--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-text-decor/parsing/text-emphasis-position-computed.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-text-decor/parsing/text-emphasis-position-computed.html@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ // Computed value: specified keyword(s) test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'over'); test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'under');-test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'over right');+test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'over right', 'over'); test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'over left');-test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'under right');+test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'under right', 'under'); test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'under left'); </script>

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be related to test case adjustments rather than security fixes. Here's the analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
    No security vulnerability [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-text-decor/parsing/text-emphasis-position-computed.html] [Lines 8,10]
    Old Code:
    test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'over right');
    test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'under right');
    
    Fixed Code:
    test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'over right', 'over');
    test_computed_value('text-emphasis-position', 'under right', 'under');

The changes simply add expected values to the test_computed_value function calls, which is a testing refinement rather than a security fix. The modifications are consistent with test case improvements where the expected computed values are now explicitly specified.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/rust/unicode-normalization/README.md+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/rust/unicode-normalization/README.md@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ fn main() {     assert_eq!(compose('A','\u{30a}'), Some('Å'));-    +     let s = "ÅΩ";     let c = s.nfc().collect::<String>();     assert_eq!(c, "ÅΩ");@@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ ```toml [dependencies]-unicode-normalization = "0.1.3"+unicode-normalization = "0.1.7" ```

Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
    Dependency Version Update [File] [Lines 28-28]
    [Old Code]
    unicode-normalization = "0.1.3"
    [Fixed Code]
    unicode-normalization = "0.1.7"

Additional Details:
- The diff shows a version update of the unicode-normalization dependency from 0.1.3 to 0.1.7
- While version updates often include security fixes, the diff doesn't provide any changelog or vulnerability information
- Without knowing the specific changes between these versions, we can't definitively say what security issues were addressed
- The rest of the changes are whitespace/formatting changes that don't appear security-related

Note: To make a more definitive assessment, we would need to examine:
1. The changelog between versions 0.1.3 and 0.1.7 of unicode-normalization
2. Any security advisories related to these versions
3. The actual code changes in the library itself

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/js/public/GCAPI.h+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/js/public/GCAPI.h@@ -586,6 +586,7 @@   D(XPCONNECT_SHUTDOWN, 53)                                            \   D(DOCSHELL, 54)                                                      \   D(HTML_PARSER, 55)                                                   \+  D(DOM_TESTUTILS, 56)                                                 \                                                                        \   /* Reasons reserved for embeddings. */                               \   D(RESERVED1, FIRST_RESERVED_REASON)                                  \@@ -712,7 +713,7 @@ extern JS_PUBLIC_API void StartIncrementalGC(JSContext* cx,                                              JS::GCOptions options,                                              GCReason reason,-                                             int64_t millis = 0);+                                             const js::SliceBudget& budget); /**  * Perform a slice of an ongoing incremental collection. When this function@@ -723,7 +724,7 @@  *       shorter than the requested interval.  */ extern JS_PUBLIC_API void IncrementalGCSlice(JSContext* cx, GCReason reason,-                                             int64_t millis = 0);+                                             const js::SliceBudget& budget); /**  * Return whether an incremental GC has work to do on the foreground thread and@@ -988,6 +989,7 @@  */ class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoAssertNoGC : public AutoRequireNoGC { #ifdef MOZ_DIAGNOSTIC_ASSERT_ENABLED+ protected:   JSContext* cx_;  public:@@ -1062,13 +1064,19 @@ class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoCheckCannotGC : public AutoAssertNoGC {  public:   explicit AutoCheckCannotGC(JSContext* cx = nullptr) : AutoAssertNoGC(cx) {}+#  ifdef MOZ_DIAGNOSTIC_ASSERT_ENABLED+  AutoCheckCannotGC(const AutoCheckCannotGC& other)+      : AutoCheckCannotGC(other.cx_) {}+#  else+  AutoCheckCannotGC(const AutoCheckCannotGC& other) : AutoCheckCannotGC() {}+#  endif+#else+class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoCheckCannotGC : public AutoRequireNoGC{+  public :+      explicit AutoCheckCannotGC(JSContext* cx = nullptr){} AutoCheckCannotGC(+          const AutoCheckCannotGC& other) : AutoCheckCannotGC(){}+#endif } JS_HAZ_GC_INVALIDATED;-#else-class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoCheckCannotGC : public AutoRequireNoGC {- public:-  explicit AutoCheckCannotGC(JSContext* cx = nullptr) {}-} JS_HAZ_GC_INVALIDATED;-#endif extern JS_PUBLIC_API void SetLowMemoryState(JSContext* cx, bool newState);

