Shared security patch analysis results
AI Used: DEEPSEEK deepseek-chat--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/jpeg-xl/lib/jxl/dec_frame.h+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/jpeg-xl/lib/jxl/dec_frame.h@@ -54,8 +54,11 @@ public: // All parameters must outlive the FrameDecoder. FrameDecoder(PassesDecoderState* dec_state, const CodecMetadata& metadata,- ThreadPool* pool)- : dec_state_(dec_state), pool_(pool), frame_header_(&metadata) {}+ ThreadPool* pool, bool use_slow_rendering_pipeline)+ : dec_state_(dec_state),+ pool_(pool),+ frame_header_(&metadata),+ use_slow_rendering_pipeline_(use_slow_rendering_pipeline) {} // `constraints` must outlive the FrameDecoder if not null, or stay alive // until the next call to SetFrameSizeLimits.@@ -134,6 +137,15 @@ // Returns whether a DC image has been decoded, accessible at low resolution // at passes.shared_storage.dc_storage bool HasDecodedDC() const { return finalized_dc_; }+ bool HasDecodedAll() const { return NumSections() == num_sections_done_; }++ // If enabled, ProcessSections will stop and return true when the DC+ // sections have been processed, instead of starting the AC sections. This+ // will only occur if supported (that is, flushing will produce a valid+ // 1/8th*1/8th resolution image). The return value of true then does not mean+ // all sections have been processed, use HasDecodedDC and HasDecodedAll+ // to check the true finished state.+ void SetPauseAtProgressive() { pause_at_progressive_ = true; } // Sets the buffer to which uint8 sRGB pixels will be decoded. This is not // supported for all images. If it succeeds, HasRGBBuffer() will return true.@@ -196,11 +208,14 @@ Status ProcessDCGlobal(BitReader* br); Status ProcessDCGroup(size_t dc_group_id, BitReader* br); void FinalizeDC();- void AllocateOutput();+ Status AllocateOutput();+ void PreparePipeline(); Status ProcessACGlobal(BitReader* br); Status ProcessACGroup(size_t ac_group_id, BitReader* JXL_RESTRICT* br, size_t num_passes, size_t thread, bool force_draw, bool dc_only);+ void MarkSections(const SectionInfo* sections, size_t num,+ SectionStatus* section_status); // Allocates storage for parallel decoding using up to `num_threads` threads // of up to `num_tasks` tasks. The value of `thread` passed to@@ -214,6 +229,9 @@ } dec_state_->EnsureStorage(storage_size); use_task_id_ = num_threads > num_tasks;+ if (dec_state_->render_pipeline) {+ dec_state_->render_pipeline->PrepareForThreads(storage_size);+ } } size_t GetStorageLocation(size_t thread, size_t task) {@@ -262,7 +280,9 @@ std::vector<uint8_t> decoded_dc_groups_; bool decoded_dc_global_; bool decoded_ac_global_;+ bool HasEverything() const; bool finalized_dc_ = true;+ size_t num_sections_done_ = 0; bool is_finalized_ = true; size_t num_renders_ = 0; bool allocated_ = false;@@ -275,6 +295,11 @@ // Whether or not the task id should be used for storage indexing, instead of // the thread id. bool use_task_id_ = false;++ // Testing setting: whether or not to use the slow rendering pipeline.+ bool use_slow_rendering_pipeline_;++ bool pause_at_progressive_ = false; }; } // namespace jxl
Let me analyze the code diff for potential security vulnerabilities:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Thread Safety Issue] [third_party/jpeg-xl/lib/jxl/dec_frame.h] [Lines 54-58, 229-232]
[Old Code]
FrameDecoder(PassesDecoderState* dec_state, const CodecMetadata& metadata,
ThreadPool* pool)
: dec_state_(dec_state), pool_(pool), frame_header_(&metadata) {}
[Fixed Code]
FrameDecoder(PassesDecoderState* dec_state, const CodecMetadata& metadata,
ThreadPool* pool, bool use_slow_rendering_pipeline)
: dec_state_(dec_state),
pool_(pool),
frame_header_(&metadata),
use_slow_rendering_pipeline_(use_slow_rendering_pipeline) {}
Additional Details: The changes introduce thread-related modifications including thread preparation and a new rendering pipeline flag. While not clearly a vulnerability, changes to thread handling could potentially introduce race conditions if not properly synchronized.
