Shared security patch analysis results
AI Used: DEEPSEEK deepseek-chat--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/security/manager/ssl/VerifySSLServerCertChild.h+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/security/manager/ssl/VerifySSLServerCertChild.h@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ NS_INLINE_DECL_THREADSAFE_REFCOUNTING(VerifySSLServerCertChild, override); explicit VerifySSLServerCertChild(- const UniqueCERTCertificate& aCert, SSLServerCertVerificationResult* aResultTask, nsTArray<nsTArray<uint8_t>>&& aPeerCertChain, uint32_t aProviderFlags);@@ -42,14 +41,12 @@ private: ~VerifySSLServerCertChild() = default;- UniqueCERTCertificate mCert; RefPtr<SSLServerCertVerificationResult> mResultTask; nsTArray<nsTArray<uint8_t>> mPeerCertChain; uint32_t mProviderFlags; }; SECStatus RemoteProcessCertVerification(- const UniqueCERTCertificate& aCert, nsTArray<nsTArray<uint8_t>>&& aPeerCertChain, const nsACString& aHostName, int32_t aPort, const OriginAttributes& aOriginAttributes, Maybe<nsTArray<uint8_t>>& aStapledOCSPResponse,
Analyzing the provided code diff for security fixes:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Certificate Handling Issue] [security/manager/ssl/VerifySSLServerCertChild.h] [Lines 27,42]
Old Code:
```cpp
explicit VerifySSLServerCertChild(
const UniqueCERTCertificate& aCert,
SSLServerCertVerificationResult* aResultTask,
nsTArray<nsTArray<uint8_t>>&& aPeerCertChain, uint32_t aProviderFlags);
UniqueCERTCertificate mCert;
```
Fixed Code:
```cpp
explicit VerifySSLServerCertChild(
SSLServerCertVerificationResult* aResultTask,
nsTArray<nsTArray<uint8_t>>&& aPeerCertChain, uint32_t aProviderFlags);
```
Additional Details: The removal of certificate parameter and member variable might indicate a security improvement in certificate handling, but without more context, it's unclear if this was fixing a specific vulnerability.
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Certificate Verification Issue] [security/manager/ssl/VerifySSLServerCertChild.h] [Lines 48]
Old Code:
```cpp
SECStatus RemoteProcessCertVerification(
const UniqueCERTCertificate& aCert,
nsTArray<nsTArray<uint8_t>>&& aPeerCertChain, const nsACString& aHostName,
```
Fixed Code:
```cpp
SECStatus RemoteProcessCertVerification(
nsTArray<nsTArray<uint8_t>>&& aPeerCertChain, const nsACString& aHostName,
```
Additional Details: Similar to the first change, the removal of the certificate parameter might indicate a change in verification logic, but the exact security implications are unclear without more context.
Note: While these changes appear to modify certificate handling logic, we cannot definitively identify specific vulnerabilities being fixed without additional context about the security issues they address. The changes might be part of a larger security refactoring rather than fixing specific vulnerabilities.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.transparent.lighter.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.transparent.lighter.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba(0, 255, 0, 0.5)';@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'lighter'; ctx.fillStyle = 'rgba(0, 0, 255, 0.75)'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,128,191,255, "50,25", "0,128,191,255", 5);+_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,128,191,255, "50,25", "0,128,191,255", 5); t.done(); });
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming and don't affect security. Here's the analysis following your requested format:
Vulnerability Existed: no
[No security vulnerability found] [testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/compositing/2d.composite.transparent.lighter.worker.js] [Lines 13-14, 22]
[Old Code]
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
...
_assertPixelApprox(offscreenCanvas, 50,25, 0,128,191,255, "50,25", "0,128,191,255", 5);
[Fixed Code]
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
...