I'll analyze the code diff and provide the security findings following the specified format.

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Memory Safety Issue] [js/public/GCAPI.h] [Lines 712-724]
[Old Code]
extern JS_PUBLIC_API void StartIncrementalGC(JSContext* cx,
                                             JS::GCOptions options,
                                             GCReason reason,
                                             int64_t millis = 0);
[Fixed Code]
extern JS_PUBLIC_API void StartIncrementalGC(JSContext* cx,
                                             JS::GCOptions options,
                                             GCReason reason,
                                             const js::SliceBudget& budget);

Additional Details: The change from using a simple millisecond timeout to a more structured SliceBudget object suggests a potential improvement in memory safety or resource management, but without more context, I can't be certain if this was fixing a specific vulnerability.

2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Memory Safety Issue] [js/public/GCAPI.h] [Lines 988-1064]
[Old Code]
class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoAssertNoGC : public AutoRequireNoGC {
#ifdef MOZ_DIAGNOSTIC_ASSERT_ENABLED
  JSContext* cx_;
[Fixed Code]
class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoAssertNoGC : public AutoRequireNoGC {
#ifdef MOZ_DIAGNOSTIC_ASSERT_ENABLED
 protected:
  JSContext* cx_;

Additional Details: The change makes the cx_ member protected instead of private, which might relate to inheritance safety, but it's unclear if this was fixing a specific vulnerability.

3. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Inheritance Safety Issue] [js/public/GCAPI.h] [Lines 1062-1072]
[Old Code]
class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoCheckCannotGC : public AutoAssertNoGC {
 public:
  explicit AutoCheckCannotGC(JSContext* cx = nullptr) : AutoAssertNoGC(cx) {}
} JS_HAZ_GC_INVALIDATED;
[Fixed Code]
class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoCheckCannotGC : public AutoAssertNoGC {
 public:
  explicit AutoCheckCannotGC(JSContext* cx = nullptr) : AutoAssertNoGC(cx) {}
#  ifdef MOZ_DIAGNOSTIC_ASSERT_ENABLED
  AutoCheckCannotGC(const AutoCheckCannotGC& other)
      : AutoCheckCannotGC(other.cx_) {}
#  else
  AutoCheckCannotGC(const AutoCheckCannotGC& other) : AutoCheckCannotGC() {}
#  endif
#else
class JS_PUBLIC_API AutoCheckCannotGC : public AutoRequireNoGC{
  public :
      explicit AutoCheckCannotGC(JSContext* cx = nullptr){} AutoCheckCannotGC(
          const AutoCheckCannotGC& other) : AutoCheckCannotGC(){}
#endif

Additional Details: The changes add copy constructors and modify class inheritance, which might relate to object lifecycle management, but again, it's unclear if this was fixing a specific vulnerability.