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Resource Management Issue] [third_party/jpeg-xl/lib/jxl/dec_frame.h] [Lines 196-197]
[Old Code]
void AllocateOutput();
[Fixed Code]
Status AllocateOutput();
void PreparePipeline();
Additional Details: The change from void to Status return type for AllocateOutput() suggests better error handling for resource allocation, which could prevent potential resource exhaustion or memory corruption issues.
3. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential State Validation Issue] [third_party/jpeg-xl/lib/jxl/dec_frame.h] [Lines 134-137]
[Old Code]
bool HasDecodedDC() const { return finalized_dc_; }
[Fixed Code]
bool HasDecodedDC() const { return finalized_dc_; }
bool HasDecodedAll() const { return NumSections() == num_sections_done_; }
Additional Details: The addition of HasDecodedAll() with section counting could help prevent state validation issues, though it's unclear if this fixes an existing vulnerability.
Note: While several changes were made to improve functionality and potentially security (like better state tracking and error handling), no clear security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff. The changes appear to be more about adding features (progressive decoding control) and improving robustness rather than fixing specific vulnerabilities.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.uncovered.fill.destination-in.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.uncovered.fill.destination-in.worker.js@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba(0, 255, 0, 0.5)';@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba(0, 0, 255, 0.75)'; ctx.translate(0, 25); ctx.fillRect(0, 50, 100, 50);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0", 5);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0", 5); t.done(); });
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely cosmetic/refactoring changes (variable renaming) rather than security fixes. Here's the structured response:
Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.uncovered.fill.destination-in.worker.js] [Lines 14-24]
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
[...]
_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0", 5);
[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
[...]
_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,0,0,0, "50,25", "0,0,0,0", 5);
The changes simply rename the variable `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` throughout the file, which doesn't affect security. The functionality remains identical.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-ui/outline-style-013.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-ui/outline-style-013.html@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ <link rel="help" title="7.3. 'outline-style' property" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ui/#outline-style"> <link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#value-def-border-style"> <link rel="match" href="reference/outline-style-013-ref.html">-<meta name="flags" content=""> <meta name="assert" content="Test checks that the outline style is dashed when outline-style set dashed"> <style> #test {
Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities: Vulnerability Existed: no No specific vulnerability found [File] testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-ui/outline-style-013.html [Lines] 6 [Old Code] <meta name="flags" content=""> [Fixed Code] (removed line) Additional Details: 1. The change simply removes an empty meta tag for "flags" which was likely unnecessary in the test file. 2. This doesn't appear to be a security-related fix but rather a cleanup of test metadata. 3. No known vulnerability patterns (XSS, injection, etc.) are present in this change. 4. The modification doesn't affect any security-sensitive functionality. No other vulnerabilities were detected in this diff. The change appears to be purely related to test file maintenance rather than security fixes.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/third_party/rust/blake2b_simd/src/lib.rs+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/third_party/rust/blake2b_simd/src/lib.rs@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@-//! [](https://github.com/oconnor663/blake2_simd) [](https://crates.io/crates/blake2b_simd) [](https://travis-ci.org/oconnor663/blake2_simd)+//! [](https://github.com/oconnor663/blake2_simd) [](https://crates.io/crates/blake2b_simd) [](https://github.com/oconnor663/blake2_simd/actions) //! //! An implementation of the BLAKE2b and BLAKE2bp hash functions. See also //! [`blake2s_simd`](https://docs.rs/blake2s_simd).
After analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment: Vulnerability Existed: no [No vulnerability found] [third_party/rust/blake2b_simd/src/lib.rs] [Lines 1] [Old Code] `//! [](https://github.com/oconnor663/blake2_simd) [](https://crates.io/crates/blake2b_simd) [](https://travis-ci.org/oconnor663/blake2_simd)` [Fixed Code] `//! [](https://github.com/oconnor663/blake2_simd) [](https://crates.io/crates/blake2b_simd) [](https://github.com/oconnor663/blake2_simd/actions)` Additional Details: The change only updates the build status badge from Travis CI to GitHub Actions. This is purely a CI/CD configuration change and doesn't affect the security of the code. No security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.hsla-clamp-5.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.hsla-clamp-5.html@@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillStyle = 'hsla(120, 100%, 50%, 2)'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
Based on the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming and don't involve any security-sensitive operations. Here's the analysis following your requested format:
Vulnerability Existed: no
[No vulnerability found] [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.hsla-clamp-5.html] [Lines 17-25]
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
The changes are:
1. Renaming variable `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`
2. Updating the variable name in the `_assertPixel` call accordingly
These changes don't appear to address any security issues but rather improve code consistency or readability.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/mobile/android/geckoview/src/main/java/org/mozilla/geckoview/PanZoomController.java+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/mobile/android/geckoview/src/main/java/org/mozilla/geckoview/PanZoomController.java@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ @Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE) @IntDef({SCROLL_BEHAVIOR_SMOOTH, SCROLL_BEHAVIOR_AUTO})- /* package */ @interface ScrollBehaviorType {}+ public @interface ScrollBehaviorType {} /** Specifies smooth scrolling which animates content to the desired scroll position. */ public static final int SCROLL_BEHAVIOR_SMOOTH = 0;@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ INPUT_RESULT_HANDLED_CONTENT, INPUT_RESULT_IGNORED })- /* package */ @interface InputResult {}+ public @interface InputResult {} /** * Specifies that an input event was not handled by the PanZoomController for a panning or zooming@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ SCROLLABLE_FLAG_BOTTOM, SCROLLABLE_FLAG_LEFT })- /* package */ @interface ScrollableDirections {}+ public @interface ScrollableDirections {} /** * Represents which directions can be scrolled in the scroll container where an input event was * handled. This value is only useful in the case of {@link@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ @IntDef( flag = true, value = {OVERSCROLL_FLAG_NONE, OVERSCROLL_FLAG_HORIZONTAL, OVERSCROLL_FLAG_VERTICAL})- /* package */ @interface OverscrollDirections {}+ public @interface OverscrollDirections {} /** * Represents which directions can be over-scrolled in the scroll container where an input event * was handled. This value is only useful in the case of {@link
Here's the analysis following the specified format:
Vulnerability Existed: no
[Access Control Change] [mobile/android/geckoview/src/main/java/org/mozilla/geckoview/PanZoomController.java] [Lines 43, 57, 93, 114]
[Old Code]
/* package */ @interface ScrollBehaviorType {}
/* package */ @interface InputResult {}
/* package */ @interface ScrollableDirections {}
/* package */ @interface OverscrollDirections {}
[Fixed Code]
public @interface ScrollBehaviorType {}
public @interface InputResult {}
public @interface ScrollableDirections {}
public @interface OverscrollDirections {}
Additional Details:
The changes involve modifying the visibility of several annotation interfaces from package-private to public. This doesn't appear to be a security fix but rather an API visibility change. There are no obvious security vulnerabilities being addressed here - the change simply makes these annotations more widely accessible. The modification could be related to making these interfaces available to other components that need to use them, but it doesn't represent a security vulnerability fix.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/toolkit/components/aboutconfig/content/aboutconfig.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/toolkit/components/aboutconfig/content/aboutconfig.html@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ href="chrome://global/content/aboutconfig/aboutconfig.css"> <link rel="localization" href="branding/brand.ftl"> <link rel="localization" href="toolkit/about/config.ftl">+ <link rel="icon" href="chrome://global/skin/icons/settings.svg"/> <script src="chrome://global/content/aboutconfig/aboutconfig.js"></script> <title data-l10n-id="about-config-page-title"></title> </head>
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff: Vulnerability Existed: no [No specific vulnerability] [toolkit/components/aboutconfig/content/aboutconfig.html] [Lines 16-16] [Old Code] (No icon link present) [Fixed Code] `<link rel="icon" href="chrome://global/skin/icons/settings.svg"/>` Additional Details: The diff shows the addition of a favicon link to the page. This is not a security fix but rather a UI improvement to provide a proper icon for the about:config page. There are no security vulnerabilities being addressed in this change. The modification simply adds a visual element to the page header.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/gfx/gl/SharedSurfaceEGL.cpp+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/gfx/gl/SharedSurfaceEGL.cpp@@ -246,6 +246,10 @@ return mSurface->GetAvailable(); }+bool SharedSurface_SurfaceTexture::IsValid() const {+ return !mSurface->IsReleased();+}+ Maybe<layers::SurfaceDescriptor> SharedSurface_SurfaceTexture::ToSurfaceDescriptor() { return Some(layers::SurfaceTextureDescriptor(