_assertPixelApprox(canvas, 50,25, 0,128,191,255, "50,25", "0,128,191,255", 5);
The changes simply rename the variable `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` for consistency or readability purposes. There are no security implications in this change.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-padding-box-border-radius-002.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-shapes/shape-outside/shape-box/shape-outside-padding-box-border-radius-002.html@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ <link rel="author" title="Mozilla" href="http://www.mozilla.org/"> <link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-1/#shapes-from-box-values"> <link rel="match" href="reference/shape-outside-padding-box-border-radius-002-ref.html">- <meta name="flags" content=""> <meta name="assert" content="Test the boxes are wrapping around the right float shape defined by the padding-box and border-radius value."> <style> .container {
Analysis of the code diff: 1. Vulnerability Existed: no No security vulnerability found [File] [Lines 9] Old Code: <meta name="flags" content=""> Fixed Code: (line removed) Additional Details: - The change simply removes an empty meta tag for "flags" which appears to be a test configuration element - This doesn't relate to any security vulnerability - The modification is likely for code cleanup rather than security fixes - No CVE or known vulnerability pattern matches this change No other vulnerabilities detected in the provided diff. The change appears to be a minor HTML cleanup rather than a security-related fix.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.gradient.conic.negative.rotation.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.gradient.conic.negative.rotation.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); const g = ctx.createConicGradient(-Math.PI/2, 50, 25); // It's red in the upper right region and green on the lower left region@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ g.addColorStop(0.75, "#f00"); ctx.fillStyle = g; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 25,15, 255,0,0,255, "25,15", "255,0,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 75,40, 0,255,0,255, "75,40", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 25,15, 255,0,0,255, "25,15", "255,0,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 75,40, 0,255,0,255, "75,40", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security-related changes. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming (from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`) and the corresponding updates to variable references. Here's the analysis following your requested format:
Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found
File: testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.gradient.conic.negative.rotation.worker.js
Lines: 13-14, 24-25
Old Code:
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 25,15, 255,0,0,255, "25,15", "255,0,0,255");
_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 75,40, 0,255,0,255, "75,40", "0,255,0,255");
Fixed Code:
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
_assertPixel(canvas, 25,15, 255,0,0,255, "25,15", "255,0,0,255");
_assertPixel(canvas, 75,40, 0,255,0,255, "75,40", "0,255,0,255");
The changes are purely cosmetic/refactoring in nature and don't affect security. No known vulnerabilities are being addressed in this diff.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/widget/android/nsWindow.h+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/widget/android/nsWindow.h@@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ nsEventStatus& aStatus) override; nsEventStatus DispatchEvent(mozilla::WidgetGUIEvent* aEvent); virtual already_AddRefed<nsIScreen> GetWidgetScreen() override;- virtual nsresult MakeFullScreen(bool aFullScreen,- nsIScreen* aTargetScreen = nullptr) override;+ virtual nsresult MakeFullScreen(bool aFullScreen) override; void SetCursor(const Cursor& aDefaultCursor) override; void* GetNativeData(uint32_t aDataType) override; void SetNativeData(uint32_t aDataType, uintptr_t aVal) override;
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff: 1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential Parameter Removal Vulnerability] [widget/android/nsWindow.h] [Lines 165-166] [Old Code] `virtual nsresult MakeFullScreen(bool aFullScreen, nsIScreen* aTargetScreen = nullptr) override;` [Fixed Code] `virtual nsresult MakeFullScreen(bool aFullScreen) override;` Additional Details: The diff shows removal of the optional `aTargetScreen` parameter from the `MakeFullScreen` method. While this could potentially be a security fix (removing a parameter that might have been unsafe or unnecessary), there isn't enough context to determine if this was specifically addressing a known vulnerability. The change could also be simply an API simplification. Without more information about how this parameter was used, we can't definitively say this was a security fix.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/FileAPI/support/Blob.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/FileAPI/support/Blob.js@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 'use strict'-function test_blob(fn, expectations) {+self.test_blob = (fn, expectations) => { var expected = expectations.expected, type = expectations.type, desc = expectations.desc;@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ }); }-function test_blob_binary(fn, expectations) {+self.test_blob_binary = (fn, expectations) => { var expected = expectations.expected, type = expectations.type, desc = expectations.desc;
Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security analysis:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
Potential Global Scope Pollution [File] [Lines 1-24]
[Old Code]
function test_blob(fn, expectations) {
[Fixed Code]
self.test_blob = (fn, expectations) => {
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
Potential Global Scope Pollution [File] [Lines 24-end]
[Old Code]
function test_blob_binary(fn, expectations) {
[Fixed Code]
self.test_blob_binary = (fn, expectations) => {
Additional Details:
The changes appear to be modifying function declarations to be explicitly assigned to the `self` object (likely referring to the window or worker global scope). While this isn't a direct security fix, it could be related to:
1. Preventing accidental global scope pollution in certain environments
2. Making the functions explicitly available in the intended scope
3. Potentially preventing shadowing of these functions in some cases
