0 --hash=sha256:0f37ea637ead4a5bbae91531b0bf8fd327c7152e20255e5960ee180598228d21 virtualenv==15.1.0 --hash=sha256:39d88b533b422825d644087a21e78c45cf5af0ef7a99a1fc9fbb7b481e5c85b0

Here's the analysis of the provided code diff for security fixes:

1. Vulnerability Existed: yes  
   Dependency Version Upgrade [File] tools/lint/tox/tox_requirements.txt [Lines] 1  
   [Old Code] pluggy==0.6.0 --hash=sha256:e160a7fcf25762bb60efc7e171d4497ff1d8d2d75a3d0df7a21b76821ecbf5c5  
   [Fixed Code] pluggy==0.13.1 --hash=sha256:966c145cd83c96502c3c3868f50408687b38434af77734af1e9ca461a4081d2d  
   Additional Details: The pluggy dependency was upgraded from 0.6.0 to 0.13.1, which likely includes security fixes from multiple versions.

2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure  
   New Dependency Added [File] tools/lint/tox/tox_requirements.txt [Lines] 2  
   [Old Code] (none)  
   [Fixed Code] importlib-metadata==0.23 --hash=sha256:d5f18a79777f3aa179c145737780282e27b508fc8fd688cb17c7a813e8bd39af  
   Additional Details: A new dependency was added, but it's unclear if this was for security reasons or functionality.

3. Vulnerability Existed: not sure  
   New Dependency Added [File] tools/lint/tox/tox_requirements.txt [Lines] 3  
   [Old Code] (none)  
   [Fixed Code] more-itertools==7.2.0 --hash=sha256:92b8c4b06dac4f0611c0729b2f2ede52b2e1bac1ab48f089c7ddc12e26bb60c4  
   Additional Details: A new dependency was added, but it's unclear if this was for security reasons or functionality.

4. Vulnerability Existed: not sure  
   New Dependency Added [File] tools/lint/tox/tox_requirements.txt [Lines] 4  
   [Old Code] (none)  
   [Fixed Code] zipp==0.6.0 --hash=sha256:f06903e9f1f43b12d371004b4ac7b06ab39a44adc747266928ae6debfa7b3335  
   Additional Details: A new dependency was added, but it's unclear if this was for security reasons or functionality.

Note: While the version upgrade of pluggy clearly indicates a security improvement, the addition of new dependencies might be for functionality rather than security. Without more context from the changelog or commit messages, we can't be certain about the security implications of the new dependencies.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/jpeg-xl/lib/jxl/enc_modular.h+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/jpeg-xl/lib/jxl/enc_modular.h@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@                              Image3F* JXL_RESTRICT color,                              const std::vector<ImageF>& extra_channels,                              PassesEncoderState* JXL_RESTRICT enc_state,-                             ThreadPool* pool, AuxOut* aux_out, bool do_color);+                             const JxlCmsInterface& cms, ThreadPool* pool,+                             AuxOut* aux_out, bool do_color);   // Encodes global info (tree + histograms) in the `writer`.   Status EncodeGlobalInfo(BitWriter* writer, AuxOut* aux_out);   // Encodes a specific modular image (identified by `stream`) in the `writer`,

Let me analyze the provided code diff for security vulnerabilities.

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Parameter Injection/Insufficient Input Validation] [third_party/jpeg-xl/lib/jxl/enc_modular.h] [Lines 30-34]
[Old Code]
                             PassesEncoderState* JXL_RESTRICT enc_state,
                             ThreadPool* pool, AuxOut* aux_out, bool do_color);
[Fixed Code]
                             const JxlCmsInterface& cms, ThreadPool* pool,
                             AuxOut* aux_out, bool do_color);

Analysis:
1. The change adds a new parameter `const JxlCmsInterface& cms` to the function signature.
2. While this doesn't appear to fix a specific known vulnerability, the addition of a color management system interface could be related to:
   - Preventing potential color space manipulation attacks
   - Adding validation for color transformations
   - Fixing potential memory safety issues in color handling
3. Without more context about the JxlCmsInterface implementation, I can't be certain if this fixes a specific vulnerability.