Analyzing the provided code diff for security fixes:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Null Pointer Dereference] [gfx/gl/SharedSurfaceEGL.cpp] [Lines 246-250]
[Old Code]
return mSurface->GetAvailable();
[Fixed Code]
bool SharedSurface_SurfaceTexture::IsValid() const {
return !mSurface->IsReleased();
}
Additional Details:
- The diff adds a new `IsValid()` function that checks if the surface is released before operations
- This appears to be a defensive programming measure that could prevent null pointer dereferences or use-after-release scenarios
- Without more context about how `mSurface` is managed, we can't be certain if this fixes an actual vulnerability or is just preventative
- The change suggests there might have been potential for security issues when operating on released surfaces
Note: The diff doesn't show any actual vulnerability being exploited, just the addition of a safety check. This could be either proactive hardening or fixing a known issue. More context would be needed to determine if this was fixing a specific vulnerability.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/docs/requirements.txt+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/docs/requirements.txt@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ sphinx-argparse==0.3.1 sphinx-autobuild==0.7.1 sphinx-js==3.1.2-sphinx==4.3.2+sphinx==4.4.0
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff: Vulnerability Existed: yes Dependency Version Update (Potential Security Fix) [File] testing/web-platform/tests/docs/requirements.txt [Lines] 5 [Old Code] sphinx==4.3.2 [Fixed Code] sphinx==4.4.0 Additional Details: - The diff shows an update of the Sphinx documentation generator from version 4.3.2 to 4.4.0 - While the diff doesn't explicitly state the security reasons for the update, such dependency updates often include security fixes - Checking Sphinx's changelog would be needed to confirm specific vulnerabilities addressed in this version bump - This appears to be a proactive maintenance update that likely includes security improvements among other fixes Note: Without access to Sphinx's release notes for version 4.4.0, I cannot specify the exact vulnerability names that might have been fixed. However, dependency updates to newer versions typically include security patches.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.gradient.transparent.1.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.gradient.transparent.1.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); var gradient = ctx.createLinearGradient(0, 0, 100, 0); gradient.addColorStop(0, 'rgba(0,0,0,0)');@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ ctx.shadowOffsetY = 50; ctx.fillStyle = gradient; ctx.fillRect(0, -50, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
Based on the provided code diff, here's the analysis:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 17-18, 29]
Old Code:
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
Fixed Code:
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
Additional Details:
This appears to be a simple variable renaming change from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`. There are no security implications in this change - it's purely a code style/readability modification. The functionality remains exactly the same, just with a different variable name. No security vulnerabilities were addressed or introduced by this change.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/calc-width-table-fixed-1.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/calc-width-table-fixed-1.html@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ <link rel="author" title="L. David Baron" href="https://dbaron.org/"> <link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#calc-notation"> <link rel="match" href="calc-width-table-fixed-1-ref.html">- <meta name="flags" content=""> <style type="text/css"> table { table-layout: fixed; width: 500px; border-spacing: 0 } </style>
Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no Meta Tag Removal [File] [Lines 5] [Old Code] `<meta name="flags" content="">` [Fixed Code] (removed) Additional Details: - The change simply removes an empty meta tag that wasn't serving any apparent purpose. - There's no security vulnerability being fixed here, just a minor cleanup of HTML markup. - The "flags" meta tag was sometimes used for test configuration but wasn't being utilized in this case. - No security-related changes are apparent in this diff.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-color/t424-hsl-values-b-7.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-color/t424-hsl-values-b-7.html@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ <link rel="author" title="Intel" href="http://www.intel.com"> <link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#hsl-color" /> <link rel="match" href="t424-hsl-values-b-7-ref.html" />-<meta name="flags" content="" /> <meta name="assert" content="Implementation of algorithm for converting hsl() colors to rgb() colors." /> <style> table { border-spacing: 0; padding: 0; border: none; }
Based on the provided code diff, I'll analyze it for potential security vulnerabilities:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
Meta Tag Removal [File] [Lines 6]
[Old Code]
<meta name="flags" content="" />
[Fixed Code]
(removed line)
Additional Details:
- The change simply removes an empty meta tag that wasn't serving any apparent purpose.
- There's no security vulnerability being fixed here - this appears to be a minor cleanup or maintenance change.
- The "flags" meta tag wasn't being used (empty content) and its removal doesn't impact security.
- No known vulnerability is associated with this type of change.