However, without more context about the broader codebase and usage patterns, it's difficult to determine if this was fixing an actual security vulnerability or just improving code organization. The changes could be considered defensive programming rather than addressing a specific known vulnerability.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/devtools/client/performance-new/test/browser/browser_split-toolbar-button.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/devtools/client/performance-new/test/browser/browser_split-toolbar-button.js@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ ok(!dropmarker.hasAttribute("open"), "should start with the panel closed"); ok(!isActive(), "should start with the profiler inactive");- const popupShownPromise = waitForProfilerPopupEvent("popupshown");+ const popupShownPromise = waitForProfilerPopupEvent(window, "popupshown"); dropmarker.click(); await popupShownPromise;@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ await getElementByLabel(document, "Start Recording"); info("Press Escape to close the panel.");- const popupHiddenPromise = waitForProfilerPopupEvent("popuphidden");+ const popupHiddenPromise = waitForProfilerPopupEvent(window, "popuphidden"); EventUtils.synthesizeKey("KEY_Escape"); await popupHiddenPromise; ok(!dropmarker.hasAttribute("open"), "panel should be closed");
Let me analyze the code diff following the specified format:
Vulnerability Existed: no
[No specific vulnerability] [devtools/client/performance-new/test/browser/browser_split-toolbar-button.js] [Lines 77,87]
[Old Code]
const popupShownPromise = waitForProfilerPopupEvent("popupshown");
const popupHiddenPromise = waitForProfilerPopupEvent("popuphidden");
[Fixed Code]
const popupShownPromise = waitForProfilerPopupEvent(window, "popupshown");
const popupHiddenPromise = waitForProfilerPopupEvent(window, "popuphidden");
Additional Details:
- This appears to be a test file modification rather than a security fix
- The change adds a `window` parameter to event waiting functions
- No security vulnerability is being addressed here, just improved test reliability
- The modification ensures the events are listened to on the correct window object
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/performance/pageload_sites.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/performance/pageload_sites.json@@ -200,10 +200,10 @@ "login": false, "name": "expedia", "test_url": "https://expedia.com/Hotel-Search?destination=New+York%2C+New+York&latLong=40.756680%2C-73.986470®ionId=178293&startDate=&endDate=&rooms=1&_xpid=11905%7C1&adults=2",- "secondary_url": "https://www.expedia.com/Activities"- },- {- "login": false,+ "secondary_url": "https://groups.expedia.com/Group-Rate/?locale=en_US&ol=1"+ },+ {+ "login": true, "name": "facebook", "test_url": "https://www.facebook.com", "secondary_url": "https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/?ref=bookmark",@@ -213,6 +213,21 @@ ] }, {+ "login": true,+ "login-test": true,+ "name": "facebook-login",+ "test_url": "https://www.facebook.com",+ "type": "interactive",+ "test_cmds": [+ ["setup_login", "https://www.facebook.com"],+ ["wait.byTime", 1000],+ ["login", ""],+ ["measure.start", "marketplace"],+ ["navigate", "https://www.facebook.com/marketplace"],+ ["measure.stop", ""]+ ]+ },+ { "login": false, "name": "fandom", "test_url": "https://www.fandom.com/articles/fallout-76-will-live-and-die-on-the-creativity-of-its-playerbase",@@ -258,8 +273,7 @@ { "login": false, "name": "imdb",- "test_url": "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084967/?ref_=nv_sr_2",- "secondary_url": "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084967/episodes/?ref_=tt_ov_epl"+ "test_url": "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084967/?ref_=nv_sr_2" }, { "login": false,@@ -269,7 +283,16 @@ "test_cmds": [ ["click.byXpathAndWait", "/html/body/div[1]/div/div/div/div[2]/div/button[2]"], ["click.byXpathAndWait", "/html/body/div[1]/div/div/div/div[3]/div[2]/button"]- ]+ ],+ "secondary_url": "https://imgur.com/gallery/L13Ci",+ "preferences": {+ "media.autoplay.default": 5,+ "media.autoplay.ask-permission": true,+ "media.autoplay.blocking_policy": 1,+ "media.autoplay.block-webaudio": true,+ "media.allowed-to-play.enabled": false,+ "media.block-autoplay-until-in-foreground": true+ } }, { "login": true,@@ -314,7 +337,7 @@ { "login": true, "name": "office",- "test_url": "https://www.office.com/launch/word",+ "test_url": "https://www.office.com/launch/powerpoint/", "secondary_url": "https://www.office.com/" }, {
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff for security fixes: 1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure Potential URL Redirection Issue [testing/performance/pageload_sites.json] [Lines 200-203] Old Code: `"secondary_url": "https://www.expedia.com/Activities"` Fixed Code: `"secondary_url": "https://groups.expedia.com/Group-Rate/?locale=en_US&ol=1"` Note: The URL was changed but it's unclear if this was fixing a security issue or just updating test URLs. 2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure Authentication Requirement Change [testing/performance/pageload_sites.json] [Lines 204-206] Old Code: `"login": false,` Fixed Code: `"login": true,` Note: Changed Facebook test to require login, but unclear if this was security-related or just test configuration. 3. Vulnerability Existed: not sure Added Login Test Configuration [testing/performance/pageload_sites.json] [Lines 213-225] Old Code: (no login test existed) Fixed Code: Added new "facebook-login" test configuration with login commands Note: This appears to be adding test functionality rather than fixing a security issue. 4. Vulnerability Existed: not sure URL Simplification [testing/performance/pageload_sites.json] [Lines 258-260] Old Code: `"test_url": "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084967/?ref_=nv_sr_2",` `"secondary_url": "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084967/episodes/?ref_=tt_ov_epl"` Fixed Code: `"test_url": "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084967/?ref_=nv_sr_2"` Note: Secondary URL was removed, but unclear if this was security-related. 5. Vulnerability Existed: not sure Added Security Preferences [testing/performance/pageload_sites.json] [Lines 269-283] Old Code: (no preferences existed) Fixed Code: Added multiple media autoplay and permission-related preferences Note: These appear to be security-related preferences but unclear if they're fixing a specific vulnerability. 6. Vulnerability Existed: not sure Changed Office Test URL [testing/performance/pageload_sites.json] [Lines 314-316] Old Code: `"test_url": "https://www.office.com/launch/word",` Fixed Code: `"test_url": "https://www.office.com/launch/powerpoint/",` Note: Changed test URL but unclear if this was security-related. None of these changes clearly indicate specific security vulnerabilities being fixed. Most appear to be test configuration updates or additions. The most security-relevant change is the addition of media autoplay preferences, but this seems more like a test configuration enhancement than a vulnerability fix.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.create2.basic.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.create2.basic.html@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); _assertDifferent(ctx.createImageData(1, 1), null, "ctx.createImageData(1, 1)", "null"); t.done();
Based on the provided diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming (from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`) without any security implications.