Note: While these changes appear to improve code safety and robustness, without more context about specific vulnerabilities they might be addressing, I can't definitively identify them as security fixes. The changes seem more like general code improvements and API refinements.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/selectors/old-tests/css3-modsel-86.xml+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/selectors/old-tests/css3-modsel-86.xml@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ ]]></style>   <link rel="author" title="Daniel Glazman" href="http://glazman.org/"/>   <link rel="help" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#selectors"/> <!-- bogus link to make sure it gets found -->-  <meta name="flags" content="" />  </head>  <body> <blockquote>

Analysis of the provided code diff:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no  
   No specific vulnerability found [File] testing/web-platform/tests/css/selectors/old-tests/css3-modsel-86.xml [Lines] 7  
   [Old Code] `<meta name="flags" content="" />`  
   [Fixed Code] (removed line)  

Additional Details:  
- The change simply removes an empty meta tag with a "flags" attribute, which doesn't appear to be security-related  
- This appears to be a test file cleanup rather than a security fix  
- No known vulnerability patterns or security issues are addressed by this change  
- The modification is likely related to test suite maintenance rather than security hardening

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-border-box-border-radius-003.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-border-box-border-radius-003.html@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@   <link rel="author" title="Mozilla" href="http://www.mozilla.org/">   <link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-1/#shapes-from-box-values">   <link rel="match" href="reference/shape-outside-border-box-border-radius-003-ref.html">-  <meta name="flags" content="">   <meta name="assert" content="Test the boxes are wrapping around the right float shape defined by the border-box and border-radius value.">   <style>   .container {

Analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 9]
   Old Code: `<meta name="flags" content="">`
   Fixed Code: (removed line)
   
   Additional Details: The diff shows removal of an empty meta tag for "flags". This appears to be a cleanup change rather than a security fix. Empty meta tags don't typically pose security risks.

2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
   Potential HTML injection/XSS if flags were improperly handled [File] [Lines 9]
   Old Code: `<meta name="flags" content="">`
   Fixed Code: (removed line)
   
   Additional Details: While unlikely, there's a theoretical possibility that if the "flags" meta tag was being processed in some way and the content attribute could be controlled by an attacker, it might have led to injection issues. However, since the content was empty and the line was simply removed, this is speculative at best.

Note: This appears to be a test file change, and test files typically don't contain production security vulnerabilities. The change seems to be removing an unused/unnecessary meta tag rather than fixing an actual security issue.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-sizing/ortho-writing-mode-001.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-sizing/ortho-writing-mode-001.html@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ <link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#intrinsic-sizes" title="first paragraph"> <link rel="help" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/css-writing-modes-4/#orthogonal-auto"> <link rel="match" href="../reference/ref-filled-green-100px-square.xht">-<meta name="flags" content="" /> <meta name="assert" content="The intrinsic size of an orthogonal child is its shrink to fit size after layout" /> <p>Test passes if there is a filled green square and <strong>no red</strong>.</p>

Analysis of the provided code diff:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no  
   [No specific vulnerability found] [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-sizing/ortho-writing-mode-001.html] [Lines 4-5]  
   [Old Code]  
   `<meta name="flags" content="" />`  
   [Fixed Code]  
   [This line was removed]  

Additional Details:  
- The change simply removes an empty meta tag (`flags`) which appears to be test-related metadata.  
- No security implications or vulnerabilities are apparent in this change.  
- The modification seems to be cleanup of test configuration rather than a security fix.  

No other vulnerabilities or suspicious changes were found in the provided diff.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/modules/libpref/init/static_prefs/src/lib.rs+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/modules/libpref/init/static_prefs/src/lib.rs@@ -8,7 +8,4 @@ //! `modules/libpref/init/generate_static_pref_list.py`, from //! `modules/libpref/init/StaticPrefList.yaml`.-include!(concat!(-    env!("MOZ_TOPOBJDIR"),-    "/modules/libpref/static_prefs.rs"-));+include!(mozbuild::objdir_path!("modules/libpref/static_prefs.rs"));

Let me analyze this code diff for security fixes:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Path Traversal or Build System Vulnerability] [modules/libpref/init/static_prefs/src/lib.rs] [Lines 8-11]
[Old Code]
include!(concat!(
    env!("MOZ_TOPOBJDIR"),
    "/modules/libpref/static_prefs.rs"
));
[Fixed Code]
include!(mozbuild::objdir_path!("modules/libpref/static_prefs.rs"));