Note: I've followed the format even though no vulnerability was found, as per the instructions. The change appears to be non-security related code cleanup.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.rgba-solid-4.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.rgba-solid-4.worker.js@@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba( -0 , 255 , +0 , 1 )'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for potential security vulnerabilities:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
No specific vulnerability found [File] testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.rgba-solid-4.worker.js [Lines] 13-21
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
The changes appear to be purely cosmetic, renaming a variable from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`. There's no indication of any security vulnerability being fixed in this change. The modification doesn't affect any security-sensitive operations, input validation, or data handling. It's simply a variable naming convention change.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.invalid.css-color-4-hsla-2.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.fillStyle.parse.invalid.css-color-4-hsla-2.worker.js@@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#0f0'; try { ctx.fillStyle = 'hsla(0 100% 50%, 1)'; } catch (e) { } // this shouldn't throw, but it shouldn't matter here if it does ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 13-14, 20]
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(canvas, 50,25, 0,255,0,255, "50,25", "0,255,0,255");
This appears to be a simple variable renaming change (from 'offscreenCanvas' to 'canvas') with no security implications. The functionality remains the same, and there are no security-related patterns or vulnerabilities being addressed in this diff. The change is purely cosmetic/readability improvement.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/dom/filesystem/compat/CallbackRunnables.cpp+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/dom/filesystem/compat/CallbackRunnables.cpp@@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ } void GetEntryHelper::ResolvedCallback(JSContext* aCx,- JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue) {+ JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue,+ ErrorResult& aRv) { if (NS_WARN_IF(!aValue.isObject())) { return; }@@ -225,7 +226,8 @@ } void GetEntryHelper::RejectedCallback(JSContext* aCx,- JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue) {+ JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue,+ ErrorResult& aRv) { Error(NS_ERROR_DOM_NOT_FOUND_ERR); }
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Error Handling Improvement] [dom/filesystem/compat/CallbackRunnables.cpp] [Lines 160-161, 225-226]
[Old Code]
```cpp
void GetEntryHelper::ResolvedCallback(JSContext* aCx,
JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue)
```
[Fixed Code]
```cpp
void GetEntryHelper::ResolvedCallback(JSContext* aCx,
JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue,
ErrorResult& aRv)
```
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Error Handling Improvement] [dom/filesystem/compat/CallbackRunnables.cpp] [Lines 225-226]
[Old Code]
```cpp
void GetEntryHelper::RejectedCallback(JSContext* aCx,
JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue)
```
[Fixed Code]
```cpp
void GetEntryHelper::RejectedCallback(JSContext* aCx,
JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue,
ErrorResult& aRv)
```
The main change in both cases is the addition of an `ErrorResult& aRv` parameter to both callback functions. While this doesn't clearly indicate a specific vulnerability fix, it suggests improved error handling capabilities. The modification allows these callback functions to properly propagate errors back to the caller through the ErrorResult object, which could potentially prevent unhandled exceptions or error conditions. Without more context about the specific vulnerabilities being addressed, we can't definitively identify a security issue, but the changes do represent an improvement in error handling infrastructure.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/dom/media/AudioStream.h+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/dom/media/AudioStream.h@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ # include "mozilla/Result.h" # include "mozilla/TimeStamp.h" # include "mozilla/UniquePtr.h"+# include "mozilla/SPSCQueue.h" # include "nsCOMPtr.h" # include "nsThreadUtils.h" # include "WavDumper.h"@@ -38,57 +39,81 @@ class FrameHistory; class AudioConfig;+// A struct that contains the number of frames serviced or underrun by a+// callback, alongside the sample-rate for this callback (in case of playback+// rate change, it can be variable).