Answer for Each Vulnerability:
Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found
File: testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/pixel-manipulation/2d.imageData.create2.basic.html
[Lines 17-18]
Old Code:
var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');
Fixed Code:
var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
Additional Notes:
The change appears to be a simple refactoring or code style improvement rather than a security fix. The functionality remains exactly the same, just with a different variable name. No security-related patterns or vulnerabilities (such as XSS, injection, memory issues, etc.) are being addressed in this diff.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/media/ffvpx/libavcodec/codec_list.c+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/media/ffvpx/libavcodec/codec_list.c@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ #if CONFIG_MP3_DECODER &ff_mp3_decoder, #endif+#if CONFIG_LIBDAV1D+ &ff_libdav1d_decoder,+#endif #if CONFIG_AV1_DECODER &ff_av1_decoder, #endif
Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for security fixes:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Codec Addition] [media/ffvpx/libavcodec/codec_list.c] [Lines 11-14]
[Old Code]
#if CONFIG_MP3_DECODER
&ff_mp3_decoder,
#endif
#if CONFIG_AV1_DECODER
&ff_av1_decoder,
#endif
[Fixed Code]
#if CONFIG_MP3_DECODER
&ff_mp3_decoder,
#endif
#if CONFIG_LIBDAV1D
&ff_libdav1d_decoder,
#endif
#if CONFIG_AV1_DECODER
&ff_av1_decoder,
#endif
Additional Details:
- The diff shows the addition of the libdav1d decoder to the codec list
- This appears to be a feature addition rather than a security fix
- No specific vulnerability is being addressed here
- The change might be related to AV1 video support improvements
- Without more context, it's unclear if this relates to any specific security issue
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/dom/media/webrtc/third_party_build/gn-configs/x64_False_x86_win.json+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/dom/media/webrtc/third_party_build/gn-configs/x64_False_x86_win.json@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -226,7 +225,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -395,7 +393,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -564,7 +561,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -738,7 +734,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -908,7 +903,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1074,7 +1068,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1237,7 +1230,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1409,7 +1401,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1582,7 +1573,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1754,7 +1744,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -1927,7 +1916,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2099,7 +2087,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2273,7 +2260,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2434,7 +2420,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2608,7 +2593,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2784,7 +2768,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -2945,7 +2928,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3114,7 +3096,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3289,7 +3270,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3458,7 +3438,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3633,7 +3612,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3808,7 +3786,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -3984,7 +3961,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4145,7 +4121,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4317,7 +4292,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4493,7 +4467,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4664,7 +4637,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -4850,7 +4822,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5032,7 +5003,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5214,7 +5184,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5379,7 +5348,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5544,7 +5512,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5714,7 +5681,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -5884,7 +5850,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6060,7 +6025,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6233,7 +6197,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6400,7 +6363,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6571,7 +6533,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6743,7 +6704,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -6911,7 +6871,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7078,7 +7037,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7245,7 +7203,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7410,7 +7367,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7578,7 +7534,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7751,7 +7706,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -7926,7 +7880,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8090,7 +8043,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8260,7 +8212,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8427,7 +8378,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8595,7 +8545,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8762,7 +8711,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -8930,7 +8878,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9107,7 +9054,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9276,7 +9222,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9453,7 +9398,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9624,7 +9568,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9790,7 +9733,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -9959,7 +9901,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10124,7 +10065,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10291,7 +10231,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10452,7 +10391,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10631,7 +10569,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10808,7 +10745,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -10985,7 +10921,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11155,7 +11090,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11332,7 +11266,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11493,7 +11426,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11669,7 +11601,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -11848,7 +11779,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12023,7 +11953,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12186,7 +12115,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12358,7 +12286,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12534,7 +12461,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12723,7 +12649,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -12922,7 +12847,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13095,7 +13019,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13259,7 +13182,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13426,7 +13348,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13590,7 +13511,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13751,7 +13671,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -13914,7 +13833,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14079,7 +13997,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14250,7 +14167,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14413,7 +14329,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14574,7 +14489,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14750,7 +14664,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -14911,7 +14824,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15072,7 +14984,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15237,7 +15148,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15407,7 +15317,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15576,7 +15485,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15749,7 +15657,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -15922,7 +15829,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16083,7 +15989,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16244,7 +16149,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16413,7 +16317,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16575,7 +16478,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -16753,7 +16655,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17001,7 +16902,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17206,7 +17106,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17371,7 +17270,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17551,7 +17449,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17725,7 +17622,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -17946,7 +17842,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18161,7 +18056,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18341,7 +18235,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18527,7 +18420,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18707,7 +18599,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -18924,7 +18815,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19102,7 +18992,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19271,7 +19160,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19463,7 +19351,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19636,7 +19523,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19798,7 +19684,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -19960,7 +19845,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20170,7 +20054,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20344,7 +20227,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20570,7 +20452,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20729,7 +20610,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -20899,7 +20779,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21073,7 +20952,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21234,7 +21112,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21411,7 +21288,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro", "-Wno-builtin-macro-redefined", "-D__DATE__=",@@ -21583,7 +21459,6 @@ "-fmsc-version=1916", "/guard:cf,nochecks", "-m32",- "-fansi-escape-codes", "/Brepro",
After analyzing the provided code diff, I can identify one consistent change made throughout the file: 1. Vulnerability Existed: yes ANSI Escape Code Injection Vulnerability dom/media/webrtc/third_party_build/gn-configs/x64_False_x86_win.json (multiple locations) Old Code: "-fansi-escape-codes" Fixed Code: (removed) The change removes the "-fansi-escape-codes" compiler flag from multiple locations in the configuration file. This flag enables ANSI escape code processing, which could potentially lead to ANSI escape code injection vulnerabilities if untrusted input containing ANSI escape sequences is displayed in a terminal. By removing this flag, the code becomes more secure as it prevents potential: 1. Terminal manipulation attacks (where malicious escape sequences could alter terminal behavior) 2. Information disclosure (via terminal control sequences) 3. Potential denial of service (via terminal control sequences) This appears to be a security hardening change to prevent potential injection vulnerabilities related to terminal output processing.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/streams/transform-streams/reentrant-strategies.any.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/streams/transform-streams/reentrant-strategies.any.js@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@-// META: global=window,worker,jsshell+// META: global=window,worker // META: script=../resources/recording-streams.js // META: script=../resources/rs-utils.js // META: script=../resources/test-utils.js
Analysis of the provided code diff:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Removal of Test Environment] [testing/web-platform/tests/streams/transform-streams/reentrant-strategies.any.js] [Line 1]
[Old Code] // META: global=window,worker,jsshell
[Fixed Code] // META: global=window,worker
Additional Details:
- The diff shows removal of "jsshell" from the test environment globals. This might indicate a security-related change if jsshell was considered an unsafe or unnecessary testing environment, but without more context about why it was removed, we can't be certain if this was a security fix or just a test configuration change.
- The change could potentially be related to limiting test environments to more secure/sandboxed ones (window and worker), but this is speculative.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.pattern.modify.canvas2.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.pattern.modify.canvas2.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); var offscreenCanvas2 = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50); var ctx2 = offscreenCanvas2.getContext('2d');@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ ctx2.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50); ctx.fillStyle = pattern; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 1,1, 0,255,0,255, "1,1", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 98,1, 0,255,0,255, "98,1", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 1,48, 0,255,0,255, "1,48", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 98,48, 0,255,0,255, "98,48", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 1,1, 0,255,0,255, "1,1", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 98,1, 0,255,0,255, "98,1", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 1,48, 0,255,0,255, "1,48", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 98,48, 0,255,0,255, "98,48", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
Based on the provided code diff, I don't see any security vulnerabilities being fixed. The changes appear to be purely variable renaming and don't address any security issues.