Note: The change appears to be more of a feature enhancement or API modification rather than a clear security fix, but there might be underlying security implications we can't see from just this diff.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/browsers/servodriver.py+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/browsers/servodriver.py@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@     with os.fdopen(hosts_fd, "w") as f:         f.write(make_hosts_file(config, "127.0.0.1"))     return hosts_path+ class ServoWebDriverBrowser(Browser):     init_timeout = 300  # Large timeout for cases where we're booting an Android emulator

Based on the provided diff content, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No specific vulnerability found [File] [Lines 75-75]
   [Old Code]
   with os.fdopen(hosts_fd, "w") as f:
       f.write(make_hosts_file(config, "127.0.0.1"))
   return hosts_path
   
   [Fixed Code]
   with os.fdopen(hosts_fd, "w") as f:
       f.write(make_hosts_file(config, "127.0.0.1"))
   return hosts_path


The diff shows only a whitespace change (adding a newline) and no actual code changes that would indicate a security fix. The functionality remains exactly the same, just with improved formatting. Therefore, I don't see any security vulnerability being addressed in this change.

Note: The diff appears to be showing the same code on both sides, suggesting either a display issue or that the actual security-relevant changes might be elsewhere in the file. However, based on what's shown here, there's no security vulnerability being fixed.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/devtools/client/performance-new/test/browser/browser_interaction-between-interfaces.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/devtools/client/performance-new/test/browser/browser_interaction-between-interfaces.js@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@           CPU Utilization           Audio Callback Tracing           IPC Messages+          Process CPU Utilization         `       );     }

After analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment:

Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 305-306]
[Old Code]
          CPU Utilization
          Audio Callback Tracing
          IPC Messages
[Fixed Code]
          CPU Utilization
          Audio Callback Tracing
          IPC Messages
          Process CPU Utilization

Additional Details:
1. The change appears to be a simple addition of "Process CPU Utilization" to a list of performance monitoring features.
2. There are no security-related changes in this diff - no authentication, authorization, input validation, or other security-sensitive modifications.
3. The change is purely functional, adding a new monitoring capability to the performance tools.

No security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff. The modification is a feature addition rather than a security fix.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/drawing-images-to-the-canvas/2d.drawImage.canvas.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/drawing-images-to-the-canvas/2d.drawImage.canvas.html@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); var offscreenCanvas2 = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); var ctx2 = offscreenCanvas2.getContext('2d');@@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ ctx2.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.drawImage(offscreenCanvas2, 0, 0);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 0,0, 0,255,0,255, "0,0", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 99,0, 0,255,0,255, "99,0", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 0,49, 0,255,0,255, "0,49", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 99,49, 0,255,0,255, "99,49", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 0,0, 0,255,0,255, "0,0", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 99,0, 0,255,0,255, "99,0", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 0,49, 0,255,0,255, "0,49", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 99,49, 0,255,0,255, "99,49", "0,255,0,255", 2); t.done(); });

Based on the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming and don't address any security issues.

Answer Format for Each Vulnerability:
    Vulnerability Existed: no
    No security vulnerabilities found in this diff. The changes are purely variable renaming from 'offscreenCanvas' to 'canvas' and updating corresponding assertions.

The changes are:
1. Renamed variable 'offscreenCanvas' to 'canvas'
2. Updated assertion calls to use the new variable name
3. No security-related changes were made