+struct CallbackInfo {+ CallbackInfo() = default;+ CallbackInfo(uint32_t aServiced, uint32_t aUnderrun, uint32_t aOutputRate)+ : mServiced(aServiced), mUnderrun(aUnderrun), mOutputRate(aOutputRate) {}+ uint32_t mServiced = 0;+ uint32_t mUnderrun = 0;+ uint32_t mOutputRate = 0;+};+ class AudioClock { public:- AudioClock();-- // Initialize the clock with the current sampling rate.- // Need to be called before querying the clock.- void Init(uint32_t aRate);+ explicit AudioClock(uint32_t aInRate); // Update the number of samples that has been written in the audio backend.- // Called on the state machine thread.- void UpdateFrameHistory(uint32_t aServiced, uint32_t aUnderrun);+ // Called on the audio thread only.+ void UpdateFrameHistory(uint32_t aServiced, uint32_t aUnderrun,+ bool aAudioThreadChanged); /** * @param aFrames The playback position in frames of the audio engine. * @return The playback position in frames of the stream, * adjusted by playback rate changes and underrun frames. */- int64_t GetPositionInFrames(int64_t aFrames) const;+ int64_t GetPositionInFrames(int64_t aFrames); /** * @param frames The playback position in frames of the audio engine. * @return The playback position in microseconds of the stream, * adjusted by playback rate changes and underrun frames. */- int64_t GetPosition(int64_t frames) const;+ int64_t GetPosition(int64_t frames); // Set the playback rate.- // Called on the audio thread.+ // Called on the audio thread only. void SetPlaybackRate(double aPlaybackRate); // Get the current playback rate.- // Called on the audio thread.+ // Called on the audio thread only. double GetPlaybackRate() const; // Set if we are preserving the pitch.- // Called on the audio thread.+ // Called on the audio thread only. void SetPreservesPitch(bool aPreservesPitch); // Get the current pitch preservation state.- // Called on the audio thread.+ // Called on the audio thread only. bool GetPreservesPitch() const;+ // Called on either thread. uint32_t GetInputRate() const { return mInRate; } uint32_t GetOutputRate() const { return mOutRate; } private:- // Output rate in Hz (characteristic of the playback rate)- uint32_t mOutRate;- // Input rate in Hz (characteristic of the media being played)- uint32_t mInRate;- // True if the we are timestretching, false if we are resampling.+ // Output rate in Hz (characteristic of the playback rate). Written on the+ // audio thread, read on either thread.+ Atomic<uint32_t> mOutRate;+ // Input rate in Hz (characteristic of the media being played).+ const uint32_t mInRate;+ // True if the we are timestretching, false if we are resampling. Accessed on+ // the audio thread only. bool mPreservesPitch; // The history of frames sent to the audio engine in each DataCallback.+ // Only accessed from non-audio threads on macOS, accessed on both threads and+ // protected by the AudioStream monitor on other platforms. const UniquePtr<FrameHistory> mFrameHistory;+# ifdef XP_MACOSX+ // Enqueued on the audio thread, dequeued from the other thread. The maximum+ // size of this queue has been chosen empirically.+ SPSCQueue<CallbackInfo> mCallbackInfoQueue{100};+ // If it isn't possible to send the callback info to the non-audio thread,+ // store them here until it's possible to send them. This is an unlikely+ // fallback path. The size of this array has been chosen empirically. Only+ // ever accessed on the audio thread.+ AutoTArray<CallbackInfo, 5> mAudioThreadCallbackInfo;+# endif }; /*@@ -134,7 +159,7 @@ * A helper class to encapsulate pointer arithmetic and provide means to modify * the underlying audio buffer. */-class AudioBufferWriter : private AudioBufferCursor {+class AudioBufferWriter : public AudioBufferCursor { public: AudioBufferWriter(Span<AudioDataValue> aSpan, uint32_t aChannels, uint32_t aFrames)@@ -193,9 +218,10 @@ class DataSource { public:- // Return a chunk which contains at most aFrames frames or zero if no- // frames in the source at all.- virtual UniquePtr<Chunk> PopFrames(uint32_t aFrames) = 0;+ // Attempt to acquire aFrames frames of audio, and returns the number of+ // frames successfuly acquired.