Additional Details:
- The change replaces a direct environment variable concatenation with a safer path construction macro
- While not clearly a security vulnerability, direct use of env vars for file paths could potentially lead to path traversal if the environment is compromised
- The new version uses a dedicated macro (mozbuild::objdir_path!) which likely provides better path sanitization
- Without more context about the build system, it's hard to determine if this was actually exploitable
- This appears to be more of a robustness improvement than a direct security fix

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/layout/forms/nsSelectsAreaFrame.cpp+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/layout/forms/nsSelectsAreaFrame.cpp@@ -49,22 +49,6 @@                "Must have an nsListControlFrame!  Frame constructor is "                "broken");-  bool isInDropdownMode = list->IsInDropDownMode();--  // See similar logic in nsListControlFrame::Reflow and-  // nsListControlFrame::ReflowAsDropdown.  We need to match it here.-  WritingMode wm = aReflowInput.GetWritingMode();-  nscoord oldBSize;-  if (isInDropdownMode) {-    // Store the block size now in case it changes during-    // nsBlockFrame::Reflow for some odd reason.-    if (!HasAnyStateBits(NS_FRAME_FIRST_REFLOW)) {-      oldBSize = BSize(wm);-    } else {-      oldBSize = NS_UNCONSTRAINEDSIZE;-    }-  }-   nsBlockFrame::Reflow(aPresContext, aDesiredSize, aReflowInput, aStatus);   // Check whether we need to suppress scrollbar updates.  We want to do@@ -76,9 +60,7 @@     // comboboxes, we'll also need it if our block size changed.  If     // we're going to do a second pass, suppress scrollbar updates for     // this pass.-    if (newBSizeOfARow != mBSizeOfARow ||-        (isInDropdownMode &&-         (oldBSize != aDesiredSize.BSize(wm) || oldBSize != BSize(wm)))) {+    if (newBSizeOfARow != mBSizeOfARow) {       mBSizeOfARow = newBSizeOfARow;       list->SetSuppressScrollbarUpdate(true);     }

Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
    [Potential Logic Flaw] [layout/forms/nsSelectsAreaFrame.cpp] [Lines 49-76]
    [Old Code]
    bool isInDropdownMode = list->IsInDropDownMode();
    WritingMode wm = aReflowInput.GetWritingMode();
    nscoord oldBSize;
    if (isInDropdownMode) {
      if (!HasAnyStateBits(NS_FRAME_FIRST_REFLOW)) {
        oldBSize = BSize(wm);
      } else {
        oldBSize = NS_UNCONSTRAINEDSIZE;
      }
    }
    ...
    if (newBSizeOfARow != mBSizeOfARow ||
        (isInDropdownMode &&
         (oldBSize != aDesiredSize.BSize(wm) || oldBSize != BSize(wm)))) {
      mBSizeOfARow = newBSizeOfARow;
      list->SetSuppressScrollbarUpdate(true);
    }
    [Fixed Code]
    if (newBSizeOfARow != mBSizeOfARow) {
      mBSizeOfARow = newBSizeOfARow;
      list->SetSuppressScrollbarUpdate(true);
    }

Additional Details:
- The diff shows significant simplification of scrollbar update logic
- Removed the dropdown mode specific checks and oldBSize comparisons
- While this appears to be a bug fix, it's unclear if this was specifically addressing a security vulnerability or just improving general reliability
- The removed code could potentially have led to incorrect scrollbar behavior, but not clearly a security issue

No clear vulnerability name can be identified from this change. The modification appears to be more about fixing logical flow and simplifying conditions rather than addressing a specific security vulnerability.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/text/2d.text.font.parse.system.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/text/2d.text.font.parse.system.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.font = 'message-box'; _assertDifferent(ctx.font, 'message-box', "ctx.font", "'message-box'");

Let me analyze the code diff for potential security vulnerabilities:

Vulnerability Existed: no
No specific vulnerability found [File] testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/text/2d.text.font.parse.system.html [Lines] 17-18
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');