Answer for Each Vulnerability:
Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found
File: testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/fill-and-stroke-styles/2d.pattern.modify.canvas2.worker.js
Changes were limited to variable renaming (offscreenCanvas → canvas) and corresponding assertion updates
The changes are:
1. Renamed variable `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`
2. Updated the `_assertPixel` calls to use the new variable name
3. No security-related modifications were made
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/executors/executormarionette.py+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/executors/executormarionette.py@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ TestharnessExecutor, TimedRunner, WdspecExecutor,- WdspecProtocol, get_pages, strip_server) from .protocol import (ActionSequenceProtocolPart,@@ -1147,34 +1146,6 @@ self.logger.warning(traceback.format_exc())-class GeckoDriverProtocol(WdspecProtocol):- server_cls = None # To avoid circular imports we set this at runtime---class MarionetteWdspecExecutor(WdspecExecutor):- protocol_cls = GeckoDriverProtocol-- def __init__(self, logger, browser, server_config, webdriver_binary,- webdriver_args, timeout_multiplier=1, capabilities=None,- debug_info=None, environ=None, stackfix_dir=None,- symbols_path=None, leak_report_file=None, asan=False,- group_metadata=None, browser_settings=None, **kwargs):-- from ..browsers.firefox import GeckoDriverServer- super().__init__(logger, browser, server_config, webdriver_binary,- webdriver_args, timeout_multiplier=timeout_multiplier,- capabilities=capabilities, debug_info=debug_info,- environ=environ, **kwargs)- self.protocol_cls.server_cls = GeckoDriverServer- self.output_handler_kwargs = {"stackfix_dir": stackfix_dir,- "symbols_path": symbols_path,- "asan": asan,- "leak_report_file": leak_report_file}- self.output_handler_start_kwargs = {"group_metadata": group_metadata}- self.output_handler_start_kwargs.update(browser_settings)--- class MarionetteCrashtestExecutor(CrashtestExecutor): def __init__(self, logger, browser, server_config, timeout_multiplier=1, debug_info=None, capabilities=None, debug=False,@@ -1308,3 +1279,15 @@ screenshots[i] = screenshot.split(",", 1)[1] return screenshots+++class MarionetteWdspecExecutor(WdspecExecutor):+ def __init__(self, logger, browser, *args, **kwargs):+ super().__init__(logger, browser, *args, **kwargs)++ args = self.capabilities["moz:firefoxOptions"].setdefault("args", [])+ args.extend(["--profile", self.browser.profile])++ for option in ["androidPackage", "androidDeviceSerial", "env"]:+ if hasattr(browser, option):+ self.capabilities["moz:firefoxOptions"][option] = getattr(browser, option)
Analyzing the provided code diff, I'll identify potential security vulnerabilities:
1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Information Leakage] [testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/executors/executormarionette.py] [Lines 1147-1169 (removed)]
[Old Code]
class GeckoDriverProtocol(WdspecProtocol):
server_cls = None # To avoid circular imports we set this at runtime
class MarionetteWdspecExecutor(WdspecExecutor):
protocol_cls = GeckoDriverProtocol
def __init__(self, logger, browser, server_config, webdriver_binary,
webdriver_args, timeout_multiplier=1, capabilities=None,
debug_info=None, environ=None, stackfix_dir=None,
symbols_path=None, leak_report_file=None, asan=False,
group_metadata=None, browser_settings=None, **kwargs):
from ..browsers.firefox import GeckoDriverServer
super().__init__(logger, browser, server_config, webdriver_binary,
webdriver_args, timeout_multiplier=timeout_multiplier,
capabilities=capabilities, debug_info=debug_info,
environ=environ, **kwargs)
self.protocol_cls.server_cls = GeckoDriverServer
self.output_handler_kwargs = {"stackfix_dir": stackfix_dir,
"symbols_path": symbols_path,
"asan": asan,
"leak_report_file": leak_report_file}
self.output_handler_start_kwargs = {"group_metadata": group_metadata}
self.output_handler_start_kwargs.update(browser_settings)
[Fixed Code]
[Entire class removed]
2. Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Security Configuration Improvement] [testing/web-platform/tests/tools/wptrunner/wptrunner/executors/executormarionette.py] [Lines 1308-1319 (added)]
[Old Code]
[No equivalent code]
[Fixed Code]
class MarionetteWdspecExecutor(WdspecExecutor):
def __init__(self, logger, browser, *args, **kwargs):
super().__init__(logger, browser, *args, **kwargs)
args = self.capabilities["moz:firefoxOptions"].setdefault("args", [])
args.extend(["--profile", self.browser.profile])
for option in ["androidPackage", "androidDeviceSerial", "env"]:
if hasattr(browser, option):
self.capabilities["moz:firefoxOptions"][option] = getattr(browser, option)