This appears to be a code cleanup/refactoring change rather than a security fix.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/tools/yaml/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas.yaml+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/tools/yaml/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas.yaml@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@   testing:   - 2d.canvas   code: |-    @assert ctx.canvas === offscreenCanvas;+    @assert ctx.canvas === canvas;     t.done(); - name: 2d.canvas.readonly@@ -45,12 +45,12 @@   testing:   - context.2d.extraargs   code: |-    @assert offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d', false, {}, [], 1, "2") !== null;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d', 123) !== null;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d', "test") !== null;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d', undefined) !== null;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d', null) !== null;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d', Symbol.hasInstance) !== null;+    @assert canvas.getContext('2d', false, {}, [], 1, "2") !== null;+    @assert canvas.getContext('2d', 123) !== null;+    @assert canvas.getContext('2d', "test") !== null;+    @assert canvas.getContext('2d', undefined) !== null;+    @assert canvas.getContext('2d', null) !== null;+    @assert canvas.getContext('2d', Symbol.hasInstance) !== null;     t.done(); - name: 2d.getcontext.unique@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@   testing:   - context.unique   code: |-    var ctx2 = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+    var ctx2 = canvas.getContext('2d');     ctx.fillStyle = '#f00';     ctx2.fillStyle = '#0f0';     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@     ctx.fillStyle = '#f00';     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 50, 50);     @assert pixel 20,20 == 255,0,0,255;-    offscreenCanvas.width = 50;+    canvas.width = 50;     @assert pixel 20,20 == 0,0,0,0;     t.done();@@ -162,11 +162,11 @@   testing:   - initial.reset   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.fillStyle = '#f00';     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 50, 50);     @assert pixel 20,20 == 255,0,0,255;-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     @assert pixel 20,20 == 0,0,0,0;     t.done();@@ -175,9 +175,9 @@   testing:   - initial.reset   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.rect(0, 0, 100, 50);-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.fillStyle = '#f00';     ctx.fill();     @assert pixel 20,20 == 0,0,0,0;@@ -188,10 +188,10 @@   testing:   - initial.reset   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.rect(0, 0, 1, 1);     ctx.clip();-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0';     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);     @assert pixel 20,20 == 0,255,0,255;@@ -202,9 +202,9 @@   testing:   - initial.reset   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.scale(0.1, 0.1);-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0';     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);     @assert pixel 20,20 == 0,255,0,255;@@ -215,11 +215,11 @@   testing:   - initial.reset   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 50;+    canvas.width = 50;     var g = ctx.createLinearGradient(0, 0, 100, 0);     g.addColorStop(0, '#0f0');     g.addColorStop(1, '#0f0');-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.fillStyle = '#f00';     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);     ctx.fillStyle = g;@@ -232,11 +232,11 @@   testing:   - initial.reset   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 30;+    canvas.width = 30;     ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0';     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 30, 50);-    var p = ctx.createPattern(offscreenCanvas, 'repeat-x');-    offscreenCanvas.width = 100;+    var p = ctx.createPattern(canvas, 'repeat-x');+    canvas.width = 100;     ctx.fillStyle = '#f00';     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);     ctx.fillStyle = p;@@ -250,10 +250,10 @@   - size.width   - size.height   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 0;-    offscreenCanvas.height = 0;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === 0;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === 0;+    canvas.width = 0;+    canvas.height = 0;+    @assert canvas.width === 0;+    @assert canvas.height === 0;     t.done(); - name: size.attributes.idl@@ -264,22 +264,22 @@   webidl:   - es-unsigned-long   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = "100";-    offscreenCanvas.height = "100";-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === 100;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === 100;-    offscreenCanvas.width = "+1.5e2";-    offscreenCanvas.height = "0x96";-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === 150;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === 150;-    offscreenCanvas.width = 301.999;-    offscreenCanvas.height = 301.001;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === 301;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === 301;-    @assert throws TypeError offscreenCanvas.width = "400x";-    @assert throws TypeError offscreenCanvas.height = "foo";-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === 301;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === 301;+    canvas.width = "100";+    canvas.height = "100";+    @assert canvas.width === 100;+    @assert canvas.height === 100;+    canvas.width = "+1.5e2";+    canvas.height = "0x96";+    @assert canvas.width === 150;+    @assert canvas.height === 150;+    canvas.width = 301.999;+    canvas.height = 301.001;+    @assert canvas.width === 301;+    @assert canvas.height === 301;+    @assert throws TypeError canvas.width = "400x";+    @assert throws TypeError canvas.height = "foo";+    @assert canvas.width === 301;+    @assert canvas.height === 301;     t.done(); - name: size.attributes.default@@ -288,8 +288,8 @@   - size.default   - size.missing   code: |-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === 100;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === 50;+    @assert canvas.width === 100;+    @assert canvas.height === 50;     t.done(); - name: size.attributes.reflect.setidl@@ -297,10 +297,10 @@   testing:   - size.reflect   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 120;-    offscreenCanvas.height = 60;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === 120;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === 60;+    canvas.width = 120;+    canvas.height = 60;+    @assert canvas.width === 120;+    @assert canvas.height === 60;     t.done(); - name: size.attributes.reflect.setidlzero@@ -308,10 +308,10 @@   testing:   - size.reflect   code: |-    offscreenCanvas.width = 0;-    offscreenCanvas.height = 0;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === 0;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === 0;+    canvas.width = 0;+    canvas.height = 0;+    @assert canvas.width === 0;+    @assert canvas.height === 0;     t.done(); - name: size.large@@ -322,10 +322,10 @@     limit on the size.   code: |     var n = 2147483647; // 2^31 - 1, which should be supported by any sensible definition of "long"-    offscreenCanvas.width = n;-    offscreenCanvas.height = n;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.width === n;-    @assert offscreenCanvas.height === n;+    canvas.width = n;+    canvas.height = n;+    @assert canvas.width === n;+    @assert canvas.height === n;     t.done(); - name: 2d.text.setFont.mathFont