Analysis:
1. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming (from 'offscreenCanvas' to 'canvas')
2. No security-related changes are evident in the diff
3. The functionality remains identical, just with a different variable name
4. This appears to be a code style/readability improvement rather than a security fix

No known vulnerabilities are addressed by this change, and the modification doesn't introduce any new security concerns.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.dirty.outside.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.dirty.outside.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50)@@ -25,13 +25,13 @@ ctx.putImageData(imgdata, 200, 200, 0, 0, 100, 50); ctx.putImageData(imgdata, 40, 20, -30, -20, 30, 20); ctx.putImageData(imgdata, -30, 20, 0, 0, 30, 20);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 98,15, 0,255,0,255, "98,15", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 98,25, 0,255,0,255, "98,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 98,45, 0,255,0,255, "98,45", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 1,5, 0,255,0,255, "1,5", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 1,25, 0,255,0,255, "1,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 1,45, 0,255,0,255, "1,45", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 98,15, 0,255,0,255, "98,15", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 98,25, 0,255,0,255, "98,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 98,45, 0,255,0,255, "98,45", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 1,5, 0,255,0,255, "1,5", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 1,25, 0,255,0,255, "1,25", "0,255,0,255", 2);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 1,45, 0,255,0,255, "1,45", "0,255,0,255", 2); t.done(); });

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming (from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`) and updating the corresponding assertions to use the new variable name. The functionality remains the same.

Here's the structured response:

Vulnerability Existed: no
[No security vulnerability found] [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.put.dirty.outside.worker.js] [Lines 13-25]
[Old Code: var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d'); ... _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, ...)]
[Fixed Code: var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ... _assertPixelApprox(canvas, ...)]

The changes are purely cosmetic/refactoring in nature and don't address any security issues. The test's behavior and security implications remain unchanged.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.uncovered.image.destination-in.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.uncovered.image.destination-in.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba(0, 255, 255, 0.5)';@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ promise.then(function(response) {     createImageBitmap(response).then(bitmap => {         ctx.drawImage(bitmap, 40, 40, 10, 10, 40, 50, 10, 10);-        _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 15,15, 0,0,0,0, "15,15", "0,0,0,0", 5);-        _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0", 5);+        _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 15,15, 0,0,0,0, "15,15", "0,0,0,0", 5);+        _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0", 5);     }, t_fail); }).then(t_pass, t_fail);

After analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 13-14, 32-33]
   Old Code: 
   ```
   var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
   ```
   Fixed Code:
   ```
   var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
   ```

2. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 32-33]
   Old Code:
   ```
   _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 15,15, 0,0,0,0, "15,15", "0,0,0,0", 5);
   _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0", 5);
   ```
   Fixed Code:
   ```
   _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 15,15, 0,0,0,0, "15,15", "0,0,0,0", 5);
   _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0", 5);
   ```

The changes appear to be purely variable renaming (from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`) and don't indicate any security fixes. The functionality remains the same, just with a different variable name. No security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-size-baseline-001.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-size-baseline-001.html@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@   <meta name=assert content="contain:size does not suppress baseline alignment">   <link rel="match" href="reference/contain-baseline-ref.html">   <link rel=help href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-contain-1/#containment-size">-  <meta name="flags" content=""> <style> div {

Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze it for security fixes:

Vulnerability Existed: no
[No specific vulnerability] [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-contain/contain-size-baseline-001.html] [Lines 6]
[Old Code: <meta name="flags" content="">]
[Fixed Code: [line removed]]

Additional Details:
This appears to be a simple test file cleanup where an empty meta tag was removed. There's no indication of any security vulnerability being fixed here - it's just removing an unused or unnecessary tag from the test HTML file. The change doesn't affect any security-related functionality or introduce any security improvements.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.transparent.source-out.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.transparent.source-out.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba(0, 255, 0, 0.5)';@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'source-out'; ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba(0, 0, 255, 0.75)'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,0,255,96, "50,25", "0,0,255,96", 5);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,0,255,96, "50,25", "0,0,255,96", 5); t.done(); });