Note: The changes appear to be more of a refactoring than direct security fixes. The removal of the GeckoDriverProtocol class and simplification of MarionetteWdspecExecutor might improve security by reducing complexity, but no specific vulnerabilities are clearly addressed. The new implementation appears to handle browser capabilities more explicitly, which could potentially improve security configuration.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/python/mozlint/test/test_cli.py+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/python/mozlint/test/test_cli.py@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ def test_cli_with_ascii_encoding(run, monkeypatch, capfd):- cmd = [sys.executable, "runcli.py", "-l=string", "-f=stylish"]+ cmd = [sys.executable, "runcli.py", "-l=string", "-f=stylish", "files/foobar.js"] env = os.environ.copy() env["PYTHONPATH"] = os.pathsep.join(sys.path) env["PYTHONIOENCODING"] = "ascii"
Let me analyze the provided code diff for security fixes. Vulnerability Existed: no No specific vulnerability found [File] python/mozlint/test/test_cli.py [Lines] 34 [Old Code] cmd = [sys.executable, "runcli.py", "-l=string", "-f=stylish"] [Fixed Code] cmd = [sys.executable, "runcli.py", "-l=string", "-f=stylish", "files/foobar.js"] Additional Details: This appears to be a test case modification where a test file "files/foobar.js" was added to the command arguments. The change doesn't show any security vulnerability fixes, but rather seems to be making the test case more complete by actually specifying a file to lint. The encoding environment variable (PYTHONIOENCODING) was already present in both versions and isn't related to any security fix. No security vulnerabilities were identified in this diff. The change appears to be a routine test improvement rather than a security fix.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/dom/locks/Lock.cpp+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/dom/locks/Lock.cpp@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ return *mWaitingPromise; }-void Lock::ResolvedCallback(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue) {+void Lock::ResolvedCallback(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue,+ ErrorResult& aRv) { if (mLockRequestChild) { locks::PLockRequestChild::Send__delete__(mLockRequestChild, false); mLockRequestChild = nullptr;@@ -56,7 +57,8 @@ mReleasedPromise->MaybeResolve(aValue); }-void Lock::RejectedCallback(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue) {+void Lock::RejectedCallback(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue,+ ErrorResult& aRv) { if (mLockRequestChild) { locks::PLockRequestChild::Send__delete__(mLockRequestChild, false); mLockRequestChild = nullptr;
Here's the analysis of the provided code diff: 1. Vulnerability Existed: not sure [Potential Error Handling Improvement] [dom/locks/Lock.cpp] [Lines 48-57] [Old Code] void Lock::ResolvedCallback(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue) void Lock::RejectedCallback(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue) [Fixed Code] void Lock::ResolvedCallback(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue, ErrorResult& aRv) void Lock::RejectedCallback(JSContext* aCx, JS::Handle<JS::Value> aValue, ErrorResult& aRv) Additional Details: - The main change is the addition of ErrorResult parameters to both callback functions - This appears to be adding better error handling capability, but it's not clear if this was fixing a specific security vulnerability - The modification allows error conditions to be properly propagated, which could potentially prevent unhandled exceptions or error conditions - Without more context, it's difficult to determine if this was fixing an actual vulnerability or just improving error handling robustness
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/devtools/client/fronts/descriptors/tab.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/devtools/client/fronts/descriptors/tab.js@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ const SERVER_TARGET_SWITCHING_ENABLED_PREF = "devtools.target-switching.server.enabled";+const POPUP_DEBUG_PREF = "devtools.popups.debug"; /** * DescriptorFront for tab targets.@@ -97,8 +98,13 @@ } getWatcher() {+ const isPopupDebuggingEnabled = Services.prefs.getBoolPref(+ POPUP_DEBUG_PREF,+ false+ ); return super.getWatcher({ isServerTargetSwitchingEnabled: this.isServerTargetSwitchingEnabled(),+ isPopupDebuggingEnabled, }); }
Here's the analysis following the specified format:
Vulnerability Existed: not sure
[Potential Information Leak] [devtools/client/fronts/descriptors/tab.js] [Lines 28, 97-103]
[Old Code]
```javascript
const SERVER_TARGET_SWITCHING_ENABLED_PREF =
"devtools.target-switching.server.enabled";
// ...
getWatcher() {
return super.getWatcher({
isServerTargetSwitchingEnabled: this.isServerTargetSwitchingEnabled(),
});
}
```
[Fixed Code]
```javascript
const SERVER_TARGET_SWITCHING_ENABLED_PREF =
"devtools.target-switching.server.enabled";
const POPUP_DEBUG_PREF = "devtools.popups.debug";
// ...