+ virtual uint32_t PopFrames(AudioDataValue* aAudio, uint32_t aFrames,+ bool aAudioThreadChanged) = 0; // Return true if no more data will be added to the source. virtual bool Ended() const = 0;@@ -203,15 +229,14 @@ virtual ~DataSource() = default; };- explicit AudioStream(DataSource& aSource);-- // Initialize the audio stream. aNumChannels is the number of audio- // channels (1 for mono, 2 for stereo, etc), aChannelMap is the indicator for- // channel layout(mono, stereo, 5.1 or 7.1 ) and aRate is the sample rate+ // aOutputChannels is the number of audio channels (1 for mono, 2 for stereo,+ // etc), aChannelMap is the indicator for channel layout(mono, stereo, 5.1 or+ // 7.1 ). Initialize the audio stream.and aRate is the sample rate // (22050Hz, 44100Hz, etc).- nsresult Init(uint32_t aNumChannels,- AudioConfig::ChannelLayout::ChannelMap aChannelMap,- uint32_t aRate, AudioDeviceInfo* aSinkInfo);+ AudioStream(DataSource& aSource, uint32_t aInRate, uint32_t aOutputChannels,+ AudioConfig::ChannelLayout::ChannelMap aChannelMap);++ nsresult Init(AudioDeviceInfo* aSinkInfo); // Closes the stream. All future use of the stream is an error. void Shutdown();@@ -286,26 +311,29 @@ long DataCallback(void* aBuffer, long aFrames); void StateCallback(cubeb_state aState);- nsresult EnsureTimeStretcherInitializedUnlocked();+ // Audio thread only+ nsresult EnsureTimeStretcherInitialized();+ void GetUnprocessed(AudioBufferWriter& aWriter);+ void GetTimeStretched(AudioBufferWriter& aWriter);+ void UpdatePlaybackRateIfNeeded(); // Return true if audio frames are valid (correct sampling rate and valid // channel count) otherwise false. bool IsValidAudioFormat(Chunk* aChunk);- void GetUnprocessed(AudioBufferWriter& aWriter);- void GetTimeStretched(AudioBufferWriter& aWriter);- template <typename Function, typename... Args> int InvokeCubeb(Function aFunction, Args&&... aArgs); bool CheckThreadIdChanged();-- // The monitor is held to protect all access to member variables.+ void AssertIsOnAudioThread() const;++ soundtouch::SoundTouch* mTimeStretcher;++ // The monitor is held to protect all access to member variables below. Monitor mMonitor;- uint32_t mChannels;- uint32_t mOutChannels;+ const uint32_t mOutChannels;+ const AudioConfig::ChannelLayout::ChannelMap mChannelMap; AudioClock mAudioClock;- soundtouch::SoundTouch* mTimeStretcher; WavDumper mDumpFile;@@ -325,8 +353,6 @@ DataSource& mDataSource;- bool mPrefillQuirk;- // The device info of the current sink. If null // the default device is used. It is set // during the Init() in decoder thread.@@ -336,7 +362,12 @@ const bool mSandboxed = false; MozPromiseHolder<MediaSink::EndedPromise> mEndedPromise;- Atomic<bool> mPlaybackComplete;+ std::atomic<bool> mPlaybackComplete;+ // Both written on the MDSM thread, read on the audio thread.+ std::atomic<float> mPlaybackRate;+ std::atomic<bool> mPreservesPitch;+ // Audio thread only+ bool mAudioThreadChanged = false; }; } // namespace mozilla
I'll analyze the code diff for security vulnerabilities following the specified format.
1. Vulnerability Existed: yes
Race Condition Vulnerability [dom/media/AudioStream.h] [Lines 38-81, 286-362]
[Old Code]
- Various member variables (mOutRate, mPreservesPitch, etc.) accessed from multiple threads without proper synchronization
- No thread safety guarantees for shared state
[Fixed Code]
- Added Atomic types for shared variables (mOutRate)
- Added thread-specific access restrictions (comments indicating "Audio thread only")
- Added SPSCQueue for safe cross-thread communication on macOS
- Added atomic variables for thread-safe access (mPlaybackComplete, mPlaybackRate, mPreservesPitch)
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
Potential Memory Safety Issue [dom/media/AudioStream.h] [Lines 134-159]
[Old Code]
class AudioBufferWriter : private AudioBufferCursor
[Fixed Code]
class AudioBufferWriter : public AudioBufferCursor
The change in inheritance might affect memory access patterns, but it's unclear if this was fixing a specific vulnerability.
3. Vulnerability Existed: yes
Thread Safety Vulnerability [dom/media/AudioStream.h] [Lines 193-203]
[Old Code]
virtual UniquePtr<Chunk> PopFrames(uint32_t aFrames) = 0;
[Fixed Code]
virtual uint32_t PopFrames(AudioDataValue* aAudio, uint32_t aFrames,
bool aAudioThreadChanged) = 0;
The change removes heap allocation from the audio thread callback path, which could potentially lead to thread safety issues or audio glitches under heavy load.
4. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
Potential Integer Overflow [dom/media/AudioStream.h] [Lines 38-81]
[Old Code]
No explicit overflow checks in frame counting
[Fixed Code]
Added CallbackInfo struct with explicit frame counting
While the new code provides better tracking of frames, it's unclear if this was specifically addressing an overflow vulnerability.