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't find any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be primarily about renaming `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` throughout the test file. This seems to be a refactoring or standardization change rather than a security fix.

Here's the analysis following your requested format:

Vulnerability Existed: no
[No security vulnerability found] [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/tools/yaml/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas.yaml] [Throughout file]
[Old Code: Various instances of 'offscreenCanvas']
[Fixed Code: Replaced with 'canvas']

The changes are consistent throughout the file and don't appear to address any security issues. They seem to be standardizing the variable name used in the tests.

If you'd like me to analyze any specific part of the diff in more detail, please let me know.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/the-canvas-state/2d.state.saverestore.transformation.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/the-canvas-state/2d.state.saverestore.transformation.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ ctx.restore(); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillRect(-200, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't find any security vulnerabilities. The changes appear to be purely cosmetic/refactoring changes where variable names were updated for consistency. Here's the analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
    Variable Renaming [File] [Lines 17-18, 27]
    [Old Code]
    var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
    var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
    _assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
    
    [Fixed Code]
    var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
    var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
    _assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");

The changes only involve renaming the variable from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` and updating the references to it. There are no security implications in this change.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.componentTransfer.discrete.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.componentTransfer.discrete.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); // From https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/filters.html#feComponentTransferElement function getTransformedValue(C, V) {@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@     let outputColor = getColor(color, [tableValuesR, tableValuesG, tableValuesB]);     ctx.fillStyle = `rgb(${color[0]}, ${color[1]}, ${color[2]})`;     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 10, 10);-    _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 5, 5, outputColor[0],outputColor[1],outputColor[2],255, "5,5", `${outputColor[0]},${outputColor[1]},${outputColor[2]}`, 2);+    _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 5, 5, outputColor[0],outputColor[1],outputColor[2],255, "5,5", `${outputColor[0]},${outputColor[1]},${outputColor[2]}`, 2); } t.done();

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming (from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`) and updating the corresponding references in the code. Here's the analysis following the requested format:

    Vulnerability Existed: no
    No security vulnerability found
    File: testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.componentTransfer.discrete.worker.js
    Lines: 13-14, 55
    Old Code: var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d'); _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 5, 5, ...);
    Fixed Code: var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 5, 5, ...);

The changes are purely cosmetic/refactoring in nature and don't address any security issues. The functionality remains exactly the same, just with a different variable name.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/rust/idna/src/lib.rs+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/rust/idna/src/lib.rs@@ -34,13 +34,11 @@ #[macro_use] extern crate matches;-extern crate unicode_bidi;-extern crate unicode_normalization; pub mod punycode; mod uts46;-pub use uts46::{Config, Errors};+pub use crate::uts46::{Config, Errors, Idna}; /// The [domain to ASCII](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-domain-to-ascii) algorithm. ///

Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No specific vulnerability found in this diff
   File: third_party/rust/idna/src/lib.rs
   Lines: 34-38
   Old Code: 
   ```
   extern crate unicode_bidi;
   extern crate unicode_normalization;
   ```
   Fixed Code: 
   ```
   (removed)
   ```

2. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No specific vulnerability found in this diff
   File: third_party/rust/idna/src/lib.rs
   Lines: 40
   Old Code: 
   ```
   pub use uts46::{Config, Errors};
   ```
   Fixed Code: 
   ```
   pub use crate::uts46::{Config, Errors, Idna};
   ```

The changes appear to be:
1. Removal of explicit extern crate declarations (which is a Rust 2018 edition change)
2. Addition of `Idna` to the public exports and using the crate-relative path syntax

Neither change appears to be security-related. The modifications seem to be code style/import organization updates rather than security fixes. No specific vulnerabilities are addressed in this diff.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/toolkit/xre/metrics.yaml+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/toolkit/xre/metrics.yaml@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@     description: >       The outcome after the app detected that it was running from DMG and       should offer to install and relaunch itself.+    metadata: &metadata+      tags:+        - "Toolkit :: Startup and Profile System"     bugs:       - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1743328     data_reviews:

Based on the provided code diff, I don't see any security-related fixes. The changes appear to be metadata additions for documentation/tracking purposes.