getWatcher() {
const isPopupDebuggingEnabled = Services.prefs.getBoolPref(
POPUP_DEBUG_PREF,
false
);
return super.getWatcher({
isServerTargetSwitchingEnabled: this.isServerTargetSwitchingEnabled(),
isPopupDebuggingEnabled,
});
}
```
Notes:
1. The change adds a new preference check for popup debugging
2. While not clearly a security fix, adding debug preference handling could be related to:
- Preventing unintended debug information exposure
- Controlling debug feature access
3. Without more context about how `isPopupDebuggingEnabled` is used in `super.getWatcher()`, I can't definitively classify this as a security fix
4. The change follows secure coding practices by:
- Using a defined constant for the preference name
- Providing a default value (false) for the preference check
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-backgrounds/border-image-space-001.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-backgrounds/border-image-space-001.html@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ <title>CSS Test: Border Image: box with spaced repeating border image</title> <link rel="author" title="Levi Weintraub" href="mailto:[email protected]"> <link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-border-image-repeat">- <meta name="flags" content=""> <meta name="assert" content="border-image-repeat: space property spaces out background image that doesn't fit an even number of times."> <link rel="match" href="reference/border-image-space-001-ref.html"> <style>
Analyzing the provided code diff, here's the security assessment: Vulnerability Existed: no [No specific vulnerability] [testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-backgrounds/border-image-space-001.html] [Lines 5] [Old Code] <meta name="flags" content=""> [Fixed Code] [Line removed] Additional Details: 1. The change simply removes an empty meta "flags" tag which appears to be test-related metadata. 2. This doesn't appear to be a security fix but rather a cleanup of test configuration. 3. No security vulnerability is being addressed here - the empty flags tag wouldn't pose any security risk. 4. The modification is more likely related to test maintenance or standardization rather than security.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/calc-background-size-1.html+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-values/calc-background-size-1.html@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ <link rel="author" title="L. David Baron" href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594934"> <link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#calc-notation"> <link rel="match" href="calc-background-size-1-ref.html">- <meta name="flags" content=""> <style type="text/css"> p {
Based on the provided diff, I'll analyze it for potential security vulnerabilities:
1. Vulnerability Existed: no
No specific vulnerability [File] [Lines 5]
[Old Code] `<meta name="flags" content="">`
[Fixed Code] (line removed)
Additional Details:
- The change simply removes an empty meta tag with a "flags" attribute, which doesn't appear to have any security implications.
- This appears to be a test file cleanup rather than a security fix.
- No known vulnerability is associated with this change.
- The modification doesn't affect any security-sensitive functionality.
The change seems to be purely cosmetic/cleanup related to test infrastructure rather than addressing any security issue.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.
--- /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_97_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.offset.positiveY.worker.js+++ /root/PatchLeaks-main/products/firefox_downloads/FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/firefox-FIREFOX_RELEASE_98_END/testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.offset.positiveY.worker.js@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ }); t.step(function() {-var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);-var ctx = offscreenCanvas.getContext('2d');+var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);+var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'); ctx.fillStyle = '#f00'; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 50);@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ ctx.shadowColor = '#0f0'; ctx.shadowOffsetY = 25; ctx.fillRect(0, 0, 100, 25);-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,12, 0,255,0,255, "50,12", "0,255,0,255");-_assertPixel(offscreenCanvas, 50,37, 0,255,0,255, "50,37", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,12, 0,255,0,255, "50,12", "0,255,0,255");+_assertPixel(canvas, 50,37, 0,255,0,255, "50,37", "0,255,0,255"); t.done(); });
After analyzing the provided code diff, I don't see any security-related fixes. The changes appear to be purely cosmetic/refactoring, renaming a variable from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas` for consistency or readability. Here's the analysis following your requested format:
Vulnerability Existed: no
No security vulnerability found
File: testing/web-platform/tests/html/canvas/offscreen/shadows/2d.shadow.offset.positiveY.worker.js
Old Code: var offscreenCanvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
Fixed Code: var canvas = new OffscreenCanvas(100, 50);
The changes are:
1. Variable name change from `offscreenCanvas` to `canvas`
2. Subsequent updates to use the new variable name in method calls
3. No changes to actual security-sensitive operations or parameters
This appears to be a refactoring change rather than a security fix. No vulnerabilities were addressed in this diff.
If an attacker could control the contents of an iframe sandboxed with <code>allow-popups</code> but not <code>allow-scripts</code>, they were able to craft a link that, when clicked, would lead to JavaScript execution in violation of the sandbox. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 98, Firefox ESR < 91.7, and Thunderbird < 91.7.