Based on the provided diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable name refactoring without any security implications. Here's the analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No Vulnerability Found [File] [Lines 17-18, 26]
   Old Code:
   var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
   [...]
   _assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,0,255,96, "50,25", "0,0,255,96", 5);

   Fixed Code:
   var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
   var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
   [...]
   _assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,0,255,96, "50,25", "0,0,255,96", 5);

The changes simply rename the variable `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` throughout the file, which doesn't appear to address any security vulnerability. The functionality remains identical.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/selectors/old-tests/css3-modsel-31.xml+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/selectors/old-tests/css3-modsel-31.xml@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ ]]></style>   <link rel="author" title="Daniel Glazman" href="http://glazman.org/"/>   <link rel="help" href="https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#selectors"/> <!-- bogus link to make sure it gets found -->-  <meta name="flags" content="" />  </head>  <body> <p class="red">This paragraph should have green background</p>

After analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment:

Vulnerability Existed: no
[No specific vulnerability found] [testing/web-platform/tests/css/selectors/old-tests/css3-modsel-31.xml] [Lines 8]
[Old Code]
  <meta name="flags" content="" />
[Fixed Code]
[Removed line]

Additional Details:
1. The change simply removes an empty meta tag with a "flags" attribute, which appears to be test-related metadata.
2. There's no security vulnerability being fixed here - this is likely just test cleanup or maintenance.
3. The "flags" meta tag wasn't serving any security purpose and its removal doesn't impact security.
4. This change is part of routine test file maintenance rather than a security fix.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-grid/parsing/grid-template-shorthand-valid.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-grid/parsing/grid-template-shorthand-valid.html@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ test_valid_value("grid-template", '[a] "a" 10px [a]'); test_valid_value("grid-template", '"a"'); test_valid_value("grid-template", '"a" auto', '"a"');+test_valid_value("grid-template", '"a a a"', '"a a a"'); test_valid_value("grid-template", '"a" / 10px'); test_valid_value("grid-template", '"a" / 20%'); test_valid_value("grid-template", '"a" / 5fr');

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security-related fixes. The changes appear to be test case additions for CSS grid template shorthand validation. Here's my analysis:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
    No security vulnerability found [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-grid/parsing/grid-template-shorthand-valid.html] [Lines 28-31]
    Old Code: (no test case for '"a a a"')
    Fixed Code: test_valid_value("grid-template", '"a a a"', '"a a a"');

The diff simply adds a new test case for grid-template shorthand validation, specifically testing the case with multiple repeated identifiers in quotes. This appears to be a test coverage improvement rather than a security fix. No vulnerabilities were identified in this change.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.image.transparent.1.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.image.transparent.1.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ promise.then(function(response) {     createImageBitmap(response).then(bitmap => {         ctx.drawImage(bitmap, 0, -50);-        _assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+        _assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");     }, t_fail); }).then(t_pass, t_fail);

After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't find any security vulnerabilities. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming (from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`) and don't involve any security-sensitive operations or patterns. Here's the structured response:

Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found in the diff. The changes are purely variable renaming and don't affect security.

Additional Details:
- The changes are consistent throughout the file (variable name change)
- No security-sensitive operations were modified
- The test assertions remain functionally identical
- No new security risks were introduced

The diff shows only these changes:
1. `offscreenCanvas` renamed to `canvas` in variable declaration
2. `offscreenCanvas` renamed to `canvas` in assertion call
3. No changes to actual test logic or security-relevant operations

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-margin-box-border-radius-001.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-margin-box-border-radius-001.html@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@   <link rel="author" title="Mozilla" href="http://www.mozilla.org/">   <link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-1/#shapes-from-box-values">   <link rel="match" href="reference/shape-outside-margin-box-border-radius-001-ref.html">-  <meta name="flags" content="">   <meta name="assert" content="Test the boxes are wrapping around the left float shape defined by the margin-box and border-radius value.">   <style>   .container {