Answer:

    Vulnerability Existed: no
    No security vulnerability found [toolkit/xre/metrics.yaml] [Lines 23-26]
    [Old code didn't have the metadata section]
    [Fixed code adds metadata section with tags]

The change simply adds metadata tags for better organization/tracking of the metrics configuration, which doesn't appear to be security-related. The modification is purely administrative/documentation in nature.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/path-objects/2d.path.arc.end.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/path-objects/2d.path.arc.end.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ ctx.arc(-100, 0, 25, -Math.PI/2, Math.PI/2, true); ctx.lineTo(100, 25); ctx.stroke();-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });

Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No specific vulnerability found [File] testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/path-objects/2d.path.arc.end.html [Lines] 17-29
   [Old Code]
   var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
   ...
   _assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
   
   [Fixed Code]
   var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
   ...
   _assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");

The changes appear to be purely variable name changes (from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`) with no security implications. The functionality remains identical, just using a different variable name. No security vulnerabilities were fixed in this change.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/devtools/client/debugger/src/workers/parser/getScopes/visitor.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/devtools/client/debugger/src/workers/parser/getScopes/visitor.js@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@  * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this  * file, You can obtain one at <http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/>. */-import isEmpty from "lodash/isEmpty"; import * as t from "@babel/types"; import getFunctionName from "../utils/getFunctionName";@@ -38,7 +37,7 @@ export function parseSourceScopes(sourceId) {   const ast = getAst(sourceId);-  if (isEmpty(ast)) {+  if (!ast || Object.keys(ast).length == 0) {     return null;   }

Based on the provided code diff, here's the analysis:

Vulnerability Existed: no
[Removed Unnecessary Dependency] [devtools/client/debugger/src/workers/parser/getScopes/visitor.js] [Lines 2, 38]
[Old Code]
import isEmpty from "lodash/isEmpty";
...
if (isEmpty(ast)) {
[Fixed Code]
...
if (!ast || Object.keys(ast).length == 0) {

Additional Details:
1. The change removes a dependency on lodash's isEmpty function and replaces it with native JavaScript checks.
2. This is not a security fix but rather a code optimization/cleanup.
3. The functionality remains the same but with less external dependencies.
4. No security vulnerability is being addressed here - just an improvement in code maintainability.

Note: There are no security vulnerabilities identified in this diff. The change is purely about code quality and dependency management.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/text/2d.text.draw.space.collapse.other.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/text/2d.text.draw.space.collapse.other.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); var f = new FontFace("CanvasTest", "url('/fonts/CanvasTest.ttf')"); let fonts = (self.fonts ? self.fonts : document.fonts);@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@     ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);     ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0';     ctx.fillText('E \x09\x0a\x0c\x0d  \x09\x0a\x0c\x0dEE', -100, 37.5);-    _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 25,25, 0,255,0,255, "25,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);-    _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 75,25, 0,255,0,255, "75,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);+    _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 25,25, 0,255,0,255, "25,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);+    _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 75,25, 0,255,0,255, "75,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);   }).then(t_pass, t_fail); });

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't find any security vulnerabilities. The changes appear to be purely cosmetic/refactoring changes where a variable name was changed from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`. The functionality remains the same.

Here's the structured response:

    Vulnerability Existed: no
    No security vulnerability found [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/text/2d.text.draw.space.collapse.other.html] [17-30]
    [Old Code: var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); ... _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, ...)]
    [Fixed Code: var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); ... _assertPixelApprox(canvas, ...)]

The changes are:
1. Variable renaming from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`
2. Corresponding updates to the variable name in the assertions
3. No changes to the actual security-sensitive operations or data handling

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.