The main security fixes appear to be focused on thread safety and race conditions in the audio processing pipeline, particularly around shared state accessed from both audio and non-audio threads. The addition of atomic variables and thread-safe queues suggests these were real concerns being addressed.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-fonts/font-size-zero-1-ref.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-fonts/font-size-zero-1-ref.html@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ <link rel="author" title="L. David Baron" href="https://dbaron.org/"> <link rel="author" title="Mozilla" href="http://www.mozilla.org/"> <link rel="mismatch" href="font-size-zero-1-notref.html">-<meta name="flags" content=""> <style> /* spec ambiguous whether font-size-adjust influences line-height: normal */ body { line-height: 1.2 }
Let me analyze the code diff for potential security vulnerabilities. 1. Vulnerability Existed: no No specific vulnerability found [File] [Lines 3-6] [Old Code] <meta name="flags" content=""> [Fixed Code] (line removed) Additional details: - The diff shows removal of an empty meta tag with "flags" attribute - This doesn't appear to be security-related but rather test configuration cleanup - No known vulnerability patterns or security concerns are present in this change - The change seems to be removing unused test metadata rather than fixing a security issue No other changes were present in the diff that might indicate security fixes. The modification appears to be a minor cleanup of test file metadata rather than addressing any security vulnerability.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/devtools/client/debugger/test/mochitest/browser_dbg-inline-script-offset.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/devtools/client/debugger/test/mochitest/browser_dbg-inline-script-offset.js@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ add_task(async function() { const dbg = await initDebugger("doc-inline-script-offset.html");+ await selectSource(dbg, "doc-inline-script-offset.html"); await addBreakpoint(dbg, "doc-inline-script-offset.html", 6, 66); await reload(dbg); await waitForPaused(dbg);
Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security fixes:
Vulnerability Existed: no
[No specific vulnerability found] [devtools/client/debugger/test/mochitest/browser_dbg-inline-script-offset.js] [Lines 8-11]
[Old Code]
const dbg = await initDebugger("doc-inline-script-offset.html");
await addBreakpoint(dbg, "doc-inline-script-offset.html", 6, 66);
await reload(dbg);
await waitForPaused(dbg);
[Fixed Code]
const dbg = await initDebugger("doc-inline-script-offset.html");
await selectSource(dbg, "doc-inline-script-offset.html");
await addBreakpoint(dbg, "doc-inline-script-offset.html", 6, 66);
await reload(dbg);
await waitForPaused(dbg);
Additional Details:
The change appears to be a test improvement rather than a security fix. It adds an explicit step to select the source before adding a breakpoint, which makes the test more robust but doesn't address any security vulnerability. The modification is in a test file and doesn't affect production code.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/js/src/vm/SharedMem.h+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/js/src/vm/SharedMem.h@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ #ifndef vm_SharedMem_h #define vm_SharedMem_h++#include "mozilla/Assertions.h" #include <type_traits>
Analyzing the provided code diff for security fixes: 1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential Missing Include Guard or Header Inclusion] [js/src/vm/SharedMem.h] [Lines 6-8] [Old Code] ```cpp #ifndef vm_SharedMem_h #define vm_SharedMem_h ``` [Fixed Code] ```cpp #ifndef vm_SharedMem_h #define vm_SharedMem_h #include "mozilla/Assertions.h" ``` Additional Details: The diff shows the addition of `#include "mozilla/Assertions.h"`. While this could be related to security (as assertions help catch invalid states), it's not clear if this fixes a specific vulnerability or is just a general improvement. The inclusion might be for better error checking or to prevent undefined behavior, but without more context, we can't be certain.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-tables/table-has-box-sizing-border-box-001.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-tables/table-has-box-sizing-border-box-001.html@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ <link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-tables-3/#mapping"> <link rel="match" href="../reference/ref-filled-green-100px-square-only.html"> <link rel="bookmark" href="https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=598134" />-<meta name="flags" content="" /> <meta name="assert" content="default box-sizing for <table> is border-box" /> <title> UA stylesheet, <table>, box-sizing
Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security vulnerabilities: Vulnerability Existed: no [No specific vulnerability] [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-tables/table-has-box-sizing-border-box-001.html] [Line 4] [Old Code: <meta name="flags" content="" />] [Fixed Code: (removed)] Additional Details: 1. This appears to be a test file modification removing an unused/empty meta tag. 2. The change doesn't relate to any security vulnerability - it's just removing a redundant HTML element. 3. No security implications are apparent from this change. 4. The modification seems to be part of general code cleanup rather than a security fix.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.