Analysis of the code diff:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no
   No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 9]
   [Old Code] <meta name="flags" content="">
   [Fixed Code] (line removed)

Additional notes:
- The diff shows removal of an empty meta "flags" tag, which doesn't appear to be security-related
- This appears to be a test file cleanup rather than a security fix
- No known vulnerability patterns or security issues are addressed by this change
- The modification is related to test metadata rather than functional code

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/accessible/windows/ia2/ia2Accessible.cpp+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/accessible/windows/ia2/ia2Accessible.cpp@@ -249,12 +249,9 @@   *aSimilarItemsInGroup = 0;   *aPositionInGroup = 0;-  if (!Acc()) {-    return CO_E_OBJNOTCONNECTED;-  }-  AccessibleWrap* acc = LocalAcc();-  if (!acc) {-    return E_NOTIMPL;  // XXX Not supported for RemoteAccessible yet.+  Accessible* acc = Acc();+  if (!acc) {+    return CO_E_OBJNOTCONNECTED;   }   GroupPos groupPos = acc->GroupPosition();

Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:

Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Error Handling Improvement] [accessible/windows/ia2/ia2Accessible.cpp] [Lines 249-258]
[Old Code]
  if (!Acc()) {
    return CO_E_OBJNOTCONNECTED;
  }
  AccessibleWrap* acc = LocalAcc();
  if (!acc) {
    return E_NOTIMPL;  // XXX Not supported for RemoteAccessible yet.
  }
[Fixed Code]
  Accessible* acc = Acc();
  if (!acc) {
    return CO_E_OBJNOTCONNECTED;
  }

Notes:
1. The change simplifies the error handling flow by removing the separate check for LocalAcc() and using a more general Accessible* type.
2. The main change appears to be error handling improvement rather than a direct security fix.
3. The removal of the E_NOTIMPL return path might indicate better support for RemoteAccessible cases.
4. While this doesn't appear to fix a specific vulnerability, it does make the error handling more consistent by always returning CO_E_OBJNOTCONNECTED for invalid accessibles.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas/2d.canvas.reference.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas/2d.canvas.reference.worker.js@@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');-_assertSame(ctx.canvas, offscreenCanvas, "ctx.canvas", "offscreenCanvas");+_assertSame(ctx.canvas, canvas, "ctx.canvas", "canvas"); t.done(); });

Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no  
No specific vulnerability [File] testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/the-offscreen-canvas/2d.canvas.reference.worker.js [Lines] 13-17  
[Old Code]  
```javascript
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertSame(ctx.canvas, offscreenCanvas, "ctx.canvas", "offscreenCanvas");
```  
[Fixed Code]  
```javascript
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertSame(ctx.canvas, canvas, "ctx.canvas", "canvas");
```  
Additional Details: This appears to be a simple variable renaming change from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` for consistency or clarity. There's no indication of a security vulnerability being fixed here. The change is purely cosmetic/readability-related.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.

--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/calc-max-width-block-intrinsic-1-ref.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/calc-max-width-block-intrinsic-1-ref.html@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ <head>   <title>CSS Reference: intrinsic width of max-width: calc() on blocks</title>   <link rel="author" title="L. David Baron" href="https://dbaron.org/">-  <meta name="flags" content=""> <style type="text/css"> body > div { margin: 0 0 1px 0; background: blue; color: white; height: 5px }

Analysis of the provided code diff:

1. Vulnerability Existed: no  
   No specific vulnerability found  
   File: testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/calc-max-width-block-intrinsic-1-ref.html  
   Lines: 3  
   Old Code: `<meta name="flags" content="">`  
   Fixed Code: (line removed)  

Additional details:  
- The diff shows only the removal of an empty meta tag with a "flags" attribute, which appears to be test-related metadata rather than a security fix.  
- No known vulnerabilities are associated with this change.  
- The modification seems to be cleanup/refactoring rather than a security patch.  

No other vulnerabilities or potential security issues were identified in the provided diff.

If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.